东部省市城镇居民消费水平与消费结构省际差异研究

发布时间：2018-05-11 19:20

本文选题：东部省市城镇居民消费 + 省际差异　；参考：《浙江工商大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：改革开放以来,中国经济取得了骄人的成绩,但也出现了地区间、行业间、不同群体之间贫富差距持续扩大的问题。伴随着居民总体消费水平的提高,消费的省际差异问题也日益突出,因此,经济发展中的消费差异问题值得我们做深入的研究。东部省市作为我国经济相对发达的区域,内部各省市之间的消费差异也是不容忽视的,消费差距过大不利于区域整体经济的发展。城镇居民作为消费主体,其消费特色具有较强的窗口及示范作用。通过研究东部城镇居民消费水平与消费结构差异,有助于认识区域内消费差距,对实现区域经济协调发展,保持区域整体竞争力有重要作用。因此,本文以东部省市城镇居民为研究对象,在简要分析东部省市城镇居民消费水平差异的基础上,重点分析消费结构的省际差异。(1)对于消费水平省际差异的研究。首先,基于单指标体系中的标准差与变异系数指标,分析了其在2001-2014年期间区域差异的发展规律;其次,采用综合指标体系中的因子分析法对2014年东部各省市城镇居民的综合消费水平差异进行了探讨。(2)对于消费结构省际差异的分析。首先基于广义熵、均衡度与优势度等指标测算了东部各省市城镇居民在2001-2014年期间的消费质量,并基于变异系数分析了消费质量差异的演变趋势;然后通过构建基于横截面数据的ELES模型,重点分析了 2014年东部各省市城镇居民消费结构受收入、价格变化影响的差异。通过上述两方面的研究,旨在挖掘消费水平较低省市城镇居民的消费潜力,缩小区域差距。研究结果表明:(1)东部省市城镇居民消费水平相对差异在2001-2014年期间总体是下降的,但相对差异值呈现出不规则的波峰与波谷交替出现的规律。将东部各省市城镇居民按照综合因子得分排序为:北京、上海、浙江、广东、江苏、福建、天津、海南、辽宁、山东、河北,此排名清晰地呈现了各省市城镇居民消费水平在东部区域内的相对地位。(2)2001-2014年间,东部省市城镇居民消费质量差异表现出稳定性特征。变异系数变化幅度较小,范围限定在2.5%-3.5%之间,变异系数最大值为2005年的3.34%,最小值为2003年的2.56%。(3)东部省市城镇居民消费结构受收入变化的影响表现出趋同性与异质性并存的现象。趋同性体现在东部各省市城镇居民在食品、衣着、家庭设备用品与服务、医疗保健等方面均缺乏弹性;在居住类、其它商品与服务类方面均富有弹性。异质性方面,海南、辽宁、广东、江苏在交通通讯方面均表现出缺乏弹性,其它省市为富有弹性;海南、山东、福建、广东、浙江等在文教娱乐方面为富有弹性,其它省市则表现为缺乏弹性。(4)东部省市城镇居民消费结构受价格变化的影响呈现出趋同性。具体表现在居住类、其它商品与服务类等方面,东部各省市城镇居民自价格弹性绝对值均大于1,富有弹性;而在食品、衣着、家庭设备用品与服务、医疗保健、交通通讯、文教娱乐等方面的自价格弹性绝对值均小于1,缺乏弹性。最后,针对上述研究结论,本文就如何提高区域整体竞争力提出了几点建议,为加快城镇居民共享改革成果提供帮助。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's economy has made remarkable achievements, but the gap between the rich and the poor continues to expand among regions, industries and different groups. With the improvement of the overall consumption level of the residents, the problem of inter provincial differences in consumption has become increasingly prominent. Therefore, the problem of consumption differences in the economic development is worth further research. As a relatively developed region of China's economy, the consumption difference between the provinces and cities in the East can not be ignored. The excessive consumption gap is not conducive to the development of the regional overall economy. As a consumer main body, the consumption characteristics of urban residents have strong window and demonstration. The difference in consumption structure helps to understand the consumption gap in the region, and it is important to realize the coordinated development of regional economy and maintain the overall competitiveness of the region. Therefore, this paper takes urban residents in the eastern provinces and cities as the research object. On the basis of a brief analysis of the differences in the consumption level of urban residents in the eastern provinces and cities, the paper focuses on the analysis of the inter provincial differences in the consumption structure. (1) to study the inter provincial differences in consumption level. First, based on the standard deviation and coefficient of variation in the single index system, the development rules of regional differences in the period of 2001-2014 years are analyzed. Secondly, the factor analysis method in the comprehensive index system is used to explore the differences in the comprehensive consumption level of urban residents in the eastern provinces and cities of the East in 2014. (2) to analyze the inter provincial difference of consumption structure. First, based on the generalized entropy, equilibrium and dominance index, the consumption quality of urban residents in the eastern provinces and cities in 2001-2014 years was measured and the variation trend of the difference of consumption quality was analyzed based on the coefficient of variation; then the ELES model based on cross section data was constructed. The difference between the consumption structure of urban residents in the eastern provinces and cities in 2014 is analyzed. Through the two aspects of the study, the purpose of this study is to excavate the consumption potential of urban residents with lower consumption level and reduce the regional gap. The results show that: (1) the relative difference of consumption level of urban residents in eastern provinces and towns is in the total period of 2001-2014 years. The relative difference values show the regularity of the irregular wave peak and the trough alternately. According to the comprehensive factor score, the urban residents in the eastern provinces and cities are ranked as Beijing, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong, Jiangsu, Fujian, Tianjin, Hainan, Liaoning, Shandong, Hebei. The ranking clearly shows that the consumption level of urban residents in cities and cities is in the East. Relative position in the region. (2) during the 2001-2014 years, the consumption quality differences of urban residents in eastern provinces and cities showed stability characteristics. The variation coefficient was limited to 2.5%-3.5%, the maximum value of variation coefficient was 3.34% in 2005 and 2.56% in 2003. (3) the consumption structure of urban residents in Eastern provinces and cities was changed by income. The influence shows the coexistence of homosexuality and heterogeneity. The convergence is reflected in the lack of elasticity in food, clothing, household equipment and services, medical care and other aspects of urban residents in the eastern provinces and cities, and in the living category, other goods and services are elastic. Hainan, Liaoning, Guangdong and Jiangsu are in traffic communication and communication. There are lack of elasticity and flexibility in other provinces and cities; Hainan, Shandong, Fujian, Guangdong, Zhejiang, etc. are flexible in cultural and educational entertainment, and other provinces and cities are lack of elasticity. (4) the consumption structure of urban residents in eastern provinces and cities is affected by the change of price. The absolute value of self price elasticity of urban residents in eastern and western provinces and cities is more than 1, and the absolute value of self price elasticity in food, clothing, household equipment and services, health care, communication, and entertainment of culture and education is less than 1 and inelastic. Several suggestions are put forward to help the urban residents to share the fruits of reform.

【学位授予单位】：浙江工商大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F126.1

【相似文献】