换位经历是否会促进换位思考:来自经济学实验的证据

发布时间：2018-05-12 19:10

本文选题：角色转换 + 信息披露　；参考：《世界经济》2017年04期

【摘要】：策略互动中经常出现偏离传统博弈论均衡的行为。本文通过在重复开展的两次最后通牒博弈实验中交换或固定决策者的博弈角色,并在开展决策前操控是否披露交换或固定角色的信息,研究实际角色转换经历及信息披露对策略互动的影响。研究结果表明,是否变换角色以及是否披露信息均对决策不产生影响,在策略互动中的实际换位经历并不会促进换位思考或改变策略互动中的决策。本文对所发现的现象提出了基于情感角度的可能解释。
[Abstract]:The behavior of deviating from the traditional game theory equilibrium often occurs in the strategic interaction. In this paper, the game roles of decision makers are exchanged or fixed in the repeated two ultimatum game experiments, and the information about the exchange or fixed roles is disclosed before the decision is made. This paper studies the effect of actual role transition experience and information disclosure on strategic interaction. The results show that whether the role is changed or whether the information is disclosed has no effect on the decision-making, and the actual experience in the strategic interaction does not promote the decision-making in the strategic interaction. In this paper, a possible explanation based on emotional perspective is presented for the phenomena found.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院;中国人民大学经济学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金(71303022、71503255) 教育部人文社会科学研究基金(13YJC790039)的资助
【分类号】：F224.32

【相似文献】