金融发展对服务业增长的作用研究
发布时间:2018-04-25 02:10
本文选题:金融发展 + 服务业增长 ; 参考:《大连理工大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:20世纪60年代开始,服务业逐渐成为世界主要发达国家经济增长的主导力量,各国产业结构也呈现出"工业型经济”向“服务型经济”转型的总趋势。一直以来,我国政府都予以服务业高度重视,将加快发展服务业作为制定各项经济政策的重要导向。但是,多项促进服务业发展的政策并没有完全达到预期效果,我国服务业增长速度仍然相对缓慢,在三次产业中的比重仍然相对较低。因此,探讨服务业发展缓慢的原因及促进服务业加速发展的方法,受到了中国学术界的广泛关注。 已有大量文献证明了金融发展对以工业为主导的经济增长水平的促进作用,但关于金融发展对服务业增长影响的研究有限。这主要是因为在已有研究所处的时期中,工业是实体经济增长的主要拉动力。然而,在世界经济发展逐渐由以工业为主导向以服务业为主导转变的情况下,研究金融发展对服务业增长的影响将具有重要的现实意义。 本文结合服务业的本质特征和资金需求特点,从提供差异化金融工具和服务、促进新企业进入和产业集聚以及支持中小规模企业发展等角度分析了一国或地区金融发展对服务业增长的作用机制。将整个服务业分为金融和非金融两类部门,以金融部门规模、效率和结构指标衡量金融发展水平,并将金融部门效率和结构变化纳入非金融部门的生产函数中,通过构建两部门模型,研究金融发展对服务业增长的直接带动作用和间接溢出效应,并以2002-2010年我国31个省区的面板数据为样本进行了实证检验,结果表明:(1)在服务业增长过程中,资本投入的边际产出大于劳动投入的边际产出,是促进服务业增长的主要投入要素;(2)金融部门规模扩张对服务业增长具有显著带动作用;(3)金融部门效率变化对服务业增长具有显著的正向溢出效应,但溢出弹性较小;(4)以直接金融占比衡量的金融部门结构调整对服务业增长具有显著地负向溢出效应。
[Abstract]:Since the 1960s, the service industry has gradually become the leading force in the economic growth of the world's major developed countries, and the industrial structure of various countries has also shown the general trend of the transformation from "industrial economy" to "service-oriented economy". Our government has always attached great importance to the service industry and made the development of the service industry an important guide for formulating various economic policies. However, many policies to promote the development of the service industry have not completely achieved the expected results. The growth rate of the service industry in China is still relatively slow, and the proportion in the three industries is still relatively low. Therefore, the reasons for the slow development of the service industry and the methods to accelerate the development of the service industry have received extensive attention from the Chinese academic circles. A large number of literatures have proved that financial development can promote the level of industry-led economic growth, but the research on the impact of financial development on the growth of service industry is limited. This is mainly because industry was the main driver of real-economy growth during the period of existence. However, under the circumstances that the world economy is gradually changing from industry-oriented to service-oriented, it is of great practical significance to study the impact of financial development on the growth of service industry. This paper combines the essential characteristics of the service industry and the characteristics of capital demand, from the provision of differentiated financial instruments and services, From the perspective of promoting the entry and agglomeration of new enterprises and supporting the development of small and medium-sized enterprises, this paper analyzes the mechanism of the financial development of a country or region on the growth of service industry. Dividing the entire service sector into financial and non-financial sectors, measuring the level of financial development in terms of financial sector size, efficiency and structural indicators, and integrating financial sector efficiency and structural changes into non-financial sector production functions, By constructing a two-sector model, this paper studies the direct and indirect spillover effects of financial development on the growth of the service industry, and takes the panel data of 31 provinces and regions in China from 2002 to 2010 as a sample to conduct an empirical test. The result shows that the marginal output of capital input is larger than the marginal output of labor input in the process of service industry growth. It is the main input factor to promote the growth of the service industry. (2) the scale expansion of the financial sector has a significant driving effect on the growth of the service industry. 3) the change of the efficiency of the financial sector has a significant positive spillover effect on the growth of the service industry. However, the spillover elasticity is relatively small. 4) the adjustment of financial sector structure measured by direct financial share has a significant negative spillover effect on the growth of service industry.
【学位授予单位】:大连理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F832;F719;F224
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭文杰;;改革开放以来FDI、城市化对服务业的影响研究[J];财贸经济;2007年04期
2 田侃;马晓洁;段娜娣;;我国信用环境与现代服务业耦合关系的定量研究[J];财贸经济;2010年04期
3 张小蒂;王永齐;;企业家显现与产业集聚:金融市场的联结效应[J];中国工业经济;2010年05期
4 王志鹏,李子奈;外资对中国工业企业生产效率的影响研究[J];管理世界;2003年04期
5 杨龙;胡晓珍;;金融发展规模、效率改善与经济增长[J];经济科学;2011年01期
6 孙晓华;田晓芳;;装备制造业技术进步的溢出效应——基于两部门模型的实证研究[J];经济学(季刊);2011年01期
7 汪德华;张再金;白重恩;;政府规模、法治水平与服务业发展[J];经济研究;2007年06期
8 林毅夫;孙希芳;姜烨;;经济发展中的最优金融结构理论初探[J];经济研究;2009年08期
9 蔡跃洲;郭梅军;;我国上市商业银行全要素生产率的实证分析[J];经济研究;2009年09期
10 江小涓;;服务业增长:真实含义、多重影响和发展趋势[J];经济研究;2011年04期
,本文编号:1799280
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/fwjj/1799280.html