我国服务业集聚对城市经济发展影响的差异性研究

发布时间：2018-04-05 11:37

本文选题：服务业集聚　切入点：专业化　出处：《重庆大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：关于产业集聚的相关研究，早期主要集中在制造业，随着世界经济由“工业经济”向“服务经济”转型，服务业集聚问题成为学者们关注的焦点。对于我国而言，服务业在国民经济中的地位越来越高，成为经济增长的新引擎，近年来服务业集聚发展问题也逐渐受到国内学者的关注与重视。本研究在归纳产业集聚相关理论、产业集聚测度方法的应用以及产业集聚效应实证研究的基础上，首先对我国服务业的集聚水平、城市经济发展水平与差距的现状进行度量与分析。然后分别构建服务业专业化和多样化集聚效应的计量模型，运用2003-2010年我国284个地级城市的面板数据检验服务业集聚对城市经济的影响。在考察了全国服务业集聚效应之后，再按照区域、城市规模的划分，检验集聚效应的差异性，并试图找到不同类型城市的最佳服务业集聚水平。通过实证检验，本研究得出以下主要结论。首先，服务业集聚水平的测度结果。服务业集聚水平低于工业，地级城市间存在区域和规模差异，且行业差异明显。其次，城市经济发展水平与差距的测度结果。其一，城市经济发展水平呈逐年上升趋势，且存在区域和规模差异。其二，城市经济发展差距呈缓慢下降趋势，差距产生的因素主要是区域内差异、第二产业的贡献以及集中性效应。最后，服务业集聚效应的差异性检验结果。第一，全国范围内，专业化和多样化的集聚效应均为正。第二，分区域来看，专业化、多样化集聚效应为正，且区域之间存在差异。第三，分规模来看，专业化集聚效应均为正，且大城市＞中小城市；而多样化集聚效应实证结果显示，大城市为正，中小城市为负。第四，分区域分规模来看，服务业集聚对经济发展的作用很大程度上取决于城市规模的大小：一是专业化集聚效应，所有城市的效应均为正；二是多样化集聚效应，，所有区域的大城市集聚效应为正，而中小城市集聚效应为负。第五，不同类型城市的最优集聚水平：东部、中部的大城市最优专业化集聚水平分别为5.6053、25.5955；西部大城市的最优专业化、多样化集聚水平分别为2.4715、7.5415。
[Abstract]:The related research on industrial agglomeration mainly focused on manufacturing industry in the early stage. With the transformation of world economy from "industrial economy" to "service economy", the issue of service industry agglomeration has become the focus of scholars' attention.As for our country, the service industry is becoming a new engine of economic growth because of its higher and higher status in the national economy. In recent years, the agglomeration and development of service industry has been paid more and more attention by domestic scholars.On the basis of summarizing the relevant theories of industrial agglomeration, the application of industrial agglomeration measurement method and the empirical study of industrial agglomeration effect, this study firstly analyzes the agglomeration level of service industry in China.The present situation of urban economic development level and gap is measured and analyzed.Then the econometric model of service industry specialization and diversification agglomeration effect is constructed, and the panel data of 284 prefectural cities in China from 2003 to 2010 are used to test the effect of service industry agglomeration on urban economy.After examining the agglomeration effect of the national service industry, the paper tries to find out the best level of service agglomeration in different cities according to the division of the regional and urban scale, to test the difference of the agglomeration effect.Through empirical test, this study draws the following main conclusions.First, the measurement result of service industry agglomeration level.The level of service agglomeration is lower than that of industry, and there are regional and scale differences among prefectural cities.Second, the level of urban economic development and the measurement of the gap.First, the level of urban economic development is rising year by year, and there are regional and scale differences.Second, the gap of urban economic development shows a slow downward trend, the main factors of the gap are regional differences, the contribution of the secondary industry and the centralization effect.Finally, the difference test results of service agglomeration effect.First, nationwide, specialization and diversification of the agglomeration effect are positive.Secondly, the specialization, diversification and agglomeration effect are positive, and there are differences between regions.Thirdly, in terms of scale, the specialized agglomeration effect is positive, and the large city is > the small and medium-sized city, and the empirical result of diversification agglomeration effect shows that the large city is positive and the small city is negative.Fourthly, the effect of service agglomeration on economic development depends to a great extent on the size of the city: first, the effect of specialized agglomeration is positive, the effect of all cities is positive; the second is the effect of diversification agglomeration.The agglomeration effect of large cities in all regions is positive, while that of small and medium-sized cities is negative.Fifth, the optimal agglomeration level of different types of cities: in the east and in the middle, the optimal specialized agglomeration level is 5.6053 / 25.5955, and the optimal specialization and diversification agglomeration level in the western big cities are 2.4715 / 7.5415, respectively.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：F719;F299.23

【相似文献】