论电子票据适用票据法的可行性
发布时间:2018-03-03 08:50
本文选题:电子票据 切入点:电子签名 出处:《法学》2017年06期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:为解决电子支票真实性问题,除技术标准须具体和统一外,还需为使用替代支票或缺乏接触纸质支票机会的当事人建立一种损失赔付机制,以及为寄送、提示和返还替代支票的银行设置避免重复提示付款的担保义务。对电子汇票权利正当性的考察,除拓展纸质商业票据登记查询功能及改进和推广相关安全技术外,可引入"控制权"规则以衡量电子汇票的可靠性;同时,可建立全国统一的电子债权登记系统以增强票据权利归属证明的确定性;票据市场交易系统和规则体系应具有一致性、集中性和平等性以促进电子票据对付中票据权利的实现。在认定电子票据签名的效力和保障电子票据签名的可靠性上,应厘清影响电子票据签名可靠性的检测因素,通过桥认证机构模式推进电子身份管理和认证服务的兼容性,借助电子公证和电子数据司法鉴定机制解决认证机构的中立性问题,确定电子票据签名的司法效力。
[Abstract]:In order to address the authenticity of electronic cheques, in addition to technical standards that need to be specific and uniform, there is also a need to establish a loss indemnity mechanism for parties using alternative cheques or lack of access to paper cheques, as well as to send them, The obligation of security to avoid duplicate presentation for payment is set up by presenting and returning substituted cheques. The investigation of the legitimacy of the rights of electronic bills of exchange, in addition to expanding the function of registering and querying paper commercial bills and improving and popularizing the relevant security techniques, The "right of control" rule may be introduced to measure the reliability of electronic bills of exchange; at the same time, a unified national electronic creditor's rights registration system can be established to enhance the certainty of the ownership of instruments, and there should be consistency between the trading system and the rules system in the bill market. Centralization and equality are used to promote the realization of the rights of electronic instruments in dealing with electronic instruments. In determining the validity of electronic instruments' signatures and ensuring the reliability of electronic instruments' signatures, it is necessary to clarify the testing factors that affect the reliability of electronic instruments' signatures. Through the bridge certification organization model to promote the compatibility of electronic identity management and authentication service, to solve the neutral problem of certification organization by means of electronic notarization and electronic data forensic authentication mechanism, and to determine the judicial effect of electronic bill signature.
【作者单位】: 宁波大学法学院;
【基金】:司法部2015年国家法治与法学理论研究项目“电子签名证据的认定路径与证据体系”(15SFB2021)的研究成果之一
【分类号】:D922.287
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高博;孙晓晨;;冲突与协调:电子票据法律问题初探[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2010年02期
2 严浙湘;电子票据的几个法律问题[J];金融会计;2001年08期
3 李爱君;弋t,
本文编号:1560343
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/touziyanjiulunwen/1560343.html