政治经济学批判视域下现代城市记忆的历史限度

发布时间：2018-05-27 02:10

本文选题：资本逻辑 + 城市记忆　；参考：《人文杂志》2017年09期

【摘要】：当下,资本生产通常以地理事件的形式凝结为拜物教化的城市景观。故而,以《资本论》及其手稿为理论始基的马克思主义政治经济学批判,需要升格为阅读资本城市秩序的空间性叙事。它揭示出三重辩证关系:第一,资本空间生产的共时态结构同城市地缘风貌的历时态变迁彼此形塑,且在货币之于土地属性的修饰环节中,成为扰动城市地理想象的消极因素;第二,资本自身形态的间歇性让渡和城市规划蓝图的拜物教愿景相互裹挟,并于实体资本虚拟化的趋势内,成为瓦解城市空间座架的始作俑者;第三,资本运转无法规避的阶级冲突与城市人群形色各异的空间身份有机融合,进而借助碎片化的生产关系的空间性再生产,成为动摇城市日常根基的否定性力量。应当说,嵌入城市空间结构但最终遭遇地理学瓶颈的资本辩证运动,可视之为消解城市文明记忆的异化过程。其实质,是解读城市发展轨迹的文化-政治性地理坐标,被资本逻辑预先设定的历史限度所遮蔽。换言之,在马克思经典论断的语境中,资本对城市景观的持续唤起无异于对现代城市精神的不断褫夺。
[Abstract]:At present, capital production usually condenses into a fetishistic urban landscape in the form of geographical events. Therefore, the criticism of Marxist political economy based on Capital and its manuscripts needs to be upgraded to the spatial narrative of reading capital city order. It reveals a triple dialectical relationship: first, the synchronic structure of capital space production and the historical changes of urban geographical features shape each other, and in the modification of currency to the land attribute, it becomes a negative factor that disturbs the urban geographical imagination; Second, the intermittent transfer of capital itself and the fetishistic vision of the urban planning blueprint are among the initiators of the collapse of the urban space frame in the trend of virtualization of physical capital; third, Class conflict, which cannot be evaded by capital operation, is combined with the spatial identity of urban people with different shapes and colors, and then, with the help of the spatial reproduction of fragmented production relations, it becomes a negative force that shakes the city's daily foundation. It should be said that the capital dialectical movement embedded in the urban spatial structure but eventually met with geographical bottlenecks can be regarded as the process of dissimilation of the urban civilization memory. Its essence is to interpret the cultural-political geographical coordinate of urban development trajectory, which is obscured by the historical limit set in advance by capital logic. In other words, in the context of Marx's classic judgment, the continuous evoking of urban landscape by capital is tantamount to the continuous deprivation of modern urban spirit.
【作者单位】：南京大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：江苏省社会科学基金项目“大卫·哈维马克思主义空间政治哲学思想研究”(16HQ002)
【分类号】：F091.91;F299.1

【相似文献】