基于博弈论的节能量保证型EPC合同决策分析

发布时间：2017-12-27 20:12

本文关键词：基于博弈论的节能量保证型EPC合同决策分析　出处：《运筹与管理》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：合同能源管理(EPC)是一种以未来节约的能源费用支付节能项目成本的节能管理机制。节能量保证型EPC模式中,耗能企业负责为项目融资,节能服务公司提供项目的全程服务并向客户企业保证一定的节能效益。若达不到承诺值,节能服务公司向客户进行补偿,若超出承诺值,客户给予节能服务公司一定的奖励。合同决策问题是该模式应用中的重要问题。本文以节能量保证型EPC合同中初始项目投资、合同期限和超额节能效益奖励的决策问题为研究对象,建立了客户和节能服务公司之间的决策博弈模型,分析二者的最优合同决策。数值试验结果表明,该方法不仅能让客户企业和节能服务公司均受益,还可以有效提高项目的投资报酬率,并且较高的节能服务公司技术水平和客户初始耗能水平能产生更高的节能效率。
[Abstract]:The contract energy management (EPC) is a kind of energy saving management mechanism that pays the cost of energy saving project with the energy cost of future saving. In the energy saving guaranteed EPC mode, the energy consuming enterprise is responsible for financing the project, providing the whole service for the energy saving service company and guaranteeing certain energy saving benefits to the customer enterprise. If the commitment value is not reached, the energy saving service company compensates the customer. If it exceeds the commitment value, the customer gives a certain reward to the energy saving service company. The problem of contract decision is an important problem in the application of this model. In this paper, we take the decision problem of initial project investment, term of contract and excess energy saving reward as the object of study in the EPC contract of energy saving, and establish the decision-making game model between customers and energy saving service companies, and analyze the optimal contract decisions of the two parties. The numerical test results show that this method can not only benefit the customers and energy saving service companies, but also effectively improve the rate of return on investment of the project, and the higher energy saving service company's technology level and the customer's initial energy consumption level can generate higher energy saving efficiency.
【作者单位】：中国科学技术大学管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金资助项目(70971123)
【分类号】：F206;F224.32
【正文快照】： 0引言节能减排是我国进一步发展亟待解决的问题。我国多数耗能企业节能技术和管理方法落后,导致能源利用效率处在较低的水平上。传统的节能管理方法通常是节能技术/设备的购买与自运行模式,这种方法存在很多缺陷。首先,业主不具备专业的节能改造技术知识和经验,在节能方案制定

【参考文献】