PPP项目中政府套牢社会资本问题分析
[Abstract]:PPP (Public-Private Partnership) mode is called public-private partnership, which is a long-term partnership between government and private investors in order to provide a certain product or service to the public. With the economic development of our country, the contradiction between a large number of infrastructure and public service demand and the limited financial ability of the government becomes more and more prominent, and the introduction of social capital in the field of infrastructure and public service becomes an effective way to solve this contradiction. As early as the 1980s, private capital participated in the infrastructure construction of our country in the mode of BOT and so on. With the coming into power of the new government, in order to cope with the debt crisis of local governments and the downward pressure of the economy, the government's push to the PPP has been continuously increased. However, the market reflects the "uneven balance of cold and heat". Compared with the initiative of the government, social capital is hesitant. And the risk of the government is one of the important reasons of social capital hesitancy. Based on the previous research and analysis, this paper firstly combs the PPP model and the relevant theory of the problem. Then it analyzes the mechanism of the problem of government entrapment in the PPP project from the aspects of the specificity of the assets the incompleteness of the contract and the opportunistic behavior of the government in the PPP project. On the basis of the previous analysis, using the method of dynamic game, this paper constructs a game locking model between the government and private investors in PPP project, and discusses the conditions for the government to choose to hold private investors. Compare the efforts of private investors under different equilibrium paths. Combined with the analysis results and the classical governance of the locking problem, the corresponding countermeasures are provided for solving the latch problem. Under the background of popularizing the PPP model in China, it is of positive significance to study the "pain point" of "government holding private investors" in the PPP project.
【学位授予单位】:西南交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:F283
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 董晓常;;Tom接手eBay中国?[J];互联网周刊;2006年33期
2 李益群;;议BOT项目政府保证责任[J];企业家天地;2009年09期
3 王书灏;王卓甫;;私人投资者在基础设施PPP项目中的若干问题研究[J];建筑经济;2009年12期
4 胡舜媛;印度考虑核电私有化[J];国外核新闻;1997年06期
5 张卫卫;;今年下半年PE配置将迎来利好环境[J];新民周刊;2014年25期
6 刘夷静;BOT融资方式是海南投资开发的现实选择[J];特区展望;1995年06期
7 ;数一数二[J];中国海关;2003年05期
8 ;英国将对空管服务进行私有化[J];民航经济与技术;1998年09期
9 程漱兰;公共服务体制创新对私人投资者的含义——世界银行2004年世界发展报告[J];中国投资;2004年10期
10 ;市场[J];中国高新技术企业;2004年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 王刘芳;低价产权项目吸引私人投资者[N];北京日报;2007年
2 早报记者 肖中洁;欧盟救助希腊一锤难定:“欢迎私人投资者救助希腊”[N];东方早报;2011年
3 记者 莫莉;希腊债务减计谈判进入冲刺阶段[N];金融时报;2012年
4 郭信麟;国有化才是唯一出路[N];中国证券报;2009年
5 中国政法大学教授 朱伟一;希腊这回真悬了[N];上海证券报;2011年
6 马建国;英国共同基金遭遇撤资风潮,还可能加剧[N];新华每日电讯;2008年
7 Simon Lrvine邋方丽娟;政府在国际项目中扮演什么角色[N];建筑时报;2007年
8 特派记者 师琰;欧盟财长会再议“防火墙” 避免希腊债重组“坏榜样”[N];21世纪经济报道;2012年
9 记者 刘晓燕;近忧暂缓,远虑难消[N];新华每日电讯;2011年
10 特派记者 袁雪;希腊债务违约几成定局 未来几周市场将“面临动荡”[N];21世纪经济报道;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 杨一;BOT项目中的征收问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2016年
2 代中胜;PPP项目中政府套牢社会资本问题分析[D];西南交通大学;2015年
,本文编号:2250221
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjiguanlilunwen/2250221.html