“类国企化”、产品市场竞争与民企的创新效率

发布时间：2018-03-01 11:52

本文关键词： “类国企化” 政府干预产品市场竞争创新效率　出处：《石河子大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文通过对我国当前现状的分析与现阶段文献的阅读与梳理,将民企在要素资源获取方式、产品市场竞争参与方式方面采取与国企相类似的经营发展路径定义为民企的“类国企化”取向,并通过探讨“类国企化”的创新效率损失,理论论证民企的“类国企化”对微观企业以及产品市场竞争的关系。基于上述考虑,本文主要研究了如下3个问题:(1)民企中的“类国企化”取向是否普遍存在,如果存在,民营企业“类国企化”是通过何种路径形成。(2)民企的这种“理性选择”在我国市场化改革不断深化并日益凸显其法制经济之本质特征的背景下,将会对企业的创新效率产生何种影响?本文试图理清“类国企化”取向作用于企业创新活动的背后机制,从而为政府在未来制定企业政策时提供经验证据。(3)政府干预作为影响民企“类国企化”取向的制度渊源,在政府干预严重时,民企的“类国企化”与企业创新效率的结果是否更显著。文章选取了2007-2015年沪深A股上市公司样本,剔除金融业、ST及PT的上市公司数据、同时发行B股或H股的公司、数据缺失企业,最终得到9216个样本观测值。实证研究了诸多民企的“类国企化”取向会造成民企的创新效率损失,以及其通过产品市场竞争有调节的中介效应从而造成民企更大程度的创新效率损失。进一步研究发现,在政府干预严重的地区,民企的“类国企化”取向通过产品市场竞争造成企业创新效率损失的结果更加显著。上述发现为中国国企改革及其治理提供经验启示的同时,也为中国诸多民企的“类国企化”经营取向及其创新效率损失提供了风险警示意义。
[Abstract]:Through the analysis of the present situation of our country and the reading and combing of the literature at the present stage, this paper attempts to obtain the mode of obtaining the factor resources of the private enterprises. In the aspect of product market competition and participation, we adopt the management and development path similar to that of state-owned enterprises and define them as "quasi-state-owned enterprises", and discuss the loss of innovation efficiency of "quasi-state-owned enterprises". Based on the above considerations, this paper mainly studies the following three questions: (1) whether or not the orientation of "quasi-state-owned enterprises" exists generally in private enterprises, and if so, In the background of the deepening of China's market-oriented reform and the increasing prominence of the essential characteristics of its legal economy, this "rational choice" of private enterprises is formed through what path. What impact will it have on the efficiency of innovation? This paper attempts to clarify the mechanism behind the action of the "quasi-state-owned enterprise" orientation on enterprise innovation activities, thus providing empirical evidence for the government in formulating enterprise policy in the future) government intervention as the institutional origin of influencing the "quasi-state-owned enterprise" orientation of private enterprises. When government intervention is serious, the results of "SOE" and innovation efficiency of private enterprises are more significant. This paper selects a sample of A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2007 to 2015, and excludes the data of St and PT listed companies in the financial sector. Companies that issue B-shares or H-shares at the same time, the companies with missing data, finally get 9216 sample observations. The empirical study shows that the "quasi-state-owned" orientation of many private enterprises will result in the loss of innovation efficiency of private enterprises. And its mediating effect through product market competition, resulting in a greater loss of innovation efficiency of private enterprises. Further studies have found that in areas where government intervention is serious, The result of the loss of innovation efficiency caused by the competition in the product market is more remarkable. The above findings provide experience and enlightenment for the reform and governance of state-owned enterprises in China. It also provides the risk warning significance for the management orientation and the loss of innovation efficiency of many private enterprises in China.
【学位授予单位】：石河子大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F276.5;F273.1;F274

【参考文献】