建筑空间与音乐渐进中的对位关系

发布时间：2018-07-16 15:30

【摘要】：“建筑是凝固的音乐,音乐是流动的建筑”这句话虽然已经为人熟知,但是却很难有人能说明白它二者之间的联系究竟在何处。如果只是单纯重复美妙乐曲的话,是无法摆脱文学比喻这一领域的。对于建筑和音乐所具有的构筑性这一性质来说,人们是很难从正面来说明二者的关系的。本文试图通过分析其产生的语境和思维背景,并对建筑与音乐共通的历史源流进行发掘与梳理,探究在近代艺术体系下建筑与音乐的关系,以期能更好的把握建筑艺术的特征。那么,在理论上如何使研究建筑与音乐的关系变成可能呢?本文按照时间顺序,从古希腊一直追溯到现今的建筑学家丹尼尔·里伯斯金的“音乐·建筑”,试图论述建筑与音乐的关系。然而,在回顾过整个历史过程中的建筑与音乐的关系后,作者发现对于讨论建筑与音乐需要跨领域、多专业知识和发散性思维才能有所收获。因此,作者想在本文中着重展开将建筑和音乐联系起来的多种可能性,而不是单纯强制地把建筑和音乐放在一个领域,并从历史的角度来分析这两者之间的关系。另一方面,作者整理了历史上人们对研究对象持批判态度的言论分析,举出了几种研究方法,这就决定了本文的思路。除此之外,还有其它的研究方法和理论。例如,在风格主义时期,建筑与音乐的共通点:第一、无论是建筑还是音乐,它们都是脱离了文艺复兴时期常识的实验性质的尝试;第二、它们都被认为有依赖其他艺术的倾向等等。在这里需要指出的是,在研究建筑与音乐二者之间的关系时,要尽量回避文学上的类比方法,分析构造上或者是方法论上两者的关系,并且不要过分依赖于样式,而是应对所言及的对象进行具体的分析。因为太过依赖于样式,反而会导致随着研究的深入,使得样式成为研究的对象,就会喧宾夺主了。此外,还需要指出的是,本文是将建筑作为音乐的隐喻来研究的。当然也有将二者颠倒过来的说法,例如,柯布西耶“动起来的建筑”、松平赖晓“音乐是震动的建筑”等等。但是依作者的观点,如果将二者颠倒过来研究的话,建筑与音乐的关系就会变成研究建筑与由音乐转换成的建筑的关系,这样建筑本身就成为了自身比较的对象,研究的领域也就设定在建筑本身的领域了。因此,作者还是觉得将建筑作为音乐的隐喻来研究较为恰当(当然如果是在音乐领域来研究建筑与音乐二者的关系的话,颠倒过来当然是最合适的了)。通过对本文的写作,作者希望能让读者看出两种不同学科之间的交叉与渗透,对今后从不同角度认识世界,全面利用各方面知识起到一定的启发作用;另一方面作者也希望通过对建筑与音乐二者关系的阐述,能够有助于提高设计者对建筑整体设计的审美意识,并对思维的创新与开拓起到一定的催化剂作用;此外,作者还希望通过本文能启发读者产生更多建筑与音乐之间相互关联的共鸣,更期待能有音乐家将建筑空间转化为音乐。本文的不足之处:(1)对于资料的收集还不够完备;(2)本论文主要是从西方历史的发展来论证建筑与音乐二者的关系的,但是对于东方的理论,由于缺乏系统的文献可供参考,因此没有过多提及;(3)论文力图全面地看待影响中西方建筑构思的长时段背景因素和短时段背景因素,但事实上对于长时段方面略显不足。
[Abstract]:"Architecture is a solidified music, music is a mobile building", although it is well known, it is difficult for anyone to know where the connection between the two is. If only a simple repetition of wonderful music is simply repeated, it is impossible to get rid of the field of literary metaphor. In terms of quality, it is difficult for people to explain the relationship between the two. This article tries to explore and comb the historical origins of architecture and music through the analysis of the context and thinking background, and to explore the relationship between architecture and music under the modern art system so as to better grasp the characteristics of architectural art. How is it possible to make the relationship between architecture and music possible? According to the chronological order, from ancient Greece to the contemporary architecture scientist Daniel Libeskind's "music and architecture", the author tries to discuss the relationship between architecture and music. However, after reviewing the relationship between architecture and music in the whole history of history, the author sends it. In this paper, the author wants to focus on the multiple possibilities of linking architecture to music, instead of placing architecture and music in a single field and analyzing the relationship between the two in a historical perspective. On the other hand, the author has organized a history of people's critical attitude to the study of the object of speech analysis, a number of research methods, which determines the idea of this article. In addition, there are other research methods and theories. For example, in the style period, the common point of Architecture and music music: first, whether it is architecture or music, it We are all experimentation with the common sense of the Renaissance; second, they are thought to have a tendency to rely on other arts, and so on. It is necessary to point out that, in the study of the relationship between the two people of architecture and music, we should try to avoid the analogy method in literature and analyze the relationship between the structure or the methodology. And do not rely too much on style, but to carry out a specific analysis of the objects that they say. Because too much dependence on style will lead to the development of the study, which makes the style the object of research, and it will be taken into account. In addition, it is also necessary to point out that this article is the metaphor of the architecture as a metaphor for music. There is a reversal of the two, for example, Corbusier's "moving building", Song Ping Lai Xiao "music is a vibrant building" and so on. But in the opinion of the author, if the two are reversed to study, the relationship between architecture and music will become the relationship between the architecture and the architecture transformed by music, so that the architecture itself It becomes the object of self comparison, and the field of research is set in the field of architecture itself. Therefore, the author still feels that it is appropriate to study the architecture as a metaphor for music (of course, if it is to study the relationship between architecture and music two in the field of music, it is certainly the most appropriate). Writing, the author hopes to let the reader see the intersecting and permeation between the two different disciplines, to understand the world from different angles and make use of all aspects of knowledge in the future. On the other hand, the author also hopes to improve the overall design of the architecture by the exposition of the relationship between the two people of architecture and music. Aesthetic consciousness, and the innovation and development of thinking play a catalyst for the development of a certain catalyst; in addition, the author also hopes that through this article can inspire readers to produce more building and music interrelated resonance, more expected to have a musician to transform the building space into music. The inadequacies of this article: (1) the collection of data is not complete; (2) This paper is mainly from the development of Western history to demonstrate the relationship between the two people of architecture and music, but for the theory of the East, because of the lack of systematic literature for reference, it has not been mentioned too much. (3) the paper tries to take a comprehensive view of the long period background and short time background factors affecting the conception of Chinese and Western architecture, but in fact, There is a slight shortage in the long term.
【学位授予单位】：河北工程大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TU-854

【共引文献】