内部控制质量与公司治理的相关性研究
[Abstract]:Recalling the major cases of financial fraud or company irregularities at home and abroad, regardless of whether it was the Enron incident abroad, Toshiba fraud, the domestic aviation oil incident, the Swertia incident, and so on. These cases are related to the poor quality of the company's internal controls. Therefore, many countries have put forward a variety of methods to improve the quality of internal control. In 2002, the US government passed the Sarbanes Act (SOX Act) to improve the accuracy and reliability of the information disclosed by companies and to protect all stakeholders. In order to promote the construction of internal control and improve the quality of internal control of listed companies, the relevant departments of our country have also published rules and regulations such as "basic norms of internal control of enterprises" and "guidelines for supporting internal control of enterprises", so as to promote the construction of internal control of Chinese companies. Various laws and regulations at home and abroad provide theoretical and legal support for the study of internal control. The market economy of our country starts relatively late and the time of studying internal control is short. Although we have studied and absorbed a large number of advanced internal control theories, there are still some problems such as imperfect internal control system and poor internal control quality of the company. At present, the listed companies in our country still have the following problems in internal control and corporate governance: the corporate governance structure is not perfect, resulting in poor internal control effect, financial fraud, illegal behavior and so on; The self-interest behavior of the company managers will lead them to occupy the resources of the company and seek for their own interests, and because of the asymmetry of information, the owners and other stakeholders of the company do not understand the self-interest behavior of the managers, and can not effectively restrain the behavior of the operators. Previous studies have shown that if there are problems in corporate governance, the quality of internal control is also poor. Therefore, by studying the correlation between internal control quality and corporate governance, we can fundamentally understand the factors that affect the quality of internal control, so as to optimize the internal control system. Improve the quality of the company's internal control. The main meaning of this paper is to study the correlation between internal control quality and corporate governance. Through the empirical method, it provides the basis for improving the internal control quality, helps the company to carry out the internal control construction better, and promotes the management efficiency of the company. To protect the property of the company. This paper takes the data of A-share listed companies in Shanghai Stock Exchange from 2013-2015 as the research object, adopts the method of combining normative research with empirical research, constructs the model on the basis of expounding the theory and summarizing the literature. The correlation between internal control quality and corporate governance is studied by empirical method. The results show that the quality of internal control and corporate governance have a mutual impact on each other. Among them, the degree of ownership concentration, the number of shareholders' meeting, the number of directors' meeting and the number of independent directors' participation have a significant effect on the quality of internal control. This conclusion provides a reference for us to better understand the influencing factors of internal control quality, and also provides a research basis for the company to further optimize the governance structure, improve management efficiency, and ensure the internal control operation of the company.
【学位授予单位】:江苏大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F275;F271
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈建红;;论内部控制、风险管理和公司治理的调配[J];长江大学学报(社科版);2016年09期
2 池国华;杨金;邹威;;高管背景特征对内部控制质量的影响研究——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J];会计研究;2014年11期
3 池国华;韩雨;;整合观视角下内部控制质量度量的新思路——基于文献研究的探讨[J];会计之友;2014年30期
4 丁友刚;王永超;;上市公司内部控制缺陷认定标准研究[J];会计研究;2013年12期
5 方红星;金玉娜;;可感知内部控制质量:度量方法与初步检验[J];财经问题研究;2013年10期
6 李志斌;卢闯;;金融市场化、股权集中度与内部控制有效性——来自中国2009-2011年上市公司的经验证据[J];中央财经大学学报;2013年09期
7 李颖琦;陈春华;俞俊利;;我国上市公司内部控制评价信息披露:问题与改进——来自2011年内部控制评价报告的证据[J];会计研究;2013年08期
8 郄萌;;基于Z值测度的微型企业内部控制与财务风险关系研究[J];统计与决策;2013年11期
9 肖华;张国清;;内部控制质量、盈余持续性与公司价值[J];会计研究;2013年05期
10 苗宇;;所有权、公司治理与内部控制——基于制度经济学理论的思考[J];财会研究;2012年16期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 刘祖基;企业内部控制有效性影响因素研究[D];财政部财政科学研究所;2013年
2 王林辉;公司治理与内部会计控制信息披露相关性研究[D];浙江理工大学;2012年
,本文编号:2196452
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/xmjj/2196452.html