穗港澳三城历史环境特性比较研究

发布时间：2019-01-30 08:28

【摘要】：广州、香港、澳门由于其独特的地缘特征,是中国近代城市与西方文化互动,以及中国现代城市化进程起始的代表性城市。现代性与历史性并存的特征使得东西方城市文化的矛盾冲突以及城市特色的趋同性危机在穗港澳三城的发展过程中体现的尤为明显,而历史城区又是观察与探讨城市特色问题的理想研究地,所以本文在穗港澳三城中选择具有代表性的城市历史环境作为研究对象,以场所精神理论中的环境特性作为解读城市特色的切入点来展开研究。穗港澳三城都具有同脉相承的东方地域文化语境和高密度发展的商都特征,而与西方文化不同的交融方式和不同的发展契机为三城赋予了和而不同的城市性格,对三城进行比较研究,既能从个性上精准描述构成三城城市特色的历史环境特性,也能从共性上深入探讨东方城市文化在当代城市化进程中的传承与延续。本文分别从历史图像、城市建筑、市民生活、城市管理四种视野展开研究,构建了相互补充的比较研究框架。历史图像视野中对历史中的三城环境意象进行了图像学梳理,希望能够在历史大潮中寻觅出现存历史环境的前世印迹；城市建筑视野的研究以基于建筑学的研究方法,通过对研究对象的登录及分析,目的在于建构出一个穗港澳三城的历史环境特性框架,并通过对特性要素的类型学分析得到城市特色构建的经验与规律；市民生活视野借鉴了社会学相关研究方法,用以描述市民眼中的城市特色组成,从人本角度对三城历史环境特性进行了追问,以构成对城市建筑视野的比较型反思,并进一步进行了关于场所精神内涵的拓展思考；城市管理视野以文献分析作为主要方法,从城市风貌管理相关的法规文件对三城历史环境特性形成的影响进行比较,力图能够说明三城现状环境特性背后的城市管理客观管控因素。在对穗港澳三城的历史环境特性进行差异性比较的基础上,本文对三城历史环境的共性进行了总结,城市建筑方面而言三城有着高密度建设和高强度使用的基础共性；市民生活方面而言人情空间和多义场所是三城本质上的公共生活载体；价值取向方面而言重商务实的致用精神带来的是开放融通的商都氛围；文化诉求方面而言敢于创新又忠于传承的审美倾向引出的是法无定法,不拘一格的大美。进一步凝炼,三城的城市精神内核可谓是血脉中的人情味、骨子里的东方性。本文在比较研究成果的基础上,吸收香港、澳门的城市经验,为未来广州历史环境特色营造形成了四点建议：第一,在完善保存型保护的基础上进一步推进复兴型保护；第二,在遵循实体的完整性基础上进一步构建场所的完整性；第三,在建设人性空间的基础上进一步复兴人情空间；第四,在营造城市地域性特色的基础上进一步深挖东方性。希望借由以上策略在广州未来的历史城区保护和城市特色营造工作中再创地域文化的高峰,复兴岭南文化的辉煌,找到当代高密度城市语境下的东方文化传承之道。
[Abstract]:As a result of its unique geographical characteristics, Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Macao are the typical urban and western cultural interaction of modern Chinese cities, as well as the representative cities in the beginning of the process of modern urbanization in China. The characteristics of the coexistence of the modernity and the history make the conflict of the East and West urban culture and the same-sex crisis of the city characteristic manifest in the development of the three cities of the ears and the Hong Kong and Macao, while the historical urban area is the ideal study to observe and explore the urban characteristics. In this paper, a representative urban historical environment is selected as the research object in the three cities of Guangzhou and Hong Kong and Macao, and the environmental characteristics of the place spirit theory are used as the entry point for the interpretation of the urban characteristics. The three cities of Hong Kong and Macao have the characteristics of the cultural context of the eastern region and the high-density development of the same vein, and the combination of the different ways of blending with the western culture and the different development opportunities have given the city and the different urban character to the three cities, and the three cities are compared and studied. It can not only accurately describe the characteristics of the historical environment that forms the characteristics of the three-city city, but also deeply discuss the inheritance and continuation of the East urban culture in the process of the contemporary urbanization. This paper studies the four fields of view from the history image, the city building, the citizen's life and the city management, and constructs a comparative study frame which is complementary to each other. In the view of history image, the image of the three-city environment image in the history is analyzed, and it is hoped that the former western blot of the existing historical environment can be found in the historical tide. The research of the visual field of the city is based on the research method of architecture, and through the login and analysis of the research object, The purpose of this paper is to construct a framework for the historical environment of the three cities of Hong Kong and Macao, and to obtain the experience and law of the construction of the city features through the typological analysis of the characteristics. From this point of view, the author makes a question of the characteristics of the three-city historical environment, so as to form a comparative reflection on the visual field of the city, and further the development of the spiritual connotation of the place; and the view of the city management is used as the main method in the literature analysis. The paper compares the influence of the legal documents related to the city style management on the characteristics of the three-city historical environment, and tries to explain the objective and control factors of the urban management behind the present environmental characteristics of the three cities. On the basis of the difference between the historical environmental characteristics of the three cities of the ears and the Hong Kong and Macao, this paper summarizes the commonness of the three-city historical environment, and the three cities have the basic characteristics of high-density construction and high-strength use. In terms of the life of the public, the human and multi-sense place is the public living carrier of the three-city nature. In terms of cultural demand, the aesthetic tendency of innovation and loyal to the inheritance is the method of law and law, which is not unique. Further, the city spirit core of the three cities is the human and the oriental in the blood. On the basis of the comparative research results, this paper absorbs the urban experience of Hong Kong and Macao, and forms four suggestions for the construction of the future of Guangzhou's historical environment: first, the renewal-type protection is further advanced on the basis of improving the conservation-type protection; secondly, The integrity of the place is further constructed on the basis of the integrity of the entity; thirdly, the human-human space is further redeveloped on the basis of building the human space; and fourthly, the oriental is further developed on the basis of building the regional characteristic of the city. It is hoped that the above strategy will create the peak of the regional culture in the future historical urban area protection and the urban feature creation in Guangzhou, to revive the glory of the Ling 'nan culture and to find the way to inherit the Eastern culture in the context of the contemporary high-density city.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TU984.114

【参考文献】