当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 服务经济论文 >

多维邻近视角下生产性服务业与制造业融合影响因素研究

发布时间:2018-03-17 02:32

  本文选题:产业融合 切入点:多维邻近 出处:《广西大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:我国当前经济已进入增速换挡、结构调整的新阶段。如何通过服务业与制造业开展互动并实现产业服务化,对促进我国整体产业竞争力的跨越式发展具有重要意义。产业分工精细化、企业竞争加剧等问题的出现让单靠制造业企业本身的封闭式发展难以适应当下的经济环境,而与服务业企业的跨产业合作又是符合经济发展趋势的一条路径。首先,本文着眼于生产性服务业与制造业的产业融合影响因素,立足“多维邻近性”这一概念,分析相关的邻近性因素是否会对当下中国两种产业的融合产生积极的影响这一本质问题,力图在这一全新的研究领域中得到一些有效的结论。本文逐一深入的在上述本质问题的框架下分解成了三个小的研究问题:(1)产业融合过程中的多维邻近性概念;(2)邻近性因素对产业融合产生影响的具体路径是什么;(3)利用投入产出表和收集到的相关数据实证研究技术邻近、制度邻近和认知邻近对产业融合(包括正向、反向及分行业分析)的影响程度和“方向”;针对上述三个问题,本文分别在第一章、第三章和第四章中进行了必要的解释。本文得到的主要结论包括以下几个方面:一是本文研究的多维邻近内涵包括技术、制度和认知邻近三方面,技术邻近有利于知识共享与技术合作,制度邻近侧重于产业发展环境上,有有利于产业交流的规章制度,认知邻近则是产业或企业双方对未来自身发展及合作前景的考量;二是在产业融合影响路径上,技术邻近是动力基础,促成产业边界的技术创新;制度邻近是条件,提供了宽松的产业规制环境;而认知邻近则为过程也是前提条件,包含着产业替代关系的存在和竞争、需求的推动,三者是共同作用影响的;三是在实证分析中,技术邻近对产业融合的促进作用最大,认知邻近次之,制度邻近最小,此外,邻近性因素对产业融合的正向及反向融合存在一定的差异,对生产性服务业细分行业与制造业融合的邻近性影响因素分析表明租赁和商务服务业和金融业受邻近性因素的影响较大。最后,本文针对得到的实证结论,结合生产性服务业与制造业发展现状提出了相关政策性建议:一是健全政策法律体系,降低进入壁垒,二是开展价值链的分解与整合,实现协调发展;三是培养创新型人才,提高企业技术水平;最后是加强企业间合作,寻求合作共赢。希望通过这些途径让产业融合的作用得以充分发挥,进一步推动融合对行业(尤其是制造业)成长的促进作用。
[Abstract]:China's current economy has entered a new stage of speed shift and structural adjustment. It is of great significance to promote the leap-forward development of China's overall industrial competitiveness. The emergence of such problems as the fine division of labor in industry and the intensification of enterprise competition make it difficult to adapt to the current economic environment by relying solely on the closed development of the manufacturing enterprises themselves. The cross-industry cooperation with service enterprises is also a path in line with the trend of economic development. Firstly, this paper focuses on the factors affecting the industrial integration of producer services and manufacturing industries, and bases itself on the concept of "multidimensional proximity". Whether the related proximity factors will have a positive impact on the current integration of two industries in China is an essential question. Try to get some effective conclusions in this new research field. This paper decomposes into three small research questions: 1) the concept of multi-dimensional proximity in the process of industrial convergence under the framework of the above essential problems one by one. What is the specific path by which proximity factors have an impact on industrial convergence? using input-output tables and collected data to empirically study proximity, The influence of institutional proximity and cognitive proximity on industrial convergence (including positive, reverse and sub-industry analysis) and its "direction". The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: first, the connotation of multidimensional proximity studied in this paper includes three aspects: technology, institution and cognitive proximity. Technological proximity is conducive to knowledge sharing and technical cooperation, institutional proximity focuses on the industrial development environment, there are rules and regulations conducive to industrial exchange, and cognitive proximity is the consideration of the future development and cooperation prospects of both industries and enterprises. Secondly, on the influence path of industrial convergence, technological proximity is the power base, which promotes the technological innovation of the industrial boundary; institutional proximity is the condition, which provides a relaxed industrial regulatory environment; and cognitive proximity is also a prerequisite for the process. It includes the existence and competition of industry substitution relationship and the promotion of demand. Thirdly, in the empirical analysis, the technological proximity has the greatest effect on promoting industrial convergence, cognitive proximity is the second, and institutional proximity is the least. There are some differences between the factors of proximity and the positive and reverse integration of industry convergence. The analysis of the factors influencing the convergence of producer service industry and manufacturing industry shows that leasing, business service industry and financial industry are greatly affected by proximity factors. Combined with the current situation of producer service industry and manufacturing industry, this paper puts forward some relevant policy suggestions: first, to improve the policy and legal system, to reduce barriers to entry; second, to develop the decomposition and integration of the value chain to achieve coordinated development; third, to train innovative talents; Finally, we should strengthen the cooperation among enterprises and seek win-win cooperation. We hope that the role of industrial convergence can be brought into full play through these ways, and that integration will further promote the growth of the industry (especially the manufacturing industry).
【学位授予单位】:广西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F719;F424

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 吕慧文;王英;;装备制造业与现代服务业融合度测算[J];广义虚拟经济研究;2016年01期

2 张捷;陈田;;产业融合对制造业绩效影响的实证研究——制造业与服务业双向融合的视角[J];产经评论;2016年02期

3 刘祥恒;;中国旅游产业融合度实证研究[J];当代经济管理;2016年03期

4 李凌雁;翁钢民;;我国旅游与文化产业融合发展水平测度及时空差异分析[J];地理与地理信息科学;2015年06期

5 程永伟;穆东;;北京市物流业融合发展的低碳效应——基于全产业链的SDA分解技术[J];北京交通大学学报(社会科学版);2015年03期

6 余典范;张亚军;;制造驱动还是服务驱动?——基于中国产业关联效应的实证研究[J];财经研究;2015年06期

7 汪芳;潘毛毛;;产业融合、绩效提升与制造业成长——基于1998-2011年面板数据的实证[J];科学学研究;2015年04期

8 李宏亮;夏岩磊;;战略性新兴产业与生产性服务业融合发展研究——基于安徽省投入产出表的实证分析[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2014年05期

9 李薇;陈阵;;生产性服务业与制造业的融合特征——基于北京投入产出表的实证分析[J];管理现代化;2014年05期

10 黎振强;;多维邻近性对创新绩效的影响效应分析[J];内蒙古社会科学(汉文版);2014年04期

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 王成东;我国装备制造业与生产性服务业融合机理及保障策略研究[D];哈尔滨理工大学;2014年

2 胡金星;产业融合的内在机制研究[D];复旦大学;2007年

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 李婷婷;区域装备制造业与生产性服务业互动融合发展动力机制[D];哈尔滨理工大学;2015年

2 辛欣;文化产业与旅游产业融合研究:机理、路径与模式[D];河南大学;2013年

3 李慧珍;邻近技术扩散的效应与评价研究[D];南京航空航天大学;2013年

4 王德波;产业融合的经济绩效[D];暨南大学;2011年



本文编号:1622798

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/fwjj/1622798.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c0956***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com