吴式与杨式太极拳上步动作的运动生物力学分析
发布时间：2019-01-09 15:48
【摘要】：研究目的:目前吴式太极拳在推广过程中存在着吴式太极拳杨式练法的问题,即动作是吴式太极拳的动作,但是练习中身型是杨式的身型。没有体现出吴式太极拳的特点,也无法达到练习吴式太极拳的效果。本研究的目的在于更好地区分吴式与杨式太极拳的不同风格特点,使练习者达到科学健身的效果。研究方法:选取吴式与杨式太极拳的全国冠军和北京市的冠军共6人。运用先进的FAB本体感觉测试系统对6位太极拳练习者进行测试。测试他们的上步动作,并重点分析上步动作中的弓步动作。研究结果:1.吴式与杨式太极拳练习者在上步动作过程中总时间不存在显著性差异,但是在单脚支撑时间上存在极显著性差异。吴式太极拳单脚支撑时间比杨式太极拳单脚支撑时间要长。2.弓步前腿膝关节足底压力占体重百分比不存在显著性差异,但是弓步后腿足底压力占体重百分比存在显著性差异。从而导致杨式太极拳前后脚足底压力差距较小,而吴式太极拳前后脚足底压力差距大。3.弓步前腿和弓步后腿膝关节弯曲角度都不存在显著性差,吴式与杨式太极拳在上步动作过程中膝关节弯曲角度特点是一样的。4.前髋和后髋弯曲角度都存在显著性差异,髋关节弯曲角度不一样主要是由于两种太极拳的身法要求不一样。5.躯干倾斜角度不存在显著性差异(P㧐0.05),骨盆倾斜角度存在极显著性差异(P0.01)。6.躯干受力、前髋受力、后髋受力、前膝受力、后膝受力都不存在显著性差异(P㧐0.05)。7.练习者在做吴式太极拳上步动作与杨式太极拳上步动作时,躯干扭转受力存在显著性差异,前髋扭转受力、后髋扭转受力、前膝扭转受力、后膝扭转受力不存在显著性差异(P㧐0.05)研究结论:1.吴式和杨式太极拳都有利于增加腿部力量和平衡稳定性,吴式太极拳上步动作更有利于增加腿部力量,而杨式太极拳上步动作更有利于步法的稳定性。2.吴式和杨式太极拳在上步动作过程中躯干受力变化不大,保证了重心的稳定,髋关节和膝关节受力变化较大说明上步动作对下肢的锻炼作用较大。3.杨式太极拳的立身中正和吴式太极拳的斜中寓正有共同特点,都要求躯干和骨盆在几乎同一条直线上。4.太极拳在上步动作过程中主要依靠髋关节的拧转来上步,膝关节几乎没有拧转。
[Abstract]:Research objective: at present, there exists the problem of Yang style practice in Wu Taijiquan, that is, the action is the action of Wu Taijiquan, but the body type is the body type of Yang style in the practice. It does not reflect the characteristics of Wu style Taijiquan, nor can it achieve the effect of practicing Wu style Taijiquan. The purpose of this study is to better distinguish the different styles of Wu style and Yang style Taijiquan so as to achieve the effect of scientific fitness. Methods: the national champion of Wu style and Yang style Taijiquan and the champion of Beijing were selected. Six Taijiquan practitioners were tested by the advanced FAB Noumenon sense testing system. Test their upper steps and focus on the bow movements in the last steps. Results: 1. There was no significant difference in the total time between Wu style and Yang style Taijiquan practitioners in the last step but there was a very significant difference in the support time of one foot. Wu style Taijiquan one-foot support time than Yang Taijiquan one-foot support time is longer. 2. There was no significant difference in the percentage of foot pressure to body weight, but there was significant difference in the percentage of foot pressure to body weight. Therefore, the foot sole pressure gap was smaller before and after Yang Taijiquan, while the foot sole pressure difference was larger before and after Wu Taijiquan. There was no significant difference in the knee joint bending angle between the foreleg and the hind leg of the bow, and the characteristics of the knee joint bending angle of Wu style and Yang type Taijiquan were the same in the process of the upper step. 4. There is significant difference between the anterior hip and the posterior hip bending angle. The main reason for the different hip bending angle is that the requirements of the two Taijiquan methods are not the same. 5. There was no significant difference in torso tilt angle (P0. 05), but extremely significant difference in pelvic tilt angle (P0. 01). There was no significant difference in torso force, anterior hip force, posterior hip force, anterior knee force and posterior knee force (P0. 05). There is significant difference in torsion force between Wu Taijiquan and Yang Taijiquan. The torsion force of the front hip, the posterior hip, the front knee, and the front knee are significantly different. There was no significant difference in torsional force of posterior knee (P0. 05). Conclusion: 1. Both Wu style and Yang type Taijiquan are beneficial to increase leg strength and balance stability, Wu style Taijiquan upper step action is more advantageous to increase leg strength, and Yang style Taijiquan step up action is more favorable to the stability of footwork. 2. Wu-style and Yang Taijiquan had little change in the torso force during the upper step movement, which ensured the stability of the center of gravity. The larger changes of the hip joint and the knee joint indicated that the upper step movement had a great effect on the lower limb exercise. 3. Yang style Taijiquan standing center and Wu style Taijiquan have the same characteristics in the oblique, both require the torso and pelvis in almost the same line. 4. Taijiquan mainly relies on hip twisting in the upper step, and the knee joint is almost untwisted.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G852.11
本文编号：2405828
[Abstract]:Research objective: at present, there exists the problem of Yang style practice in Wu Taijiquan, that is, the action is the action of Wu Taijiquan, but the body type is the body type of Yang style in the practice. It does not reflect the characteristics of Wu style Taijiquan, nor can it achieve the effect of practicing Wu style Taijiquan. The purpose of this study is to better distinguish the different styles of Wu style and Yang style Taijiquan so as to achieve the effect of scientific fitness. Methods: the national champion of Wu style and Yang style Taijiquan and the champion of Beijing were selected. Six Taijiquan practitioners were tested by the advanced FAB Noumenon sense testing system. Test their upper steps and focus on the bow movements in the last steps. Results: 1. There was no significant difference in the total time between Wu style and Yang style Taijiquan practitioners in the last step but there was a very significant difference in the support time of one foot. Wu style Taijiquan one-foot support time than Yang Taijiquan one-foot support time is longer. 2. There was no significant difference in the percentage of foot pressure to body weight, but there was significant difference in the percentage of foot pressure to body weight. Therefore, the foot sole pressure gap was smaller before and after Yang Taijiquan, while the foot sole pressure difference was larger before and after Wu Taijiquan. There was no significant difference in the knee joint bending angle between the foreleg and the hind leg of the bow, and the characteristics of the knee joint bending angle of Wu style and Yang type Taijiquan were the same in the process of the upper step. 4. There is significant difference between the anterior hip and the posterior hip bending angle. The main reason for the different hip bending angle is that the requirements of the two Taijiquan methods are not the same. 5. There was no significant difference in torso tilt angle (P0. 05), but extremely significant difference in pelvic tilt angle (P0. 01). There was no significant difference in torso force, anterior hip force, posterior hip force, anterior knee force and posterior knee force (P0. 05). There is significant difference in torsion force between Wu Taijiquan and Yang Taijiquan. The torsion force of the front hip, the posterior hip, the front knee, and the front knee are significantly different. There was no significant difference in torsional force of posterior knee (P0. 05). Conclusion: 1. Both Wu style and Yang type Taijiquan are beneficial to increase leg strength and balance stability, Wu style Taijiquan upper step action is more advantageous to increase leg strength, and Yang style Taijiquan step up action is more favorable to the stability of footwork. 2. Wu-style and Yang Taijiquan had little change in the torso force during the upper step movement, which ensured the stability of the center of gravity. The larger changes of the hip joint and the knee joint indicated that the upper step movement had a great effect on the lower limb exercise. 3. Yang style Taijiquan standing center and Wu style Taijiquan have the same characteristics in the oblique, both require the torso and pelvis in almost the same line. 4. Taijiquan mainly relies on hip twisting in the upper step, and the knee joint is almost untwisted.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G852.11
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张昌律;;杨式太极拳合并药物治疗 心脏病81例疗效观察(摘要)[J];体育科研;1987年11期
2 李士英，，王文杰，刘柏;老年妇女从事杨式太极拳前后的某些心功能指标的变化[J];山东体育学院学报;1994年03期
3 赵幼斌;杨式太极拳架类型和特点(上)[J];武当;2005年05期
4 ;杨式太极拳图解(3)[J];少林与太极;2009年11期
5 ;杨式太极拳图解(2)[J];少林与太极;2009年10期
6 ;杨式太极拳图解(4)[J];少林与太极;2009年12期
7 ;杨式太极拳图解(6)[J];少林与太极;2010年02期
8 严翰秀;;郑曼青宗师对杨式太极拳的杰出贡献(下)[J];武当;2011年09期
9 严翰秀;;郑曼青对杨式太极拳的贡献(上)[J];武当;2011年08期
10 张世昌;;杨式太极拳的3种境界[J];武当;2012年02期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 牛筱灵;牛晨;;贺词[A];第五届全国杨式太极拳名家传人学术研讨会文稿汇编[C];2007年
2 孟宪民;;杨式太极拳在杭州[A];第五届全国杨式太极拳名家传人学术研讨会文稿汇编[C];2007年
3 魏权;;陈微明师门简介[A];第五届全国杨式太极拳名家传人学术研讨会文稿汇编[C];2007年
4 ;后记[A];第五届全国杨式太极拳名家传人学术研讨会文稿汇编[C];2007年
5 丁水德;;牛春明在杭州[A];第五届全国杨式太极拳名家传人学术研讨会文稿汇编[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 左中甫;“体验式考察”值得称道[N];南京日报;2014年
2 王冠;自创拳法 吸引更多年轻人习武[N];成都日报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 陈媛媛;《杨式太极拳》（第二章第六节）翻译报告[D];河南大学;2015年
2 张倩茹;《杨式太极拳》（第二章第三节、第四节）翻译报告[D];河南大学;2015年
3 孟田;杨式太极拳发展的文化地理学研究[D];河南大学;2015年
4 冯平平;吴式与杨式太极拳上步动作的运动生物力学分析[D];北京体育大学;2017年
5 李真;杨式太极拳的传承与发展[D];天津体育学院;2009年
本文编号：2405828
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2405828.html
