保险业进行营改增的效果研究
[Abstract]:Taxation is an important basis of modern public administration, how to achieve fair tax burden, improve tax efficiency, has always been the focus of national tax work. In 2012, in order to promote the healthy, sustained and coordinated development of China's economy, the implementation of an active fiscal policy, We will also speed up the adjustment and optimization of the tax system and the implementation of structural tax cuts, and China has comprehensively launched the pilot work of "conversion of profits to increase". The three-year pilot work has achieved the desired results, and by the end of 2015, the total tax reduction from conversion to construction has increased by 641.2 billion yuan. The overall tax burden of the pilot industries has fallen by 32%, and about 97% of the pilot taxpayers have already achieved tax cuts or even. In 2016, Prime Minister Li Keqiang explicitly requested in the work report of the Government to comprehensively implement the "camp change increase" with effect from May 1. The pilot will be extended to areas such as construction, real estate, finance, life services and so on, including the VAT included in all new real estate to ensure that all taxes are reduced and not increased. For the insurance industry, under the business tax system, the tax burden is heavy, and the insurance industry, which follows the trend of the reform of the financial industry, has also been brought into the ranks of the reform and increase, but the system upgrading and transformation of the insurance companies has not yet been completed, and the increase in the reform has not been fully implemented. The specific impact of the increase of insurance reform on insurance companies, the future tax rate, tax concessions, how to offset the entry tax and other issues will be related to the healthy development of the insurance industry in the future. There is also relatively little research literature on the expected impact of the increase of management reform on insurance companies. Therefore, on the basis of combing the previous studies, this paper studies the impact of business reform on the insurance industry. First of all, the related tax rate of insurance industry, the related concepts and basic theories of income change, including business tax, value-added tax (VAT), neutral tax theory, optimal turnover tax theory and tax burden theory, are expounded in the first place, including business tax, value-added tax and the difference between them. The theory of business tax system of insurance industry, the theory of value-added tax system of insurance industry and so on. On the basis of theoretical research, this paper analyzes the influence of the increase of business reform on the insurance industry. The increase in business reform will ensure the decline of tax collection, the increase of enterprise profits, and at the same time, it will bring about changes in the pricing of insurance products, marketing methods will also be changed, the change in the way of compensation will be the greatest impact, the entry tax deduction involves value-added tax invoices. However, most of the current mode of compensation is cash payment, which can not obtain the bill. After the increase of the operation reform, it must be readjusted, and the insurance reserve will also have uncertain changes. Based on the qualitative analysis, taking the PICC property insurance as an example, this paper quantitatively calculates the influence of the increase of the management reform on the insurance industry. It is found that after the increase of the reform, the price and tax of the insurance company are separated, resulting in the reduction effect of both the premium income and the indemnity expenditure. The decrease was 5.7 percent. In 2012 / 2016, insurance companies' value-added taxes and additional premium income fell 5.1, 5.28, 5.27, 5.27, 5.17 percentage points, respectively. The pre-tax profits, corporate income tax and net profit of insurance companies all increased by 89, 130, 110, 76.26 percentage points in 2012 and 2015, respectively. The profitability of the company has been significantly enhanced. The overall tax burden ratio of PICC property insurance for the five years from 2012 to 2016 also decreased by 3.85, 3.76, 3.73, 3.72, 3.83 percentage points respectively, greatly reducing the tax burden of insurance companies. In line with the original intention of camp reform and increase, but also verified the effectiveness of camp reform and increase.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F812.42;F842;F840.4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邢安仁;关于增值税几个认识问题的探讨[J];内蒙古财会;2000年01期
2 蔡军,奚国泉;增值税改革应重视纳税人结构问题[J];税收与企业;2001年12期
3 张炜;实施增值税改革相关问题的分析和研究[J];财政研究;2003年11期
4 张安东;东北增值税改革对建设项目经济评价的影响[J];中国冶金;2005年09期
5 胡娟;增值税转型:2006年宜铺开[J];经济研究参考;2005年87期
6 黄文;陈丽军;;公私权利的博弈——论增值税改革的理性基础[J];商场现代化;2006年09期
7 熊建军;;增值税改革试点及对企业的影响[J];审计与理财;2006年10期
8 胡勇辉;;促进企业自主创新的增值税改革方向[J];税务研究;2007年04期
9 张娥;庞亮;;增值税转型“增值”油企[J];中国石油石化;2008年23期
10 陈佩华;;对增值税转型影响的探讨[J];商业会计;2008年09期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 邓入心;;浅析增值税转型[A];煤炭经济管理新论(第9辑)——第十届中国煤炭经济管理论坛暨2009年中国煤炭学会经济管理专业委员会年会论文集[C];2009年
2 杨春梅;;增值税转型对煤炭企业的影响和应对思考[A];煤炭经济管理新论(第10辑)——第十一届中国煤炭经济管理论坛暨2010年中国煤炭学会经济管理专业委员会年会论文集[C];2010年
3 童锦治;李星;王佳杰;;关于增值税“扩围”的税率选择与居民消费变动的研究[A];2012管理创新、智能科技与经济发展研讨会论文集[C];2012年
4 胡春;;论我国现代型增值税模式的构建[A];2012管理创新、智能科技与经济发展研讨会论文集[C];2012年
5 孙彩英;刘益;;营业税改增值税对高校的影响[A];第三届教学管理与课程建设学术会议论文集[C];2012年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 本报记者 姚长辉;细说增值税[N];中国财经报;2001年
2 本报记者 崔帆;增值税转型一步到位 可能性小[N];财经时报;2005年
3 范海坚;增值税转型还转不转[N];中国税务报;2004年
4 刘建军;增值税扩抵缘何未达到心理预期[N];中国税务报;2005年
5 特约撰稿 左小青;增值税改革给市场带来什么[N];中国证券报;2005年
6 左小蕾;增值税改革令上市公司受益[N];东方早报;2005年
7 杨之刚 张斌;增值税转型改革的定位和推进[N];光明日报;2005年
8 张刚;增值税改革全国推开尚待时日[N];经济观察报;2004年
9 左小蕾;增值税改革的增长模式[N];经济观察报;2005年
10 本报记者 孙雷;增值税转型的三种可能性[N];21世纪经济报道;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 严才明;增值税的效率分析[D];上海财经大学;2006年
2 刘中虎;增值税的社会经济效应与“营改增”问题研究[D];武汉大学;2013年
3 刘希静;中国增值税流失研究[D];厦门大学;2007年
4 罗光;基于A-S模型的增值税逃税研究[D];华中科技大学;2007年
5 林聪;基于CGE微观模拟模型的增值税改革研究[D];华中科技大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王宇乐;保险业进行营改增的效果研究[D];上海师范大学;2017年
2 张智星;“营改增”背景下我国银行业增值税问题研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2017年
3 吕浩新;“营改增”对NF航空公司的影响研究[D];辽宁大学;2015年
4 李采假;营改增对A物流企业的影响及对策研究[D];辽宁大学;2015年
5 张隆;“营改增”对YD通信公司的影响研究[D];辽宁大学;2015年
6 高晨曦;清远市营业税改征增值税的效应评估[D];华南理工大学;2015年
7 王雪;“营改增”对建筑施工企业的影响及应对研究[D];兰州财经大学;2015年
8 李倩雯;增值税改革、股权性质与企业投资[D];南京理工大学;2015年
9 张玉洁;“营改增”对我国现代服务业的影响分析[D];云南财经大学;2015年
10 李昭;增值税扩围对企业价值的影响研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2015年
,本文编号:2475687
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/bxjjlw/2475687.html