珠江—西江经济带城镇化质量的时空格局演变及其驱动机理研究
发布时间:2018-05-17 19:43
本文选题:珠江—西江经济带 + 县域城镇化质量 ; 参考:《广西大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着区域间经济与文化交流的不断加强,城镇化发展进程对我国现代化建设具有重大意义。为了更好地推进城镇化发展进程,以提升质量为主的城镇化转型发展新阶段已成为中国社会发展的必然。本文以城镇化发展阶段、增长极等理论为研究基础,认真梳理了城镇化质量、城镇化质量评价方法、驱动机理及流域经济带城镇化质量的国内外相关文献,认为城镇化质量是反映城镇化进程给城乡协调发展带来一系列变化的系统。本文以珠江—西江经济带63个县域单元为研究对象,从经济发展、社会发展、城镇化发展潜力这3个层面构建涵盖14个指标城镇化质量综合评价体系。首先,运用改进的主成分分析法计算63个县域单元在2005-2015年间的城镇化质量综合得分,再通过城镇化质量综合得分的Moran's I指数、人均GDP的分异系数、户籍城镇人口数量的Theil指数在时序上的变化分析城镇化质量的时序演变特征,结果表明:2005-2015年间,63个县域单元的城镇化质量综合水平存在明显的内部差异,但这种整体差异随时间的变化呈减小态势。其次,运用空间探索性分析方法研究城镇化质量综合水平在2005、2010、2015年的空间分异特征,结果表明:63个县域单元的城镇化质量综合水平一直存在明显的两极分化,上游区域存在大片的城镇化质量低值区,而中下游区域则零散出现城镇化质量发展的增长极。再次,建立了含有6个解释变量的城镇化质量驱动因子模型,并选择空间面板数据模型进行估计,结果表明:农业GDP占比、城乡居民收入比对城镇化质量产生负效应,行政力、市场力和内源力分别为提升城镇化质量的基础力量、关键力量和根本力量。最后,针对珠江—西江经济带城镇化质量存在严重两极分化的问题,本文从经济社会发展、基础设施和公共服务设施建设、提高人口质量等5个方面提出对策建议。
[Abstract]:With the continuous strengthening of regional economic and cultural exchanges, the development of urbanization is of great significance to the modernization of our country. In order to promote the development of urbanization, it has become a necessity for China's social development to improve the quality of urbanization in the new stage of transformation and development. Based on the theories of urbanization development stage, growth pole and so on, this paper makes a careful study of urbanization quality, urbanization quality evaluation methods, driving mechanism and relevant literature at home and abroad on urbanization quality of watershed economic belt. It is considered that the quality of urbanization is a system that reflects the process of urbanization and brings a series of changes to the coordinated development of urban and rural areas. In this paper, 63 county units of Zhujiang Xijiang Economic Belt are taken as the research objects, and a comprehensive evaluation system of urbanization quality covering 14 indexes is constructed from the three aspects of economic development, social development and urbanization development potential. Firstly, the improved principal component analysis method is used to calculate the comprehensive score of urbanization quality in 63 county units from 2005 to 2015. Then, through the Moran's I index of urbanization quality comprehensive score, the differentiation coefficient of GDP per capita is calculated. The change of Theil Index in time Series of the number of residents registered in cities and towns the time series evolution characteristics of urbanization quality are analyzed. The results show that there are obvious internal differences in the comprehensive level of urbanization quality among 63 county units from 2005 to 2015. But the variation of the whole difference with time is decreasing. Secondly, the spatial differentiation characteristics of urbanization quality comprehensive level in 2005 / 2010 and 2015 are studied by using spatial exploratory analysis method. The results show that the urbanization quality comprehensive level of 63 county units has been obviously polarized. There are large areas with low urbanization quality in the upstream region, while the growth poles of urbanization quality development are scattered in the middle and lower reaches of the region. Thirdly, the urbanization quality driving factor model with six explanatory variables is established, and the spatial panel data model is selected to estimate it. The results show that the proportion of agricultural GDP, the income ratio of urban and rural residents have a negative effect on the quality of urbanization, and the administrative power. Market power and endogenous power are the basic, key and fundamental forces to improve the quality of urbanization. Finally, aiming at the serious polarization of urbanization quality in Zhujiang Xijiang Economic Zone, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions from five aspects: economic and social development, construction of infrastructure and public service facilities, and improvement of population quality.
【学位授予单位】:广西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F299.27
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 涂正革;叶航;谌仁俊;;中国城镇化的动力机制及其发展模式[J];华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2016年05期
2 宫俊霞;邹滨;刘兴权;;1990-2010年湘江流域城镇化过程时空分异特征[J];资源科学;2016年09期
3 王爱忠;牟华清;;城乡旅游一体化发展模式及其实现机制——基于核心-边缘视角[J];技术经济与管理研究;2016年05期
4 徐辉;李宏伟;;“核心—边缘”结构下区域生产效率影响因素——基于西北地区面板数据的实证分析[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2015年12期
5 吴传清;万庆;;长江经济带城镇化发展的时空格局与驱动机制研究——基于九大城市群2004-2013年数据的实证分析[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2015年05期
6 蒋贵凰;钟少颖;刘亚清;;谈我国城镇化动力机制的演变及新型城镇化对策[J];商业经济研究;2015年05期
7 肖金成;黄征学;;长江经济带城镇化战略思路研究[J];江淮论坛;2015年01期
8 王新越;秦素贞;吴宁宁;;新型城镇化的内涵、测度及其区域差异研究[J];地域研究与开发;2014年04期
9 商立群;王守鹏;;改进主成分分析法在火电机组综合评价中的应用[J];电网技术;2014年07期
10 潘爱民;刘友金;;湘江流域人口城镇化与土地城镇化失调程度及特征研究[J];经济地理;2014年05期
,本文编号:1902613
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjifazhanlunwen/1902613.html