中国特色社会主义与资本主义对待资本的异同

发布时间：2017-12-27 21:28

本文关键词：中国特色社会主义与资本主义对待资本的异同　出处：《学习与探索》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在生产力水平还不是很高的历史条件下,应当肯定资本对促进经济社会的发展有积极作用,但同时也要认识到资本对经济社会发展会带来负面影响。因此,在充分发挥资本的积极作用的同时要遏制其负面影响。资本主义充分利用资本的积极作用,但未能有效地遏制其负面影响。中国特色社会主义既要积极利用资本的作用,同时也要努力遏制其负面影响,要达到这一目的,关键是坚持中国共产党的领导。中国特色社会主义与资本主义对待资本的相同点都是充分发挥资本的积极作用;对待资本的不同点主要表现在三个方面:出发点和落脚点不同、经济逻辑不同、约束条件不同。
[Abstract]:Under the historical condition that productivity level is not very high, we should affirm that capital plays a positive role in promoting the development of economy and society, but at the same time, we must also realize that capital will bring negative effects on economic and social development. Therefore, the positive role of capital should be taken into full play and its negative effects should be contained. Capitalism takes full advantage of the active role of capital, but has failed to effectively curb its negative effects. Socialism with Chinese characteristics should not only actively utilize the role of capital, but also try to curb its negative effects. The key to achieve this goal is to adhere to the leadership of the Communist Party of China. The similarities between socialism with Chinese characteristics and capitalist treatment of capital are the positive role of giving full play to capital. The different points of view of capital mainly lie in three aspects: the starting point and the foothold are different, the economic logic is different, the constraint conditions are different.
【作者单位】：武汉大学经济与管理学院;武汉大学马克思主义理论与中国实践协同创新中心;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目(14ZDB030)
【分类号】：F014.39;F03;F123.9
【正文快照】： 在当前历史条件下,资本对经济社会发展有积极的促进作用。但也要理性地认识到,资本在促进经济社会发展的同时,也会带来诸多的负面影响。因此,在对待资本的问题上,不能顾此失彼,我们既要充分利用资本发展经济的积极作用,同时也要规避其负面影响。本文通过阐明中国特色社会主义(

【相似文献】