当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 投融资论文 >

马来西亚低成本房屋政策与我国经济适用房政策的比较研究

发布时间:2018-03-15 06:22

  本文选题:经济适用房政策 切入点:低成本房屋政策 出处:《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:在我国住房体制改革初期,全国主要城市建立了以经济适用房为主的住房供应系统,解决了大量城镇低收入居民的住房困难问题。但随着我国经济进入转型期,经济适用房政策陷入困境,出现了补贴对象失控、分配不公、布局郊区化等问题,经济适用房政策面临巨大质疑。这一时期学界的主要研究方向是向美国、英国、德国等老牌资本主义国家学习借鉴,通过对比研究发达国家的住房保障制度,提出完善我国经济适用房政策的对策。而本文所选取的比较对象为马来西亚低成本房屋政策,与以上各国相比,马来西亚在地理位置、国情、族群构成上与我国更具有可比性,其低成本房屋在1997年被联合国住宅大会评为为低收入者提供住房的最佳模式,对我国经济适用房政策的学习借鉴意义更大。 本文主要采用比较研究方法,从补贴对象、补贴方式、房屋来源、资金来源、建设布局、申请流程、分配方式、流转退出和后期管理共九个方面,,对中马住房政策进行比较分析,并从中马两国的对比中发现我国经济适用房政策中的主要问题,最后尝试性地提出一些发展完善的建议。
[Abstract]:In the early stage of housing system reform in China, a housing supply system with comfortable housing as the main component was established in major cities of China, which solved the housing difficulties of a large number of low-income residents in cities and towns. However, as China's economy entered the transition period, Comfortable housing's policy has fallen into a dilemma, resulting in problems such as out of control subsidies, unfair distribution, suburbanization, and so on, which has caused a great deal of questioning. During this period, the main research direction of academic circles was to the United States, Britain, and so on. Germany and other established capitalist countries learn from the study, through the comparative study of housing security systems in developed countries, put forward the improvement of China's comfortable housing policy, and the comparative object of this article is Malaysia's low-cost housing policy. Compared with the above countries, Malaysia is more comparable in terms of its geographical location, national conditions and ethnic composition. In 1997, its low-cost houses were rated by the United Nations Housing Assembly as the best model for housing for low-income people. The study and reference to comfortable housing's policy is of greater significance. This paper mainly adopts the comparative research method, from the subsidy object, the subsidy way, the housing source, the fund source, the construction layout, the application process, the distribution way, the circulation exiting and the later management altogether nine aspects, This paper makes a comparative analysis of the housing policies of China and Malaysia, and finds out the main problems in comfortable housing's policy from the comparison between China and Malaysia. Finally, it tries to put forward some suggestions for the improvement of development.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:F299.23;F299.338

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王革;王迎军;;社会科学定性研究中比较方法的应用[J];财经问题研究;2009年12期

2 张娟;;美国包容性区划对我国保障性住房建设的启示[J];城市规划;2011年09期

3 张祚;李江风;刘艳中;黄琳;;经济适用房空间分布对居住空间分异的影响——以武汉市为例[J];城市问题;2008年07期

4 向为民;斯威尼(Sweeney)住房过滤模型研究[J];四川兵工学报;2004年04期

5 胡际莲;洪诗鸿;;基于博弈视角的经济适用房骗购行为[J];东疆学刊;2011年02期

6 马晓茗,曾向阳;关于经济适用房政策的几点认识[J];湖北社会科学;2003年01期

7 尚小川;;新时期我国政府在廉租房保障中的新角色[J];法制与社会;2008年32期

8 徐元晖;;经济适用房政策的分析[J];法制与社会;2009年06期

9 曾亚萍;吴翔华;聂琦波;;共有产权经济适用房的退出机制研究[J];改革与战略;2010年10期

10 田东海;福利国家与住房政策[J];国外城市规划;2000年01期



本文编号:1614823

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/touziyanjiulunwen/1614823.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6f6d0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com