静态拉伸后不同时间间隔对下肢力量和柔韧性的影响
发布时间：2019-05-22 19:54
【摘要】：无论在赛前还是赛后,运动员的拉伸行为都随处可见。在多种拉伸方式中,静态拉伸是其中一种较为常见的拉伸方式。一方面,先前对静态拉伸的研究,主要集中在其对运动员身体指标上的影响上,结果各有不同。另一方面,先前的实验室测试均采用连续测试的方法来探究静态拉伸对指标的影响,并没有考虑到测试本身也是一种刺激,也许会对结果产生干扰。目的:本研究旨在通过中等强度刺激对受试者的下肢进行静态拉伸,并测试爆发力、最大力量和柔韧性等指标,试图探求连续测试与分开测试之间是否存在差异及原因。方法:本实验对北京体育大学13名术科生进行中等强度的下肢静态拉伸,并采用SPSS23.0统计软件对连续测试和分开测试两种测试方法下受试者的下肢最大力量、柔韧性和爆发力进行统计分析。结果:1.对下肢最大力量测试得出,不同测试方案和不同时间点之间显著性0.156(P0.05),不同测试方案下5min、10min、15min显著性分别为0.194(P0.05)、0.007(P0.05)和0.006(P0.05)。2.对下肢柔韧性测试得出,不同测试方案和不同时间点之间显著性0.140(P0.05),不同测试方案下5min、10min、15min显著性分别为0.007(P0.05)、0.027(P0.05)和0.018(P0.05)。3.对下肢爆发力测试得出,不同测试方案和不同时间点之间显著性0.901(P0.05),不同测试方案下5min、10min、15min显著性分别为0.370(P0.05)、0.572(P0.05)和0.453(P0.05)。结论:1.研究静态拉伸对下肢最大力量测试的影响时,5分钟内,最大力量值不受前测测试影响;10-15分钟内,前测测试本身对最大力量值有显著影响。2.研究静态拉伸对下肢柔韧性测试的影响时,5分钟内,10分钟内和15分钟内,前测测试本身对柔韧性值均有显著影响。3.研究静态拉伸对下肢爆发力测试影响时,5分钟内,10分钟内和15分钟内,前测测试本身对爆发力值均无显著影响。
[Abstract]:Both before and after the competition, the stretching behavior of athletes can be seen everywhere. Static stretching is one of the most common tensile methods. On the one hand, the previous research on static stretching mainly focused on its influence on athletes' physical indexes, and the results were different. On the other hand, previous laboratory tests have used continuous testing to explore the effect of static tension on the index, without considering that the test itself is also a stimulus, which may interfere with the results. Objective: the purpose of this study was to test the explosive force, maximum strength and flexibility of the lower extremities of the subjects through moderate intensity stimulation, and to explore whether there was any difference between the continuous test and the separate test. Methods: in this experiment, 13 technical students of Beijing University of physical Education were subjected to medium strength static stretching of lower extremities, and the maximum strength of lower extremities was tested continuously and separately by SPSS23.0 statistical software. Flexibility and explosive force are statistically analyzed. Result: 1. The maximum strength test of lower extremity showed that there was significant difference between different test schemes and different time points (0.156, P 0.05). At 5 min, 10 min, 15 min was 0.194 (P 0.05). 0.007 (P 0.05) and 0.006 (P 0.05). 2. The flexibility test of lower extremity showed that there was significant difference between different test schemes and different time points (0.140, P 0.05). At 5 min, 10 min, 15 min was 0.007 (P 0.05). 0.027 (P 0.05) and 0.018 (P 0.05). 3. The explosive power test of lower extremity showed that there was significant difference between different test schemes and different time points (0.901) (P 0.05). Under different test schemes for 5 min, 10 min, 15 min was 0.370 (P 0.05). 0.572 (P 0.05) and 0.453 (P 0.05). Conclusion: 1. When studying the effect of static tension on the maximum strength test of lower extremity, the maximum strength value was not affected by the pre-test within 5 minutes, and within 10 minutes, the pre-test itself had a significant effect on the maximum strength value. 2. When studying the effect of static tension on the flexibility test of lower extremity, within 5 minutes, 10 minutes and 15 minutes, the pre-test itself had a significant effect on the flexibility value. 3. In order to study the effect of static tension on the explosive force of lower extremity, the pre-test itself had no significant effect on the explosive force within 5 minutes, 10 minutes and 15 minutes.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G808.1
本文编号：2483208
[Abstract]:Both before and after the competition, the stretching behavior of athletes can be seen everywhere. Static stretching is one of the most common tensile methods. On the one hand, the previous research on static stretching mainly focused on its influence on athletes' physical indexes, and the results were different. On the other hand, previous laboratory tests have used continuous testing to explore the effect of static tension on the index, without considering that the test itself is also a stimulus, which may interfere with the results. Objective: the purpose of this study was to test the explosive force, maximum strength and flexibility of the lower extremities of the subjects through moderate intensity stimulation, and to explore whether there was any difference between the continuous test and the separate test. Methods: in this experiment, 13 technical students of Beijing University of physical Education were subjected to medium strength static stretching of lower extremities, and the maximum strength of lower extremities was tested continuously and separately by SPSS23.0 statistical software. Flexibility and explosive force are statistically analyzed. Result: 1. The maximum strength test of lower extremity showed that there was significant difference between different test schemes and different time points (0.156, P 0.05). At 5 min, 10 min, 15 min was 0.194 (P 0.05). 0.007 (P 0.05) and 0.006 (P 0.05). 2. The flexibility test of lower extremity showed that there was significant difference between different test schemes and different time points (0.140, P 0.05). At 5 min, 10 min, 15 min was 0.007 (P 0.05). 0.027 (P 0.05) and 0.018 (P 0.05). 3. The explosive power test of lower extremity showed that there was significant difference between different test schemes and different time points (0.901) (P 0.05). Under different test schemes for 5 min, 10 min, 15 min was 0.370 (P 0.05). 0.572 (P 0.05) and 0.453 (P 0.05). Conclusion: 1. When studying the effect of static tension on the maximum strength test of lower extremity, the maximum strength value was not affected by the pre-test within 5 minutes, and within 10 minutes, the pre-test itself had a significant effect on the maximum strength value. 2. When studying the effect of static tension on the flexibility test of lower extremity, within 5 minutes, 10 minutes and 15 minutes, the pre-test itself had a significant effect on the flexibility value. 3. In order to study the effect of static tension on the explosive force of lower extremity, the pre-test itself had no significant effect on the explosive force within 5 minutes, 10 minutes and 15 minutes.
【学位授予单位】：北京体育大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G808.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 ellie;崔志强;;静态拉伸让身体更柔韧[J];体育博览;2010年09期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 傅志强;;MTS SINTECH 65/G静态拉伸系统CREATOR PRIVILEGE的应用研究[A];第五届全国MTS材料试验学术会议论文集[C];2001年
2 黄文;徐伟;夏源明;;SiC纤维动静态拉伸力学性能的试验研究[A];复合材料：生命、环境与高技术——第十二届全国复合材料学术会议论文集[C];2002年
3 杨柳;王霞;杨京芸;管常东;贾潇凌;;静态拉伸下调A7r5细胞IKCa1通道蛋白的表达[A];第十届全国生物力学学术会议暨第十二届全国生物流变学学术会议论文摘要汇编[C];2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 张洋;股后肌群静态拉伸对女子急停跳跃高度及膝关节负荷的急性影响[D];宁波大学;2015年
2 张杰;股后肌群静态拉伸对女性运动员侧切动作的生物力学即刻影响[D];上海体育学院;2015年
3 樊哲;静态拉伸对关节灵活性、肌力以及表面肌电特征的影响[D];沈阳体育学院;2014年
4 蔡健;静态拉伸后不同时间间隔对下肢力量和柔韧性的影响[D];北京体育大学;2017年
5 陈效;单轴拉伸装置中硅胶膜的应力分析及静态拉伸对ECV-304细胞形态的影响[D];重庆大学;2008年
，本文编号：2483208
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/tylw/2483208.html
