记忆空间活化的人本解读与实践——环境行为学与社会学视角

发布时间：2018-10-26 08:13

【摘要】：借由艺术作品引出对记忆空间的讨论,认为"记忆"与"地方"的概念不同于"历史"与物质环境实体,而因主客体统一更偏向于日常生活的空间。历史空间更多地是被建构出来的与主体脱离的客体,而日常生活空间却是肌肤相亲的真实存在。提出这样的观点是基于目前存量规划的场所营造和记忆空间实践中往往对方法和目标都不明确,既不能尽建筑学本体范围内之责任,又在主体性建构和政绩工程中迷失,而保护需要从历史的定义走向日常的活化。因此,存量优化时代重在营造而不在于重建,重在人本而不在于形态。最后提出,对人本主客体统一的诠释,可借由心理化的人、场景化的人和资本化的人而进行思辨,引出可以对营造实践进行深层次启发的设计本体论哲学意涵。
[Abstract]:Based on the discussion of memory space from the works of art, the author holds that the concepts of "memory" and "place" are different from "history" and physical environment entity, and that the unity of subject and object is more inclined to the space of daily life. The historical space is more the object which is constructed from the subject, but the daily living space is the real existence of the skin matchmaking. This point of view is based on the fact that the methods and objectives are not clear in the practice of site building and memory space in the current stock planning, and they are not only unable to fulfill the responsibilities within the scope of architectural ontology, but also lost in the construction of subjectivity and performance engineering. Protection needs to change from historical definition to daily activation. Therefore, the time of stock optimization focuses on construction rather than reconstruction, on human-oriented rather than on form. Finally, it is put forward that the interpretation of the unity of the subject and object of humanism can be speculated by the psychological person, the scene person and the capitalized person, leading to the philosophical implication of design ontology which can be deeply inspired by the construction practice.
【作者单位】：同济大学建筑城规学院;
【分类号】：TU984.114

【参考文献】