高管事务所关联、制度环境与审计质量
[Abstract]:The research on audit quality has been the focus of theoretical and practical circles at home and abroad. The quality of audit is the basis of the survival and development of audit, which directly affects the function of audit as an external governance mechanism. In recent years, as a result of the Enron incident in the United States, the bankruptcy of Australia's HIH Insurance Company and the Toshiba financial scandal in Japan, regulators in various countries have promulgated bills and issued a series of measures against the "association of executive firms". To emphasize the responsibilities and obligations of auditors. Under the influence of laws issued by various countries, government regulators have also begun to pay attention to the phenomenon of executive relationship, and in 2010 for the first time to the accounting firm's former partners to impose a one-year "cooling-off period". Compared with the immediate decision of regulatory authorities, scholars are still controversial on this topic. Although the majority of scholars think that firm association will lead to compromise of audit independence, but whether the audit quality is damaged has not reached a unanimous conclusion. In addition, the institutional environment, as a macro environment for the effective operation of capital markets, has an important impact on auditors' audit supply behavior. Compared with the western developed countries, the capital market of our country starts relatively late, and the development is not mature enough, but the degree of economic development and the market system environment of different regions have significant differences. In view of this, this article starts with the factor of executive firm association, analyzes its influence on audit quality, and further discusses whether there are differences in the influence of executive firm association on audit quality under different system environment. To explore the role of institutional environment in the operation of China's capital market. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is the introduction. This chapter mainly introduces the research background, research significance, research ideas and research innovation, and reviews the related research and audit quality influencing factors related to senior management firms at home and abroad. The second chapter is related concepts and theoretical basis. This chapter defines the related concepts of the research object, and expounds the theoretical basis of principal-agent theory, information asymmetry theory, efficient market theory, insurance theory and rational choice theory. The third chapter is theoretical analysis and hypothesis. This chapter firstly describes the development of the relationship between the executive firms of listed companies in China, then analyzes the impact mechanism of the association of the executive firms on the audit quality, and finally, the relationship of the executive firms. The relationship between institutional environment and audit quality is discussed theoretically and the research hypotheses of this paper are put forward. Chapter four is an empirical study. This chapter selects all A-share listed companies in the capital market of our country from 2011-2014 as the research sample, designs the variable index and constructs the multivariate regression model, and uses SAS 9.1 software to associate the executive firm. The research hypotheses of institutional environment and audit quality are analyzed empirically. The fifth chapter is the conclusion of the research and policy recommendations. The findings are as follows: (1) there is a significant negative correlation between the relationship between executive firms and audit quality, that is, the listed companies with the association of executive firms can obtain more space of earnings management in the audit, and also get the standard audit opinion more easily; (2) the better the institutional environment, the more can restrain the negative correlation between executive firm association and audit quality. This indicates that the function of external audit governance depends on a good institutional environment, so the construction of a good institutional environment is of great significance to the healthy operation of accounting firms.
【学位授予单位】:安徽大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F275;F832.51;F239.4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱喜林;提高审计质量应处理好的几个关系[J];河北审计;2000年11期
2 罗爱源,穆宪河;严管理 高质量 增效益 馆陶县深入开展“审计质量效益年”活动[J];河北审计;2000年12期
3 霍保银;落实两个规定 强化任期审计质量[J];中国审计;2001年01期
4 刘军,王晓梅;牢牢抓住审计质量这个“牛鼻子”──兼谈影响审计质量的成因及对策[J];审计理论与实践;2001年04期
5 董明秋,孙健;审计质量与审计诉讼判决结果关系的探讨[J];审计理论与实践;2001年05期
6 ;坚持不懈地抓好审计质量[J];河北审计;2001年03期
7 穆宪河;思想风险与审计质量[J];河北审计;2001年09期
8 王晓梅;牢牢抓住审计质量这个“牛鼻子”──兼谈影响审计质量的成因及对策[J];山东审计;2001年04期
9 韩少奇;提高审计质量的途径[J];河北审计;2002年01期
10 黄树平;提升预算执行审计质量和水平的思考[J];中国审计;2002年12期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 陈信元;夏立军;;事务所任期与审计质量:来自中国证券市场的经验证据[A];中国会计学会第六届理事会第二次会议暨2004年学术年会论文集(下)[C];2004年
2 刘国常;田勇;;基于审计质量特征拓展分析的审计质量控制研究[A];中国会计学会2006年学术年会论文集(上册)[C];2006年
3 潘克勤;;客户重要性与审计质量——基于2002年度中国前“20大”事务所的上市公司客户盈余管理的分析[A];中国会计学会2005年学术年会论文集(下)[C];2005年
4 刘金成;;以主题教育实践活动为抓手 全面提升审计质量[A];宜春市“解放思想求突破、科学发展促赶超”理论研讨会论文集[C];2008年
5 李明辉;刘笑霞;;会计师事务所合并对审计质量之影响——来自中国资本市场的经验证据[A];中国会计学会财务成本分会第25届理论研讨会论文集[C];2012年
6 王兵;李晶;唐逸凡;;行政处罚能改进审计质量吗?基于中国证监会处罚的证据[A];中国会计学会高等工科院校分会第十八届学术年会(2011)论文集[C];2011年
7 李江涛;宋华杨;邓迦予;;会计师事务所组织形式与审计意见、审计质量[A];中国会计学会2012年学术年会论文集[C];2012年
8 褚相奇;;浅析财务报表与信息、审计质量三者的关系[A];经济生活——2012商会经济研讨会论文集(下)[C];2012年
9 张栋;戴德明;;行政处罚机制与审计质量——兼评政府监管的有效性[A];第四届(2009)中国管理学年会——会计与财务分会场论文集[C];2009年
10 张政斌;;用课题化模式提升审计质量[A];中国会计学会高等工科院校分会2010年学术年会论文集[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 ;美注协审计质量中心任命首届公众委员会[N];财会信报;2007年
2 何建秋;审计质量管理之我见(一)[N];财会信报;2013年
3 姚峰;平邑健全审计质量保障体系[N];中国审计报;2002年
4 赵保平;提高审计质量刍议[N];中国审计报;2004年
5 金雨薇 庄济温;青岛市狠抓审计质量管理[N];中国审计报;2006年
6 徐杨 窦霁云 王金萍;青白江区努力提高审计质量[N];中国审计报;2007年
7 张玉斌;建章立制 提高审计质量[N];韶关日报;2007年
8 通讯员 翁文基;安徽扎实推进“审计质量年”[N];财会信报;2008年
9 孔小辉清河区审计局干部;文明审计的核心是提高审计质量[N];铁岭日报;2008年
10 张梅荣;以执法水平保审计质量[N];中国乡镇企业报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 常京萍;重大资产重组公司审计师变更行为研究[D];中国矿业大学;2015年
2 吴伟荣;制度背景、签字注册会计师背景特征与审计质量研究[D];华中科技大学;2015年
3 钟伟强;审计质量溢酬的形成机理与客观存在[D];上海交通大学;2007年
4 王芳;政府审计质量的影响因素研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
5 陈晓媛;政府监管与审计质量改进研究[D];西南财经大学;2008年
6 孙坤;独立审计质量保证论[D];东北财经大学;2003年
7 任夏仪;中国上市公司独立审计质量的理论与实证研究[D];重庆大学;2006年
8 刘爱松;会计师事务所规模对审计质量的影响[D];暨南大学;2008年
9 陈晓芳;注册会计师审计质量理论与实证研究[D];武汉理工大学;2005年
10 孙永军;基于规模视角的我国会计师事务所审计质量研究[D];东北财经大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 董学锦;我国房地产上市公司审计质量影响因素研究[D];山东建筑大学;2015年
2 赵文s,
本文编号:2330203
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/xmjj/2330203.html