当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 政治经济论文 >

我国死缓制度研究

发布时间:2018-01-08 09:16

  本文关键词:我国死缓制度研究 出处:《河北大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 死缓 适用条件 立法缺陷 立法建议


【摘要】:死缓是指对于应当判处死刑的犯罪分子,如果不是必须立即执行的,可以在判处死刑的同时宣告缓期二年执行的一种死刑的特殊执行制度。死缓制度是中国的独创,,中国缓刑制度从性质上讲是缓刑的一种。它作为一项重要的刑事法律制度,其合理存在所具有的社会基础主要表现在政治、经济、文化三方面。适用死缓有利于贯彻宽严相济的刑事政策;有利于实现双重刑罚目的;有利于维护法律的公平正义,保障人权。 根据刑法的规定,适用死缓的条件是,应当判处死刑的犯罪分子,不是必须立即执行。对被判处死刑缓期执行的罪犯的减刑,由罪犯服刑地的高级人民法院根据同级监狱管理机关审核同意的减刑建议书裁定。被适用死缓的犯罪分子因其在缓期二年执行期间的表现不同而有不同的结果,或者立即执行死刑,或者减为无期徒刑或有期徒刑。《刑法修正案》(八)规定了死缓限制减刑制度,缓解了我国刑罚体系“死刑偏重、生刑偏轻”的现象。适用死缓限制减刑制度要坚持罪刑法定原则、罪责刑相适应原则、坚持有利于贯彻死刑政策的原则。死缓限制减刑适用范围包括三种情况:对判处死刑缓期执行的累犯的限制减刑;对因七种具体犯罪被判处死刑缓期执行罪犯的限制减刑;对犯有组织的暴力性犯罪被判处死缓的罪犯限制减刑。 尽管《刑法修正案》(八)对死缓制度作了修改,我国的死缓制度仍然存在一些问题。比如,死缓适用条件模糊;死缓变更为死刑立即执行的条件太宽泛;死缓考验期不合理;对无故意犯罪但有一般立功表现的处理不合理。所以,我国刑法应当进一步明确死缓的适用条件,对于死缓变更为死刑立即执行的条件改为死缓期间故意犯罪被判处五年以上有期徒刑的;延长死缓考验期;区分死缓期间有一般立功与既无故意犯罪又无立功情节的处理等。
[Abstract]:Reprieve refers to the criminals should be sentenced to death, if immediate execution is not essential, special enforcement system may declare a death penalty suspended for two years and at the same time sentenced to death. China reprieve is original, China probation system in essence is a kind of slow punishment. It is one of the most important the criminal legal system, its reasonable existence social foundation has manifested in political, economic and cultural three aspects. For the reprieve to implement the criminal policy of combining punishment with leniency; is conducive to the realization of the dual purpose of punishment; to maintain fairness and justice, the legal protection of human rights.
According to the provisions of the criminal law, for reprieve condition is that the criminals should be sentenced to death, not to be executed immediately. Is sentenced to death penalty reprieve commutation by criminals, senior people's court according to agreed to the same level of prison management authority audit commutation proposal ruling. Criminals who are applicable for the reprieve for his performance in during the two years suspended has a different result, or executed immediately, or reduced to life imprisonment or imprisonment. Criminal law amendment (eight) "the provisions of the reprieve commutation limit system, alleviate the death penalty system in our country on the lighter punishment, students" phenomenon. For reprieve limit the commutation system should adhere to the principle of legality, the principle of suiting punishment, insist to implement the principles of the policy. The death penalty reprieve commutation limit scope includes three kinds of situations: the death sentence suspended The limit commutation of recidivist; to limit the commutation by seven specific crimes were sentenced to death suspended criminals; to limit the commutation of organized violence crime criminals were sentenced to death.
Although the "criminal law amendment" (eight) the reprieve system has been modified, the reprieve system there are still some problems. For example, the applicable conditions of reprieve fuzzy; its change for immediate execution of death penalty is too broad; probation period is not reasonable; for no intentional crime but generally meritorious treatment is not reasonable. Therefore, the criminal law of our country should further clarify the applicable conditions of reprieve, for its change to immediate execution of death penalty conditions to reprieve during intentional crime was sentenced to five years imprisonment; extend the probation period; distinguish between death with common meritorious service and neither intentional crime nor meritorious treatment.

【学位授予单位】:河北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.12

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 黄云波;;死缓制度新论——以限制死刑为视角[J];滨州职业学院学报;2009年01期

2 邵伟;;死刑存废的法与经济学分析[J];法制与社会;2007年08期

3 曹永志;;死缓制度问题研究[J];法制与社会;2010年02期

4 孙雅宁;;死刑改革的先声:浅谈我国死缓制度的价值与完善[J];法制与社会;2012年05期

5 李森;;中国死缓制度之探析[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年02期

6 陈兴良;;死刑适用的司法控制——以首批刑事指导案例为视角[J];法学;2013年02期

7 杨勇;死缓本质新探——从死缓规定本身的法理逻辑矛盾谈起[J];中北大学学报(社科版);2005年01期

8 沈丹萱;;死缓制度中的期限问题浅析[J];湖南公安高等专科学校学报;2008年03期

9 黄京平,石磊;论死刑缓期执行变更为死刑立即执行若干问题[J];河南社会科学;2003年04期

10 江献军;周瑞霞;;论死缓制度的理论基础与司法适用[J];河南教育学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年05期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 刘佳;死缓限制减刑制度研究[D];南京师范大学;2013年



本文编号:1396507

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zhengzhijingjixuelunwen/1396507.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f6bbe***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com