城市公用事业公私合作制的风险识别及其分担

发布时间：2018-03-05 06:14

本文选题：公私合作制　切入点：风险识别与分担　出处：《城市问题》2016年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国城市公用事业的公私合作制改革正在快速推进,在监测数据尚未完善的前提下,如何有效识别城市公用事业公私合作的风险因素,建立合理的风险分担机制,直接关系到公私合作制运行的成败。基于我国城市公用事业公私合作实践的典型案例,以跨案例研究法归纳得到15项风险因素,并依据来源和层级差异将其分为政府风险、市场风险和项目风险。研究发现,在特定制度背景下,不同层级风险存在着明显的关联特征:制度变动可催生政府风险,进而引发市场风险,造成市场环境恶化,最终导致项目风险。由于政府风险多由政府决策或行为偏差引发,这类风险应主要由公共部门承担。对于市场风险和项目风险,应根据风险起源确定归责对象,如果归责不清,可由公私双方共担风险或由第三方承保。
[Abstract]:The reform of public-private cooperation system of urban public utilities in our country is advancing rapidly. On the premise of incomplete monitoring data, how to effectively identify the risk factors of public-private cooperation of urban public utilities and establish a reasonable risk-sharing mechanism. It is directly related to the success or failure of the operation of public-private cooperative system. Based on the typical cases of public and private cooperation in urban public utilities in China, 15 risk factors are concluded by cross-case study, and are divided into government risks according to the differences of sources and levels. Market risk and project risk. The study found that under the specific institutional background, different levels of risk have obvious correlation characteristics: institutional change can lead to government risk, and then lead to market risk, resulting in the deterioration of market environment. Because the government risk is caused by the government decision or the behavior deviation, this kind of risk should be mainly borne by the public sector. For the market risk and the project risk, the target should be determined according to the origin of the risk, if the imputation is not clear, Risks may be shared by public and private parties or insured by third parties.
【作者单位】：山西财经大学经济学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金青年项目(71303208)——城市公用事业特许经营权竞标机制分类设计与管制政策研究
【分类号】：F299.24

【相似文献】