德国能力本位学习领域与澳大利亚能力本位培训比较研究

发布时间：2018-06-26 18:45

本文选题：德国 + 能力本位学习领域　；参考：《职业技术教育》2015年25期

【摘要】：德国和澳大利亚对能力概念的理解不同,德国对能力的界定主要指职业行动能力,强调职业行动能力各个组成部分之间重要的相互依存关系,能力被认为是一个整体的、相互依存的概念。澳大利亚对能力的界定更加关注技术和工作岗位能力,这些能力由于其模块化的特征,彼此之间相互独立。由于对能力理解的不同,德国能力本位学习领域与澳大利亚能力本位培训呈现出不同的基本特征。前者是基于培训职业而设计的系统化的跨学科课程,强调对技能型人才的系统化培养;而后者是基于岗位而设计的模块课程,模块之间相互独立、缺乏系统性,但灵活性强。两种模式各具特色,我国职业教育教学改革可以整合两种模式的优势,探索符合国情的改革之路。
[Abstract]:Germany and Australia have different understandings of the concept of competence, which is defined primarily in terms of the ability to act in a profession, emphasizing the important interdependence between the various components of the capacity for professional action, which is considered as a whole. The concept of interdependence Australia's definition of competencies focuses more on skills and job competencies, which are independent of each other due to their modularized characteristics. Due to different understanding of competence, the field of competence-based learning in Germany is different from that in Australia. The former is a systematic interdisciplinary course designed on the basis of training profession, emphasizing the systematic cultivation of skilled personnel, while the latter is a module course designed on the basis of post, which is independent of each other and lacks of systematicness, but has strong flexibility. The two models have their own characteristics. The reform of vocational education and teaching in our country can integrate the advantages of the two models and explore the road of reform in accordance with the national conditions.
【作者单位】：沈阳师范大学教育科学学院;沈阳师范大学;
【基金】：全国教育科学规划国家一般项目“20世纪90年代中期以来中德中等职业教育课程改革比较研究”(BJA100085),主持人:徐涵
【分类号】：G719.1

【相似文献】