我国地级及以上城市城市化质量测度及空间差异分析

发布时间：2018-03-12 14:06

本文选题：地级及以上城市　切入点：城市化质量　出处：《华中师范大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：城市化质量是一个国家和地区经济发展及社会进步的重要见证,也是推进城市化进程健康发展的关键。本文在城市化质量内涵和评价指标体系研究的基础上,从经济发展、公共服务、生活方式和生态环境4个方面构建评价指标体系,依据2012年我国(除拉萨以外)287个地级及以上城市各指标数据,运用因子分析法对我国城市化质量进行测度,在此基础上进行分等定级和分析评价,并运用地理空间分析方法和空间分析软件,对我国城市化质量的空问差异性和空间关联性进行分析。最后运用多元回归分析和公因子得分分别对全国、东中西部地区及6个主要城市群的城市化质量的影响因素进行分析,并试提出提高城市化质量的对策建议。主要研究结果包括以下几个方面：(1)我国城市化质量总体水平较低,各城市之间差距也较大；城市化质量与城市规模之间呈正相关关系,城市化质量越高,城市规模也就越大；城市化质量与城市化率之间也是呈相对应的关系,即城市化水平高的城市,城市化质量也相应较高,但是二者在发展速度上并不协调,城市化质量发展滞后于城市化水平。(2)在空间分布上,我国城市化质量高值区主要分布在京津冀、长三角和珠三角及其他省会城市和直辖市,低值区分布比较分散,以中西部地区为主；东中西部地区城市化质量在空间差异上表现出由东向西依次递减的趋势,并且在局部地区城市化质量高的城市呈现集聚分布的现象。(3)空间关联性研究表明：我国城市化质量在空间分布上并不是完全随机的,而是在空间相似值之间表现出集聚性。局部空间自相关分析发现HH区主要分布在京津冀、长三角和珠三角等经济发达的地区,LL区主要分布在西部地区等经济相对落后的地区,HL区和LH区以中部地区为主,部分分布在西部地区。冷热点分析发现热点地区以京津冀、长三角和珠三角为主,次热点地区、次冷点地区和冷点地区由此依次向中西部地区扩展,这一现象与我国城市化质量由东向西依次降低的趋势相一致。(4)多元回归分析表明生态环境对我国城市化质量的影响最大,随后依次是生活方式、公共服务和经济发展。通过公因子得分的对比分析,发现东部地区影响因素主要体现在公共服务供给不足,中西部地区主要是经济发展水平落后；6个主要城市群的影响因素主要体现在部分城市群整体经济发展水平不高,城市公共服务供给不足,以及生态环境较差等问题。因此要想提高城市化质量,首先要以提高经济发展水平为前提,然后更多的关注城市生态环境的建设,重视城市基础设施建设和公共服务的提供,不断提高人们的生活水平和生活质量。
[Abstract]:The quality of urbanization is not only an important witness of the economic development and social progress of a country and a region, but also the key to promote the healthy development of urbanization. Based on the index system of public service, life style and ecological environment in 2012, the quality of urbanization in China was measured by factor analysis based on the index data of 287 prefectural cities except Lhasa. On this basis, grading and analysis and evaluation are carried out, and geospatial analysis method and spatial analysis software are used. This paper analyzes the spatial difference and spatial correlation of urbanization quality in China. Finally, by using multiple regression analysis and common factor scores, the paper analyzes the influencing factors of urbanization quality in the whole country, the eastern, central and western regions and six major urban agglomerations. The main results are as follows: (1) the overall level of urbanization quality in China is low, and the gap between cities is also large, and there is a positive correlation between urbanization quality and urban scale. The higher the quality of urbanization, the larger the scale of the city, and the relationship between the quality of urbanization and the rate of urbanization, that is, the higher the level of urbanization is, the higher the quality of urbanization is, but the speed of development of the two cities is not in harmony. The development of urbanization quality lags behind the urbanization level. (2) in the spatial distribution, the high value areas of urbanization quality in China are mainly distributed in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta, and other provincial capitals and municipalities, while the low-value areas are scattered. The quality of urbanization in the eastern, central and western regions showed a decreasing trend from east to west in terms of spatial differences. The research on spatial correlation of the phenomenon of agglomeration and distribution in cities with high urbanization quality in local areas shows that the spatial distribution of urbanization quality in China is not completely random. Local spatial autocorrelation analysis showed that the HH region was mainly distributed in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. In the economically developed areas, such as the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta, the LL area is mainly distributed in the central region of the HL region and the LH region in the relatively backward areas such as the western region, and partly in the western region. The analysis of the cold hot spots shows that the hot spots are Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, The Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta are the main areas, the sub-hot spots, the sub-cold spots and the cold spots are expanding to the central and western regions in turn. This phenomenon is consistent with the trend of decreasing urbanization quality from east to west in turn. The multiple regression analysis shows that ecological environment has the greatest influence on urbanization quality in China, followed by lifestyle. Public service and economic development. Through the comparative analysis of public factor scores, it is found that the main influencing factors in the eastern region are insufficient supply of public services. The economic development level of the central and western regions is mainly backward, and the influencing factors of the six major urban agglomerations are mainly reflected in the fact that the overall economic development level of some urban agglomerations is not high, and the supply of urban public services is insufficient. Therefore, in order to improve the quality of urbanization, first of all, we should take improving the level of economic development as the premise, and then pay more attention to the construction of urban ecological environment, the construction of urban infrastructure and the provision of public services. Improve people's living standards and quality of life.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F299.2

【参考文献】