合一性原则下招投标文件解释效力研究

发布时间：2018-08-31 16:26

【摘要】：招标文件和投标文件是在招投标过程中形成的特有文件,形成了合同内容的基础,是合同签订的依据。在招标文件和投标文件之间通过竞争机制,完成了对工程标的从范围、质量、工期、价款等方面的确定以及对承发包双方之间权利义务关系的确定。由于合同是规范双方权利义务关系的法律文书,因而招投标文件作为合同文书,实践中对招投标文件之间解释效力高低的设定直接关系着双方的利益得失及工程标的的建设。本文主要是从法律角度,基于合一性原则,对招投标文件之间的解释效力高低进行研究。本文对招投标文件之间解释效力的探讨以合同文件解释效力为载体,并将其整体作为合同的内容的一部分进行有效性分析。在此基础上从法律角度,推论出招标文件与投标文件之间的效力高低。基于此思路,本文首先对合同文件及解释效力进行了定义与分析,提出了效力的判断需要借助法律手段,在工程建设的法律体系下,提出了法律上的合一性原则。其次,提出了以契约自由主张的解释顺序作为合同内容发生效力时应满足的条件,借鉴FIDIC和我国示范文本中对合同文件解释效力规定具有的惯例效力,提出了合同文件解释顺序作为合同内容应遵循的效力理论。然后,对招标文件和投标文件进行了特殊性分析,提出了招标文件作为合同文件的不合理性,实践中合同条款里约定的招标文件效力高于投标文件所引起的法律冲突。最后,从反向论证出实质性响应招标文件的投标文件,在实质性内容上的解释效力高于招标文件是在合一性原则下形成的合同内容,具有法律效力。最后以工程案例的形式对其进行了实证分析。
[Abstract]:The bidding documents and bidding documents are the special documents formed in the process of bidding, which form the basis of the contents of the contract and the basis for the signing of the contract. Through the competitive mechanism between the bidding documents and the bidding documents, the determination of the scope, quality, time limit, price and other aspects of the subject matter of the project and the relationship between the rights and obligations between the contracting parties are completed. Because the contract is the legal document which regulates the relationship between the rights and obligations of both parties, the bidding document is regarded as the contract document. In practice, the setting of the interpretation effect between the bidding documents is directly related to the benefit of both parties and the construction of the project object. This article mainly from the legal angle, based on the unity principle, carries on the research to the bidding document between the interpretation validity high and low. This paper discusses the effect of interpretation between bidding documents and analyzes the validity of contract documents as a whole as a part of the content of the contract. On this basis, from the legal point of view, inferred the tender documents and bid documents between the level of effectiveness. Based on this idea, this paper firstly defines and analyzes the contract documents and the effect of interpretation, and points out that the judgment of validity needs legal means, and under the legal system of engineering construction, the principle of legal unity is put forward. Secondly, the author puts forward that the interpretation order advocated by the freedom of contract should be regarded as the condition which should be satisfied when the contract content comes into effect, and draw lessons from the customary effect of FIDIC and the interpretation effect of contract documents in our country's model text. The validity theory of interpreting order of contract documents as the content of contract is put forward. Then, the paper analyzes the particularity of the bidding documents and the bidding documents, and puts forward the irrationality of the bidding documents as the contract documents. In practice, the tender documents stipulated in the contract clauses are more effective than the conflicts of laws caused by the bidding documents. Finally, from the reverse argument, the bid documents in substantive response to the bidding documents, in the substantive content of the interpretation effect is higher than the bidding documents under the principle of integration of the formation of the contract content, with legal effect. Finally, an empirical analysis of the project case is carried out.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F284

【相似文献】