论空白票据的补充权

发布时间：2018-01-07 06:28

本文关键词：论空白票据的补充权　出处：《宁波大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：空白票据制度产生于商事活动中,交易当事人基于对彼此的信任为了交易方便,同时提高票据的流通效率,采用了空白票据制度。空白票据顺应了市场经济发展,突破了传统票据理论的要式性。票据的效力受票据形式性影响,绝对必要记载事项空白的票据,因未满足形式要件,将被认定为无效票据。然而,实际生活中,出票人和收款人往往有不同的目的和要求,传统的票据形式已经不能满足出票人、收款人或者第三方交易人对交易多样性的要求。空白票据补充权对空白票据来说至关重要,它关乎着空白票据的存在与适用。我国《票据法》对空白票据制度规定过于简单,仅允许空白支票的存在,对空白补充权的规定几乎没有涉及,已无法解决现实生活中的问题。因此,对空白票据及空白补充权等问题进行探讨,已显得非常有必要。本文着重分析要式性与自治性视野下的补充权、空白补充权的立法比较、票据关系人的法律地位等内容,希望能全面认识空白补充权这一问题,为完善我国空白补充权制度贡献一份力量。本文主要分为以下四个部分:文章的第一部分,从票据的要式性与自治性视野下审视补充权,总结补充权涉及的重要理论问题,从该视角理解空白补充权制度。文章的第二部分,比较空白补充权的立法模式。本部分讨论了域外立法对空白补充权采用的立法模式,并对我国立法上空白补充权进行梳理。文章的第三部分,分析票据关系人之间的法律地位。通过对出票人、补充权人和后手持票人主要票据当事人在补充权行使过程中的权利义务关系分析,讨论在不同情形下行使补充权时各票据关系人的法律地位。文章的最后一部分,空白票据补充权的立法建议。希望通过对整篇文章的讨论,最终提出有价值的法律建议。
[Abstract]:The blank bill system comes into being in commercial activities, the parties to the transaction based on mutual trust in order to facilitate the transaction, while improving the efficiency of the circulation of bills. The blank bill system is adopted. The blank bill conforms to the development of market economy and breaks through the requirement of the traditional bill theory. The effectiveness of the bill is influenced by the form of the bill and it is absolutely necessary to record the blank bill. However, in real life, the drawer and the payee often have different purposes and requirements, the traditional form of the bill can no longer meet the drawer. Requirements for diversity of transactions by payees or third-party traders. The right to supplement blank instruments is essential to blank instruments. It is related to the existence and application of blank instruments. The system of blank instruments is too simple to be stipulated in the Bill Law of our country, only the existence of blank checks is allowed, and the provisions on blank supplementary rights are hardly involved. There is no solution to the problems in real life. Therefore, it is very necessary to discuss the blank bill and blank supplementary right. This paper focuses on the analysis of complementary rights from the perspective of essentialism and autonomy. The legislation comparison of blank supplementary right, the legal status of the bill relation person and so on, hope to understand the blank supplementary right in an all-round way. This paper is divided into the following four parts: the first part of the article examines the supplementary right from the perspective of bill style and autonomy. Summary of the important theoretical issues involved in the right to supplement, from this perspective to understand the blank right to supplement the system. The second part of the article. This part discusses the legislative mode adopted by the extraterritorial legislation to the blank supplementary right, and combs the blank supplementary right in our legislation. The third part of the article. This paper analyzes the legal status of the bill parties. Through the analysis of the rights and obligations of the main parties to the bill in the process of exercising the supplementary rights, the author analyzes the rights and obligations of the principal parties to the bill in the exercise of the supplementary rights. The last part of the article, the legislative suggestion of the blank bill supplementary right. Hope to pass the discussion of the whole article. Finally put forward valuable legal advice.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.287

【参考文献】