云南省教师吸烟行为及控烟知识态度

发布时间：2018-06-18 02:31

本文选题：吸烟 + 戒烟　；参考：《中国学校卫生》2013年07期

【摘要】：目的了解云南省大中小学教师吸烟状况、对烟草的知识和态度以及控烟教学活动开展情况,为指导开展无烟校园干预工作提供参考依据。方法通过三阶段随机抽样方法,在昆明、普洱和楚雄抽取27所大中小学的811名教师,进行面对面的问卷调查。结果云南大中小学教师的吸烟率、现在吸烟率和戒烟率分别为22.56%,16.76%和25.68%。男教师的吸烟率、现在吸烟率和戒烟率为52.8%,39.52%和25.13%,女教师的吸烟率、现在吸烟率和戒烟率为0.85%,0.43%和50.00%。在控烟教学活动中,大中小学教师在告知学生吸烟危害健康、教学生拒烟技巧、获预防吸烟的资料和接受预防学生吸烟的培训差异均有统计学意义(P值均0.01)。男女教师在教拒烟技巧和获预防吸烟资料方面差异有统计学意义(P值均0.05)。大中小学教师对尼古丁是引起多种癌症的化学物质、教师应是不吸烟的榜样、应在学校范围内禁烟和教师应指导学生拒烟或戒烟的知晓率/态度持有率差异有统计学意义(P值均0.05)。吸烟者和非吸烟者对低焦油低尼古丁的烟危害很小、尼古丁是引起癌症的化学物质、被动吸烟对健康的危害很小、吸烟成瘾是一种慢性疾病、教师应是不吸烟的榜样、应在学校范围内禁烟的知晓率差异有统计学意义(P值均0.05)。结论云南省教师存在不同程度的校园吸烟现象,且对烟草相关知识的掌握仍有不足。应普及教师控烟知识和技能的培训。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the smoking status, knowledge and attitude towards tobacco and the development of tobacco control teaching activities among teachers in primary and secondary schools in Yunnan province, and to provide a reference for guiding the intervention of smokeless campus. Methods A total of 811 teachers were selected from 27 universities and primary schools in Kunming, Pu'er and Chuxiong by a three stage random sampling method. Results the smoking rate, smoking rate and smoking cessation rate of teachers in Yunnan universities and primary schools were 22.566.76% and 25.68% respectively. The smoking rate of male teachers is 39.52% and 25.13% respectively. The smoking rate of female teachers is 0.8543% and 50.0013% respectively. In the teaching activities of smoking control, the teachers in universities and primary schools told students that smoking was harmful to health, taught students smoking rejection skills, obtained information on smoking prevention and received training on smoking prevention for students, and there was a statistically significant difference in P value between them (P < 0.01). There were significant differences between male and female teachers in teaching smoking rejection skills and smoking prevention data (P = 0.05). College and middle school teachers should be examples of non-smoking because nicotine is a chemical that causes many kinds of cancers. There were significant differences in the awareness / attitude holding rate of smoking rejection or smoking cessation between teachers and school students (P < 0.05). Smokers and non-smokers do little harm to low-tar, low-nicotine smoke, nicotine is a chemical that causes cancer, passive smoking does little harm to health, smoking addiction is a chronic disease, and teachers should be an example of non-smoking. There was significant difference in the awareness rate of smoking ban in schools (P = 0.05). Conclusion Yunnan teachers have different levels of smoking on campus and still lack of knowledge about tobacco. Teachers should be popularized in tobacco control knowledge and skills training.
【作者单位】：云南省健康教育所;
【分类号】：G478

【参考文献】