统一市场监管与食品安全保障——基于“协调力-专业化”框架的分类研究

发布时间：2018-04-15 17:16

本文选题：市场监督管理局 + 食品安全　；参考：《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2016年02期

【摘要】：地方政府应单独设置食品安全监管机构还是实行统一市场监管,这是当前机构改革的重大争议。一般市场秩序与食品安全属性不同,西方国家普遍将两个部门分立。我国一些地方正组建市场监督管理局(委),整合工商、质监、食药等机构。研究的核心命题是,统一市场监管体制是否有利于提升食品安全保障水平?基于监管机构能力理论,以监管覆盖面和风险治理水平为维度,构建"协调力—专业化"分析框架,归纳出传统型、单一型、综合型和兼顾型四类监管机构设置模式。然后实证分析各地食品安全风险类型,并将其与机构模式相配对。理想的监管体制不是一成不变的,而应当针对本区域食品安全特征权衡协调力和专业化,使机构设置嵌入产业发展并与风险类型相兼容。换言之,统一市场监管并不必然提升食品安全保障水平。
[Abstract]:Whether local governments should set up separate food safety regulators or implement unified market supervision is a major controversy over the current institutional reform.General market order and food safety attributes are different, Western countries will generally separate the two departments.Some places in China are setting up market supervision and administration (commission, integration of industry and commerce, quality supervision, food and medicine institutions.The core proposition of the study is whether the unified market supervision system is conducive to improving the level of food safety and security.On the basis of the theory of regulatory ability, taking the coverage of supervision and the level of risk management as the dimensions, this paper constructs an analytical framework of "coordination and specialization", and concludes four types of regulatory institution setting modes: traditional, single, comprehensive and balanced.Then, the types of food safety risk are analyzed empirically and matched with the institutional model.The ideal regulatory system is not inflexible, but should be balanced against the regional food safety characteristics of coordination and specialization, so that institutions embedded in industrial development and compatible with the type of risk.In other words, unified market regulation does not necessarily improve the level of food safety protection.
【作者单位】：国家行政学院社会文化教研部;
【分类号】：F203

【相似文献】