我国信托财产所有权归属问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-01 12:19

本文选题：信托财产 + 保有权　；参考：《上海大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：转移信托财产所有权或保有权是信托制度的本质特征。人们对两大法系财产观念、衡平等现象存在认识上的错误。在财产观念方面，他们主张建构“双重所有权”。为实现这样学术抱负，有人又提出改造现行所有权或占有制度之主张。在衡平方面，，人们对大陆法系衡平现象要么视而不见，要么持怀疑和排斥态度。导致这些错误认识和主张产生的原因在于，人们在观念上片面地强调权利，而轻视义务；过分崇尚权利、自由，而对权力持怀疑和不信任态度。信托财产所有权归属不仅关乎信托制度的构建，而且关乎立法权与司法权如何配置、权利与义务谁为本位、法律与衡平的相互关系，等等。在我国，构建信托制度不仅要求我们透过两大法系财产观念表象的差异看到它们作为制度之目的的一致性，而且，我们必须对法律中的衡平有所认知，并正确地对待它。唯有如此，才能在处理信托财产归属、构建我国信托制度的过程中远离歧途，走入正道。
[Abstract]:Transfer of ownership or tenure of trust property is the essential characteristic of trust system. There are some mistakes in understanding the property concept and equalization between the two legal systems. In terms of the concept of property, they advocate the construction of "double ownership". In order to realize such academic ambition, some people put forward the idea of reforming the current ownership or possession system. In the aspect of balance, people either ignore the phenomenon of civil law equality, or hold the attitude of scepticism and rejection. The reason for these misunderstandings and claims lies in the fact that people emphasize rights one-sidedly and despise obligations, and excessively advocate rights and freedoms, and hold a skeptical and distrustful attitude towards power. Ownership of trust property is not only related to the construction of trust system, but also to the allocation of legislative power and judicial power, who is the standard of rights and obligations, the relationship between law and balance, and so on. In our country, the construction of trust system not only requires us to see the consistency of the purpose of the two legal systems through the differences in the concept of property, but also, we must have a knowledge of the balance in the law and treat it correctly. Only in this way can we deal with the ownership of trust property and set up our trust system far from the wrong way.
【学位授予单位】：上海大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D912.28

【参考文献】