区域科学发展不同评价体系比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-11 10:39

本文选题：区域科学发展 + 评价指标　；参考：《中国人口.资源与环境》2011年04期

【摘要】：构建区域科学发展评价体系需要解决区域发展要素协同演化的综合测度问题,通过利益统筹引导区域资源和谐配置。现有不同评价体系在设计原理、指标构成、数据处理与权重分配方面具有差异性,但评价结果具有相似性。它们的共性之处在于:以五个统筹为基础,逻辑主线是调解人与人之间、人与自然之间的矛盾;大多采用层次分析法和模糊数学法,不能反映出指标之间的包含关系、相关关系以及逻辑关系,可能导致具有高度相关性的指标被重复使用;仅适合一般区域评价,不适合特定区域评价;评价方法较为单一、评价指标设置过多、以人为本的思想尚未充分体现。本文提出了进一步的研究内容:以实现包容性增长为目标构建区域发展要素资本体系;指标的内在逻辑关系围绕经济学模式、社会学模式、生态学模式展开;并将区域可比性、区域特殊性、区域层次性、发展潜力性、指标前瞻性等纳入评价体系的范畴。
[Abstract]:To construct the evaluation system of regional scientific development, it is necessary to solve the problem of comprehensive measurement of the co-evolution of regional development elements, and guide the harmonious allocation of regional resources through the coordination of interests.There are differences in design principle, index constitution, data processing and weight distribution among different evaluation systems, but the evaluation results are similar.Their commonness lies in the fact that, based on the five overall plans, the logical main line is the contradiction between mediators and people, between man and nature; most of them adopt AHP and fuzzy mathematics, which cannot reflect the inclusive relationship between indicators.Correlation and logic may lead to the reuse of highly relevant indicators; only suitable for general regional evaluation, not for specific regional evaluation; evaluation method is single, evaluation indicators are set too much,People-oriented thought has not been fully reflected.This paper puts forward further research contents: to achieve inclusive growth as the goal to build regional development factor capital system; the intrinsic logical relationship of indicators around the economic model, sociological model, ecological model, and regional comparability,Regional particularity, regional hierarchy, development potential and index foresight are included in the evaluation system.
【作者单位】：成都理工大学管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(编号:09XJY002)
【分类号】：F061.5

【参考文献】