基于制度演化的我国PPP模式优劣势分析
发布时间:2018-08-22 15:08
【摘要】:改革开放以来,我国的经济持续快速发展,城镇化规模日益增大,但基础设施的建设相对于经济发展的需要和人民对生活水平提高的需求明显滞后,20世纪80年代PPP(Public-Private Partnership)模式的引入开启了我国基础设施建设新模式的浪潮,在一段时间内看似解决了我国政府对于基础设施建设的资金匮乏等问题,但由于当时我国进行相关项目运作经验的缺乏,各方面体制、机制尚不完善,且私人企业参与者缺乏项目稳定性、在进行PPP模式基础设施建设或提供相关服务时采取的机会主义行为,以及政府部门官员在与私人部门合作时的玩忽职守等因素,导致我国大量PPP项目的运营出现问题,政府部门与私人部门不得不重新谈判。在此情况下,政府基础设施建设资金短缺的问题非但没有解决,反而在很大程度上增加了PPP项目的交易成本,使得该模式在我国的运用遇到了困境。 近年来,随着我国国有企业综合实力的提升,大量基础设施建设PPP项目被授予国有企业的趋势非常明显,形成基础设施建设的PUP(Public-Public Partnership)模式。本文基于制度演化的视角,对促进我国PPP向PUP模式演化的影响因素进行分析和解释。 首先,运用交易成本理论等新制度经济学理论制度,分析我国基础设施建设模式演化路径依赖性;其次,对PPP模式的定义、发展、起源及我国PPP模式的引入背景和发展过程进行论述,并对我国PPP模式演化过程中出现的BOT、PFI等不同项目模式进行比较分析;之后,基于我国PPP项目案例,归纳总结我国PPP项目的失败影响因素,通过AHP方法提炼关键影响因素,分析关键影响因素对我国PPP向PUP模式演化路径的影响;最后,运用SWOT方法分析今后我国应用PUP模式进行基础设施建设的优劣势。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's economy has continued to develop rapidly, and the scale of urbanization has been increasing day by day. However, the need of infrastructure construction in relation to economic development and the people's demand for the improvement of living standards lag behind obviously. The introduction of PPP (Public-Private Partnership) model in 1980s has opened a new wave of infrastructure construction in China. In a period of time, it seems to have solved the problem of our government's lack of funds for infrastructure construction. However, due to the lack of experience in the operation of relevant projects in our country at that time, all aspects of the system and mechanism are still not perfect. And private enterprise participants lack project stability, opportunistic behavior in PPP infrastructure construction or provision of related services, and negligence on the part of government officials in working with the private sector. As a result of the problems in the operation of a large number of PPP projects in China, government departments and the private sector have to renegotiate. In this case, the shortage of government capital for infrastructure construction has not been solved, but has increased the transaction cost of the PPP project to a large extent, which makes the application of the model in China meet with difficulties. In recent years, with the improvement of the comprehensive strength of state-owned enterprises in China, the trend that a large number of infrastructure PPP projects have been awarded to state-owned enterprises is very obvious, which forms the PUP (Public-Public Partnership) mode of infrastructure construction. Based on the perspective of institutional evolution, this paper analyzes and explains the factors influencing the evolution of PPP to PUP model in China. First of all, using the transaction cost theory and other new institutional economics theories and systems to analyze the evolution path dependence of the infrastructure construction mode in China; secondly, the definition and development of the PPP model. The origin, the introduction background and the development process of the PPP model in China are discussed, and the different project models such as BOTPVI which appear in the evolution process of the PPP model in China are compared and analyzed. Then, based on the case of PPP project in China, This paper summarizes the factors influencing the failure of PPP projects in China, extracts the key influencing factors through the AHP method, and analyzes the influence of the key influencing factors on the evolution path from PPP to PUP mode in China. SWOT method is used to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of using PUP mode in infrastructure construction in China in the future.
【学位授予单位】:大连理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F283
本文编号:2197477
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's economy has continued to develop rapidly, and the scale of urbanization has been increasing day by day. However, the need of infrastructure construction in relation to economic development and the people's demand for the improvement of living standards lag behind obviously. The introduction of PPP (Public-Private Partnership) model in 1980s has opened a new wave of infrastructure construction in China. In a period of time, it seems to have solved the problem of our government's lack of funds for infrastructure construction. However, due to the lack of experience in the operation of relevant projects in our country at that time, all aspects of the system and mechanism are still not perfect. And private enterprise participants lack project stability, opportunistic behavior in PPP infrastructure construction or provision of related services, and negligence on the part of government officials in working with the private sector. As a result of the problems in the operation of a large number of PPP projects in China, government departments and the private sector have to renegotiate. In this case, the shortage of government capital for infrastructure construction has not been solved, but has increased the transaction cost of the PPP project to a large extent, which makes the application of the model in China meet with difficulties. In recent years, with the improvement of the comprehensive strength of state-owned enterprises in China, the trend that a large number of infrastructure PPP projects have been awarded to state-owned enterprises is very obvious, which forms the PUP (Public-Public Partnership) mode of infrastructure construction. Based on the perspective of institutional evolution, this paper analyzes and explains the factors influencing the evolution of PPP to PUP model in China. First of all, using the transaction cost theory and other new institutional economics theories and systems to analyze the evolution path dependence of the infrastructure construction mode in China; secondly, the definition and development of the PPP model. The origin, the introduction background and the development process of the PPP model in China are discussed, and the different project models such as BOTPVI which appear in the evolution process of the PPP model in China are compared and analyzed. Then, based on the case of PPP project in China, This paper summarizes the factors influencing the failure of PPP projects in China, extracts the key influencing factors through the AHP method, and analyzes the influence of the key influencing factors on the evolution path from PPP to PUP mode in China. SWOT method is used to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of using PUP mode in infrastructure construction in China in the future.
【学位授予单位】:大连理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F283
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭朝阳;赵耀;;胶东半岛滨海旅游资源规划与开发SWOT分析[J];北方经济;2007年10期
2 王灏;PPP的定义和分类研究[J];都市快轨交通;2004年05期
3 张万宽;;公私伙伴关系的理论分析——基于合作博弈与交易成本的视角[J];经济问题探索;2008年05期
4 胡振;刘华;刘佳力;;英国PFI项目的政府管制体系研究[J];建筑经济;2006年10期
5 王薇;戴大双;王东波;;广西来宾B电厂BOT项目特许经营者选择研究[J];科技与管理;2011年02期
6 周学荣;;英国公共服务改革及其启示[J];国家行政学院学报;2010年06期
7 乔立新;;建筑工程招投标中的信息不对称影响[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2008年02期
8 李潘武;宋胜男;陈幸斌;管宇;;基于SWOT分析法的BOT项目风险管理应用研究[J];价值工程;2012年32期
9 王亚军;;河北涞源矿山地质环境影响程度综合评价[J];矿产勘查;2010年06期
10 亓霞;柯永建;王守清;;基于案例的中国PPP项目的主要风险因素分析[J];中国软科学;2009年05期
,本文编号:2197477
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjiguanlilunwen/2197477.html