我国证券集团诉讼的模式选择与制度重构

发布时间：2018-04-12 16:28

本文选题：集团诉讼 + 证券集团诉讼　；参考：《中国法学》2017年02期

【摘要】：我国证券市场虚假陈述、内幕交易、操纵股价等大规模侵权事件频发,但由于行政监管和司法救济乏力,遭受损失的投资者往往投诉无门,很难获得有效的救济。增设对证券市场侵权者威慑力极强的退出制证券集团诉讼制度在我国不仅具有必要性,而且具有可行性。我国目前已经具备了建立退出制证券集团诉讼制度的环境和技术条件。同时,导致美国集团诉讼负面作用较大的因素,有的在我国并不存在,例如错综复杂的双重法院制度;有的在我国比较容易得到控制,例如巨额的律师费用和好讼的法律文化。从现实情况来看,我国增设证券退出制集团诉讼的价值可能会远远大于美国等发达国家,其弊端则可能明显小于上述国家。
[Abstract]:However, because of the weakness of administrative supervision and judicial remedy, the investors who have suffered losses often have no way to complain, so it is difficult to obtain effective remedy because of false statements, insider trading, stock price manipulation and other large-scale infringing incidents in China's securities market.It is not only necessary but also feasible to set up a system of withdrawing securities group litigation which is a strong deterrent to the infringers of securities market in our country.At present, our country already has the environment and the technical condition to establish the withdrawal system securities class action system.At the same time, some of the negative factors that lead to the negative effects of American class action do not exist in our country, such as the complicated double court system, and others are easy to control in our country, such as the huge lawyer fees and the legal culture of good litigation.According to the actual situation, the value of adding securities withdrawal group litigation in our country may be far greater than that in developed countries such as the United States, and its disadvantages may be obviously smaller than those in these countries.
【作者单位】：复旦大学法学院;
【基金】：作者主持的国家社科基金重点项目“我国证券群体诉讼的模式选择与制度构建研究”(项目批准号:11AFX006)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.287

【相似文献】