要素市场所有制分割对制造业生产率的影响
发布时间：2018-08-04 17:12
【摘要】：1978年以来,产品市场的价格双轨制逐步被取消,到现在产品市场基本上是竞争统一的。相比之下,要素市场的发展进程比较落后,生产要素市场存在着严重的分割。学者们指出,我国要素市场存在着严重的扭曲,在不同所有制、地区、行业以及要素之间具有一定的差异。本文以此为背景,建立了要素市场所有制分割与制造业生产率的联系。基于1999-2009年中国工业企业数据库,文章以要素市场所有制分割为主线,分地区、分行业动态分析了要素市场所有制分割对我国制造业生产率的影响,得出如下结论：(1)地区层面分析,要素市场所有制分割的效率损失为10%-20%。行业层面分析,这一数值为2%-27%。(2)所有制部门内的要素价格扭曲程度大于所有制部门间的要素价格扭曲程度。(3)劳动的TFP损失值都大于资本的TFP损失值,可推导出,资本要素的价格扭曲程度大于劳动要素的价格扭曲程度。(4)研究期间,东部、中部、西部的TFP损失值整体上呈现出一种下降的趋势。无论是资本还是劳动,高新技术产业的TFP损失值整体上大于传统的劳动密集型产业。对于上述结论,本文做了进一步地解释和分析,并针对研究结果,提出了相应地政策建议。
[Abstract]:Since 1978, the double-track price system in the product market has been gradually abolished, and now the product market is basically competitive and unified. In contrast, the development process of factor market is relatively backward, there is a serious division of production factor market. Scholars point out that there are serious distortions in the factor market in China, and there are certain differences among different ownership, region, industry and elements. Based on this background, this paper establishes the relationship between factor market ownership division and manufacturing productivity. Based on the database of China's industrial enterprises from 1999 to 2009, this paper analyzes the effect of factor market ownership division on the productivity of manufacturing industry in China, taking the division of factor market ownership as the main line, divided into regions and industries. The conclusions are as follows: (1) at the regional level, the efficiency loss of factor market ownership division is 10-20. At the industry level, this value is between 2 and 27. (2) the degree of distortion of factor price in ownership sector is greater than that of factor price distortion among ownership sectors. (3) the value of TFP loss of labor is greater than the value of TFP loss of capital, which can be deduced. The degree of price distortion of capital factor is greater than that of labor factor. (4) during the period of study, the TFP loss value of eastern, central and western areas showed a downward trend as a whole. Regardless of capital or labor, the TFP loss value of high-tech industry is larger than that of traditional labor-intensive industry as a whole. For the above conclusions, this paper makes further explanation and analysis, and puts forward corresponding policy suggestions in view of the research results.
【学位授予单位】：大连理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F424;F224
本文编号：2164550
[Abstract]:Since 1978, the double-track price system in the product market has been gradually abolished, and now the product market is basically competitive and unified. In contrast, the development process of factor market is relatively backward, there is a serious division of production factor market. Scholars point out that there are serious distortions in the factor market in China, and there are certain differences among different ownership, region, industry and elements. Based on this background, this paper establishes the relationship between factor market ownership division and manufacturing productivity. Based on the database of China's industrial enterprises from 1999 to 2009, this paper analyzes the effect of factor market ownership division on the productivity of manufacturing industry in China, taking the division of factor market ownership as the main line, divided into regions and industries. The conclusions are as follows: (1) at the regional level, the efficiency loss of factor market ownership division is 10-20. At the industry level, this value is between 2 and 27. (2) the degree of distortion of factor price in ownership sector is greater than that of factor price distortion among ownership sectors. (3) the value of TFP loss of labor is greater than the value of TFP loss of capital, which can be deduced. The degree of price distortion of capital factor is greater than that of labor factor. (4) during the period of study, the TFP loss value of eastern, central and western areas showed a downward trend as a whole. Regardless of capital or labor, the TFP loss value of high-tech industry is larger than that of traditional labor-intensive industry as a whole. For the above conclusions, this paper makes further explanation and analysis, and puts forward corresponding policy suggestions in view of the research results.
【学位授予单位】：大连理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F424;F224
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 林毅夫;龚强;;发展战略与经济制度选择[J];管理世界;2010年03期
2 盛仕斌,徐海;要素价格扭曲的就业效应研究[J];经济研究;1999年05期
3 籍佳婧;;劳动力市场扭曲对我国服务业就业的影响分析[J];上海经济研究;2013年02期
4 徐长生;刘望辉;;劳动力市场扭曲与中国宏观经济失衡[J];统计研究;2008年05期
，本文编号：2164550
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/hongguanjingjilunwen/2164550.html
