“小产权房”规制路径新探——以存量“小产权房”的调控为突破口

发布时间：2018-05-10 11:03

本文选题：“小产权房” + 集体建设用地使用权　；参考：《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年02期

【摘要】：“小产权房”屡禁不止、存量居高不下,仅靠国家政策难以有效规制,存量“小产权房”何去何从正困扰各级政府。“完全商品化”会对商品房市场造成毁灭性冲击,完全拆除也不现实,而补缴土地使用权出让金或转归保障房更难以推进。这些解决路径都是基于“同地同权”这一理论基础的,实践证明均难以有效地解决“小产权房”问题。调整存量“小产权房”须基于“同地不同权”的社会现实与法律现状。有条件地确认“小产权房”的合法地位并不违反现行宪法和有关法律的意涵,构建独立的“乡产权房”市场是令“小产权房”走出困境的最优路径,这并不与“建设城乡统一的建设用地市场”相冲突,反而有助于该目标的实现和城乡统筹发展。
[Abstract]:The "small property right house" is forbidden repeatedly, the stock is high, only rely on the national policy to be difficult to regulate effectively, the stock "the small property right room" which haunts the government at all levels. "complete commercialization" will have a devastating impact on the commercial housing market, and it is not realistic to demolish it completely, and it is even more difficult to push forward by making up for the transfer of land use rights or transferring it to indemnificatory apartment. These solutions are based on the theory of "the same land and the same right", and the practice proves that it is difficult to solve the problem of "small property right" effectively. Adjusting the stock of "small property right" should be based on the social reality and legal status of "different rights in the same place". It is conditional to confirm that the legal status of "small property houses" does not violate the meaning of the current Constitution and relevant laws. Building an independent market for "small property right houses" is the best way to get "small property houses" out of the predicament, This is not in conflict with "building a unified market for construction land between urban and rural areas", but helps to achieve the goal and the overall development of urban and rural areas.
【作者单位】：武汉大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.181;;D923.3

【相似文献】