论双边市场条件下相关市场界定的困境及出路
发布时间:2018-02-26 05:22
本文关键词: 相关市场 双边市场 替代性分析 SSNIP测试 出处:《山东大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:相关市场界定是反垄断的起点。随着双边市场条件下反垄断纠纷的频繁出现,双边市场条件下相关市场界定问题成为了焦点。由于我国现行反垄断制度未对双边市场的相关市场界定问题进行规定,导致司法实践在相关市场界定问题上陷入了困境。鉴于此,笔者对双边市场条件下相关市场界定的困境进行阐述,并且在阅读域外制度和案例的基础上,提出自己对这一问题的解决思路。 文章根据“提出问题——制度概述——司法困境——域外经验——完善建议”的写作思路,对双边市场条件下相关市场界定进行阐述,文章分为五个部分。 第一部分为引言,介绍了本文的写作意义、文献综述和创新点。以奇虎诉腾讯滥用市场支配地位一案为切入点,提出了双边市场条件下相关市场界定这一问题。 第二部分阐述了双边市场的基本理论和相关市场的一般理论。与传统的单边市场相比,双边市场从产生机制、运行方式以及定价策略上存在着特殊之处。正是由于双边市场的这些特点,传统的相关市场界定方法无法直接适用到双边市场中,但是双边市场条件下相关市场界定又是至关重要的,因此该问题需要进行进一步的探讨,寻求相应的解决措施。 第三部分论述了我国双边市场条件下相关市场界定面临四种困境,即双边市场条件下相关市场界定的模糊化、孤立看待双边市场的子市场、替代性分析的随意化以及SSNIP测试失效。同时,该部分分别解释了四种困境产生的原因和弊端所在。 第四部分介绍了域外对双边市场条件下相关市场界定的制度和司法实践。笔者将对这些国家制度和司法实践展开论述。域外的反垄断执法机构在这些案件中对相关市场界定中充分考虑了双边市场的性质,分别从两个市场进行替代性分析,灵活使用SSNIP测试,并考虑对竞争的影响,这种处理方式对如何走出我国所处困境具有借鉴意义。 第五部分对我国双边市场条件下相关市场的界定提出建议。笔者在借鉴域外的解决方式和总结学者们的建议的基础上,对我国双边市场条件下相关市场界定问题提出了建议。
[Abstract]:The definition of relevant market is the starting point of antitrust. With the frequent emergence of antitrust disputes under bilateral market conditions, Under the condition of bilateral market, the definition of relevant market has become the focus. As the current antitrust system of our country does not regulate the definition of relevant market in bilateral market, In view of this, the author expounds the dilemma of the definition of relevant market under the condition of bilateral market, and on the basis of reading the extraterritorial system and cases, Put forward their own solutions to this problem. According to the writing idea of "asking questions-Overview of system-Judicial Dilemma-Extra-territorial experience-perfect suggestions", this paper expounds the definition of relevant market under the condition of bilateral market, and the article is divided into five parts. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the significance, literature review and innovation of this paper. Based on the case of Qihu v. Tencent abusing its dominant position in the market, this paper puts forward the problem of defining the relevant market under the condition of bilateral market. The second part expounds the basic theory of bilateral market and the general theory of related market. Because of these characteristics of the bilateral market, the traditional method of defining the relevant market can not be directly applied to the bilateral market. However, it is very important to define the relevant market under the condition of bilateral market. The third part discusses four kinds of difficulties in the definition of the relevant market under the condition of bilateral market in China, namely, the ambiguity of the definition of the relevant market under the condition of bilateral market, and the isolation of the sub-market of the bilateral market. The randomness of alternative analysis and the failure of SSNIP test. At the same time, this part explains the causes and disadvantages of the four dilemmas. Part 4th introduces the system and judicial practice of defining the relevant market under the condition of bilateral market. The author will discuss the system and judicial practice of these countries. The nature of bilateral markets is fully taken into account in the definition of relevant markets, The alternative analysis from the two markets, the flexible use of SSNIP test, and the consideration of the impact on the competition are of reference to how to get out of the dilemma of our country. In the 5th part, the author puts forward some suggestions on the definition of relevant market under the condition of bilateral market in China. On the basis of drawing lessons from the overseas solutions and summing up the suggestions of scholars, the author puts forward some suggestions on the definition of relevant market under the condition of bilateral market in China.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F123.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王晓晔;美国企业横向合并指南(续)——1992年4月2日发布[J];外国法译评;1996年03期
2 ;美国企业横向合并指南[J];外国法译评;1996年02期
3 李剑;;反垄断法中核心设施的界定标准——相关市场的视角[J];现代法学;2009年03期
4 韩伟;;美国《横向合并指南》的最新修订及启示[J];现代法学;2011年03期
5 丁茂中;;美国反垄断法中界定“相关市场”的临界损失分析法[J];西南政法大学学报;2008年06期
6 李姗,黄妍;注意力经济——网络营销的实质[J];湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年S1期
7 张志奇;;相关市场界定的方法及其缺陷[J];北京行政学院学报;2009年04期
8 杨东;;互联网信息服务市场支配地位的认定及法律调整[J];政法论坛;2012年01期
9 金朝武;论相关市场的界定原则和方法[J];中国法学;2001年04期
10 王为农;许小凡;;大型零售企业滥用优势地位的反垄断规制问题研究——基于双边市场理论的视角[J];浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版);2011年05期
,本文编号:1536685
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjiguanlilunwen/1536685.html