垄断资本主义批判与马克思主义的当代生命力——纪念马克思逝世130周年

发布时间：2018-04-04 23:24

本文选题：垄断资本主义　切入点：剩余价值　出处：《理论视野》2013年06期

【摘要】：自列宁《帝国主义论》发表以来,垄断资本主义批判就成了国外激进思潮研究的核心主题。然而,纵观这些流派,它们在理论根基上已经抛弃了马克思主义的立场、观点和方法,实现了批判逻辑或政治立场的"后马克思"转向:首先,美国激进政治经济学家巴兰和斯威齐通过对垄断资本主义的分析,彻底否定了马克思的剩余价值理论,实现了政治经济学批判的"后马克思"转向;其次,奈格里和哈特通过对帝国时代的非物质劳动与生命政治的研究,修正了马克思的物质生产逻辑,实现了政治哲学的"后马克思"转向;再次,法国共产党通过对国家垄断资本主义的分析,提出了和平长入社会主义的民主路线,实现了政治立场的"后马克思"转向。这三者分别对应于马克思的政治经济学、历史唯物主义和科学社会主义,因此,如何从当代视域出发,全面揭示马克思主义的整体性和当代生命力,捍卫马克思主义的科学性,就具有至关重要的理论意义和现实价值。
[Abstract]:Since Lenin's imperialist theory was published, the criticism of monopoly capitalism has become the core theme of foreign radical thoughts.However, looking at these schools of thought, they have abandoned Marxist positions, views and methods on the theoretical basis and achieved a "post-Marx" turn of critical logic or political stance: first,By analyzing monopoly capitalism, radical American political economists Balan and Swizzi completely deny Marx's theory of surplus value and realize the "post-Marx" turn of political economics criticism.Through the study of immaterial labor and life politics in the imperial era, Negree and Hart revised Marx's logic of material production and realized the "post-Marx" turn of political philosophy.Through the analysis of state monopoly capitalism, the Communist Party of France put forward the democratic line of peaceful growth into socialism, and realized the "post-Marx" turn of political stand.These three correspond to Marx's political economy, historical materialism and scientific socialism respectively. Therefore, how to fully reveal the integrity and contemporary vitality of Marxism from the contemporary perspective, and safeguard the scientific nature of Marxism,It has important theoretical significance and practical value.
【作者单位】：南京大学马克思主义社会理论研究中心暨哲学系;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目(12CZX002) 江苏省社科基金青年项目(11ZXC009) 南京大学文科基金重点项目的阶段性成果
【分类号】：A811.6;F091.4

【共引文献】