教育资源对城市房价影响的实证研究
本文选题:房价 切入点:教育资源 出处:《江西财经大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:我国住房制度改革开始于1998年虽然起步较晚,但之后很快就进入房地产高速发展期,开始了房地产业真正意义上的发展。据国家统计局数据显示全国住宅商品房销售价格由2005年的2937元/平方米,上升到了2015年的6473元/平方米,增长了1.2倍,年平均增速达12.04%。房地产价格的过快上涨不仅会破坏房地产行业的健康发展,还会导致大量的资本从其他领域进入房地产行业,影响经济的健康发展。收入水平、土地成本、失业率等因素是影响房地产价格的诸多因素之一,除此以外还存在教育资源对房地产价格的影响。本文以我国34个主要城市为样本,运用Stata软件进行面板数据回归,分析了教育资源对房价的影响,这种影响具体表现在两方面:首先,不同类型的教育资源对房地产价格的影响程度不同,表现为基础教育资源对房地产价格的影响程度要强于高等教育资源对房地产价格的影响程度;其次,教育资源对房地产价格的影响程度存在区域差异。表现为:在经济发展水平较高的城市,中学教育资源的分布对房价的影响要强于经济发达城市,中学教育资源对房价的影响。以上结果对于现实的指导意义在于:一是政府在对房地产市场调控,保证市场健康发展的同时也应关注教育资源对房价的影响;二是要促进教育资源的合理分配,实现教育资源的均衡分布,实现经济发达城市和经济落后城市拥有公平、均等的受教育机会,三是在涉及到房地产评估的实际案例中,应该重点区分房地产周边教育资源的分布状况、类型。区分基础教育资源和非基础教育资源;区分经济发展水平存在差异的区域的教育资源。在房地产评估实务中给予不同的权重和分值,从而使得资产的评估价值更接近于公允价值。对于个人消费者来说,应该倾向于持有经济较发达城市中靠近中学的房产。
[Abstract]:Although the reform of housing system in our country started late in 1998, it soon entered the period of rapid development of real estate, which began the real development of real estate industry.According to data from the National Bureau of Statistics, the national sales price of commercial residential housing rose from 2937 yuan per square meter in 2005 to 6473 yuan per square meter in 2015, an increase of 1.2 times, with an annual average growth rate of 12.04 yuan per square meter.The rapid rise of real estate prices will not only damage the healthy development of the real estate industry, but also lead to a large amount of capital from other areas into the real estate industry, affecting the healthy development of the economy.Income level, land cost, unemployment rate and other factors are one of the factors that affect the real estate price. In addition, there is the influence of educational resources on the real estate price.In this paper, 34 major cities in China are taken as samples and panel data regression is carried out by using Stata software to analyze the impact of educational resources on housing prices, which is manifested in two aspects: first,Different types of educational resources have different effects on real estate prices, which are shown by the fact that the impact of basic education resources on real estate prices is stronger than that of higher education resources on real estate prices. Secondly,There are regional differences in the influence of educational resources on real estate prices.In the cities with higher economic development level, the distribution of secondary school education resources has stronger influence on housing prices than that in economically developed cities, and secondary school education resources have influence on housing prices.The guiding significance of the above results lies in: first, the government should pay attention to the impact of educational resources on housing prices while regulating the real estate market to ensure the healthy development of the market; second, it is necessary to promote the rational distribution of educational resources.To realize the balanced distribution of educational resources and to realize that economically developed cities and economically backward cities have fair and equal access to education, third, in the actual cases involving real estate evaluation,Should distinguish the distribution of educational resources around real estate, type.Distinguish between the basic education resources and the non-basic education resources, and distinguish the educational resources of the regions where the economic development level is different.In the real estate appraisal practice gives different weight and the score, thus causes the asset appraisal value to be closer to the fair value.For individual consumers, they should tend to hold properties near secondary schools in more developed cities.
【学位授予单位】:江西财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G521;F299.23
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 洪世键;周玉;;基于特征价格法的学区房价格外溢效应探讨——以厦门岛为例[J];建筑经济;2016年02期
2 徐梦洁;张周青;;城市教育设施对住房价格的影响——以南京市为例[J];开发研究;2015年05期
3 哈巍;吴红斌;余韧哲;;学区房溢价新探——基于北京市城六区重复截面数据的实证分析[J];教育与经济;2015年05期
4 周业安;王一子;;教育资源、教育政策对城市居住用地价格的影响——基于北京市土地市场的数据分析[J];中国人民大学学报;2015年05期
5 卢为民;张琳薇;;学区房问题的根源与破解路径探析[J];教育发展研究;2015年Z2期
6 刘润秋;孙潇雅;;教育质量“资本化”对住房价格的影响——基于成都市武侯区小学学区房的实证分析[J];财经科学;2015年08期
7 张周青;徐梦洁;;义务教育设施和非义务教育设施对房价影响的分析——以南京市为例[J];经济研究导刊;2015年20期
8 郑磊;王思檬;;学校选择、教育服务资本化与居住区分割——对“就近入学”政策的一种反思[J];教育与经济;2014年06期
9 王振坡;梅林;王丽艳;;教育资本化视角下“学区房”空间布局研究——以天津市中心城区为例[J];中国房地产;2014年10期
10 张浩;李仲飞;邓柏峻;;教育资源配置机制与房价——我国教育资本化现象的实证分析[J];金融研究;2014年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 赵艳;教育资源差异化对房地产价格的影响[D];浙江大学;2016年
2 周宇澄;教育资源对住宅价格影响研究[D];南京林业大学;2015年
3 王旭程;房价与教育资源关系的实证研究[D];中国科学技术大学;2011年
,本文编号:1707197
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjifazhanlunwen/1707197.html