中部地区城镇化质量测度及时空演变分析

发布时间：2018-03-10 17:41

本文选题：中部地区　切入点：新型城镇化　出处：《南昌大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：新型城镇化建设的核心是以人为本,不再单纯追求数字和经济意义的进步而忽略城镇化“质”的提升,由“速度”过渡到“质量”是今后我国城镇化建设的重要方向。最近国家正式提出支持武汉、郑州建设国家中心城市,中原城市群和长江中游城市群的建设也在如火如荼地展开,都表明了中部地区城镇化建设越发受到国家关注。本文以中部地区为研究区域,根据新时期新型城镇化的内涵,从经济发展水平、社会事业建设、城乡协调程度、发展可持续性4个方面,构建用于测度城镇化质量的指标体系,利用熵值法对中部地区2002、2006、2010和2014年的城镇化质量进行综合测度,对结果进行分层比较以及探讨不同年份城镇化质量的层级变动,并借助Arc GIS将其结果进行可视化,为了探讨城镇化质量与4个一级维度指标层的对应关系,将4个一级指标层的计算结果与其对应年份城镇化质量值进行聚类分析,并探究不同年份不同子系统对于城镇化质量的贡献度,结论如下:(1)在所建立的指标体系之中,人均地区生产总值(E1)、人均地方财政收入(E2)、城市居民人均可支配收入(H1)、全市每百人互联网用户数(S6)以及农民与城镇居民人均生活消费支出之比(H5)这几大指标对城镇化质量的边际贡献最高。(2)城镇化质量的差异主要源于不同地区经济水平的差距,这一因素占据30%的比重,表明目前决定城镇化质量高低的关键因素依然是经济发展水平。城镇化质量的差距基本上在各个省份呈现中心外围的阶梯状差异,经济重心地带城镇化质量较高,反之较低。(3)城镇化质量的提升与各个子系统并不具有完全对应协调的关系,经济发展水平子系统对城镇化质量的贡献度均呈现下降趋势,而可持续性子系统的贡献度有所提升,社会事业建设子系统和城乡协调程度子系统的贡献度则处在波动起伏的状态。
[Abstract]:The core of the construction of new urbanization is people-oriented, instead of simply pursuing the progress of digital and economic significance, and neglecting the promotion of urbanization's "quality". The transition from "speed" to "quality" is an important direction of urbanization construction in China in the future. Recently, the state formally proposed to support Wuhan and Zhengzhou to build a national central city. The construction of the urban agglomeration in the Central Plains and the middle reaches of the Yangtze River is also in full swing, which indicates that the urbanization construction in the central part of China has been paid more and more attention by the state. This paper takes the central region as the research area, according to the connotation of the new urbanization in the new period. From the four aspects of economic development level, social enterprise construction, coordination degree between urban and rural areas, development sustainability, the index system used to measure the quality of urbanization is constructed, and the quality of urbanization in the central region of 200220062010 and 2014 is comprehensively measured by entropy method. In order to explore the corresponding relationship between urbanization quality and four first-level index layers, the results were compared and analyzed in different years, and the results were visualized by Arc GIS. The results of the four primary index layers and their corresponding year urbanization quality values are analyzed by cluster analysis, and the contribution of different subsystems to urbanization quality in different years is explored. The conclusions are as follows: 1) in the established index system, Per capita regional gross domestic product (GDP), per capita local financial income (per capita), per capita disposable income (per capita disposable income of urban residents), per 100 Internet users of the city (S6) and the ratio of per capita living expenditure of farmers to urban residents (H _ 5)). The difference of urbanization quality mainly originates from the difference of economic level in different regions. This factor accounts for 30%, indicating that the key factor determining the quality of urbanization is still the level of economic development. The quality of urbanization in the economic center of gravity is higher, whereas the quality of urbanization is lower. The promotion of urbanization quality does not have a corresponding and coordinated relationship with each subsystem, and the contribution of economic development level subsystem to the quality of urbanization shows a decreasing trend. The contribution of sustainability subsystem is improved, the contribution of social enterprise construction subsystem and urban-rural coordination subsystem is in the state of fluctuation.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F299.27

【参考文献】