记忆空间表达及其传承研究——以北京西四北头条至八条历史文化保护区为例

发布时间：2018-04-01 00:16

本文选题：历史文化保护区　切入点：记忆空间　出处：《现代城市研究》2016年08期

【摘要】：城市历史文化保护区作为记忆空间,与非历史文化保护区的区别之一是它承载着更多的集体记忆。这个集体不但是居住或工作在城市历史文化保护区内的人,还包括居住在历史文化保护区之外的人们。在这个逻辑下,城市才能将纳税人的钱投入到历史文化保护区上。以北京西四北头条至八条历史文化保护区为案例研究区域,分析了权威性和非权威性记忆空间、集体和个人记忆空间的表达和传承,分析了这两种空间为历史文化保护区保护方案制定的参考意义和局限。文章用地理学的尺度转换理论解释了个体记忆与集体记忆的关系,最后基于非表征理论,提出在历史文化保护区记忆活化的过程中,首先要打通权威记忆素材和个体记忆素材之间的界线,这样才能为个体记忆上升为集体记忆铺平道路。
[Abstract]:One of the differences between urban historical and cultural reserve as memory space and non-historical culture reserve is that it carries more collective memory. This collective is not only people who live or work in urban historical and cultural reserve, It also includes people living outside the historical and cultural reserves. Under this logic, the city can invest taxpayers' money in the historical and cultural reserves. Take the top four to eight historical and cultural reserves in Beijing as a case study area. Analyzing the expression and inheritance of authoritative and non-authoritative memory space, collective and individual memory space, This paper analyzes the reference significance and limitation of these two kinds of spaces for the conservation plan of historical and cultural reserves. The paper explains the relationship between individual memory and collective memory by using the theory of scale conversion of geography, and finally based on the theory of non-representation, the relationship between individual memory and collective memory is explained. It is proposed that in the process of memory activation in historical and cultural reserve, the boundary between authoritative memory material and individual memory material should be opened first, so as to pave the way for individual memory to rise to collective memory.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院;北京联合大学北京学研究所;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(41271152) 国家社科基金重大项目(14ZDBl39) 北京学研究基地课题(BJXJD-KT2013-TS01)
【分类号】：TU984.114

【参考文献】