有人际关系困扰的大学生的内隐心理活动

发布时间：2019-04-28 05:59

【摘要】：目的:探索有人际关系困扰(ID)问题的大学生在人际交往过程中的内隐心理活动特点,为ID者的心理辅导与干预治疗提供理论指导。方法:选取329名大学生,使用人际关系综合诊断量表(IRIDQ)将其分成ID组(IRIDQ得分为15~28分,n=43)、普通组(IRIDQ得分为9~12.11分,n=50)和无困扰组(IRIDQ得分为0~3.76分,n=50)。采用GNAT(the Go/No-go Association Task)内隐联想范式和情绪STROOP范式测试三组在人际关系上的内隐认知、内隐情绪、内隐社交意向的反应时、击中率与虚报率(用于计算信号辨别率指数d')。结果:方差分析显示,在内隐认知、内隐情绪、内隐行为意向的平均反应时上,组别主效应均显著(均P0.001),进一步多重比较发现,ID组积极内隐认知反应时长于普通组和无困扰组[(594.2±17.0)ms vs.(533.4±15.5)ms vs.(503.3±13.9)ms;均P0.01],而消极内隐认知反应时则短于普通组和无困扰组[(554.5±18.5)ms vs.(600.6±28.8)ms vs.(610.4±19.8)ms;均P0.01];ID组内隐情绪反应时长于普通组和无困扰组[积极情绪词(442.1±18.5)ms vs.(415.6±17.5)ms vs.(395.7±12.9)ms;消极情绪词(434.3±17.5)ms vs.(390.1±13.1)ms vs.(389.8±15.5)ms;均P0.01];ID组内隐社交意向反应时长于普通组和无困扰组[(593.6±10.7)ms vs.(395.6±12.0)ms vs.(381.2±8.1)ms;均P0.01],而社交情境d'最短[(0.8±0.6)vs.(1.8±0.8)vs.(2.2±0.6);均P0.05)]。结论:人际关系有困扰者存在消极的自我内隐认知和情绪干扰,人际交往行为有退缩意向。
[Abstract]:Aim: to explore the characteristics of implicit psychological activities in the process of interpersonal communication of college students with (ID) problems, so as to provide theoretical guidance for psychological counseling and intervention therapy of ID. Methods: a total of 329 college students were divided into ID group (IRIDQ score 15-28, n = 43), common group (IRIDQ score 9-12. 11, n = 50) and non-troubled group (IRIDQ score 0-3. 76, n = 50). (IRIDQ) was used to divide them into three groups: ID group (IRIDQ score was 15-28 points, n = 43), common group (IRIDQ score was 9-12. 11 points) and non-troubled group (n = 50). The implicit cognition, implicit emotion and implicit social intention of the three groups were tested by GNAT (the Go/No-go Association Task) implicit association paradigm and emotional STROOP paradigm. Hit rate and false alarm rate (used to calculate the signal resolution index d'). Results: analysis of variance showed that the average response time of implicit cognition, implicit emotion and implicit behavior intention was significant (all P0.001), and further multiple comparison showed that there was no significant difference in the mean response time of implicit cognition, implicit emotion and implicit behavior intention between the two groups (all P0.001). The positive implicit cognitive response time in ID group was longer than that in normal group and non-disturbance group [(594.2 卤17.0) ms vs. (533.4 卤15.5) ms vs. (503.3 卤13.9) ms;] The time of negative implicit cognitive response was shorter than that of normal group and non-disturbance group [(554.5 卤18.5) ms vs. (600.6 卤28.8) ms vs. (610.4 卤19.8) ms;, P0.01]. The implicit emotional response time in ID group was longer than that in normal group and non-disturbing group [(442.1 卤18.5) ms vs. (415.6 卤17.5) ms vs. (395.7 卤12.9) ms;] The negative emotion words (434.3 卤17.5) ms vs. (390.1 卤13.1) ms vs. (389.8 卤15.5) ms; were all P0.01; The implicit social intention response time in ID group was longer than that in normal group and non-troubled group [(593.6 卤10.7) ms vs. (395.6 卤12.0) ms vs. (381.2 卤8.1) ms;] The social situation d 'was the shortest [(0.8 卤0.6) vs. (1.8 卤0.8) vs. (2.2 卤0.6; P 0.05)]. Conclusion: there are negative self-implicit cognition and emotional interference in the patients with interpersonal problems, and the interpersonal communication behavior has the intention of withdrawal.
【作者单位】：扬州大学教育科学学院;上海师范大学教育学院;云南师范大学心理系;
【基金】：江苏省教育科学“十二五”规划项目青年专项(C-a/2011/01/01) 扬州大学人文社科研究项目(YD2011/05/28) 上海高校大文科研究生学术新人培育项目(B-7063-12-001026)
【分类号】：B844.2;C912.1

【参考文献】