资本的空间生产与中国城镇化的内在逻辑——基于新马克思主义空间生产理论的视角

发布时间：2018-03-14 04:09

本文选题：资本积累　切入点：资本循环　出处：《上海经济研究》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：新马克思主义空间生产理论秉承马克思主义经济学的基本原理,以资本积累为切入点,从生产方式变迁的角度对资本主义城市化展开分析,这一理论为中国城镇化问题的研究提供了新的视角和方法。该文运用新马克思主义空间生产理论的相关范畴和分析逻辑对中国城镇化问题的内在本质进行阐述。在中国的制度语境下,剥夺农业的资本积累方式是城镇化发展的内生性因素,在资本的初级循环并未完全完成的情况下,受资本逻辑和利益博弈主导,大量资本进入次级循环,并在政府力量的介入下通过次级循环影响初级循环。在中国的政治经济背景下,资本空间生产逻辑主导的城镇化过程比资本主义国家的城市化更为复杂且更具特点,是政府、资本与空间三重因素交织作用的产物,资本的运作轨迹并不局限于自我不断积累和增值,同时还服务于不同的政治经济目标。在城镇化过程中,政府、企业和个人等利益主体基于不同目的、通过不同的资本配置机制实现各自增值效应的同时形塑着相应的城镇化特征,也导致相应的风险和冲突。
[Abstract]:Based on the basic principles of Marxist economics and capital accumulation, the new Marxist spatial production theory analyzes the urbanization of capitalism from the perspective of the change of production mode. This theory provides a new perspective and method for the study of China's urbanization. This paper expounds the intrinsic nature of China's urbanization problem by using the relevant categories and analytical logic of the new Marxist theory of spatial production. In the context of China's system, Depriving agriculture of capital accumulation is the endogenous factor of urbanization development. Under the condition that the primary cycle of capital is not completely completed, a large amount of capital enters into the secondary cycle, which is dominated by the logic of capital and the game of interests. Under the political and economic background of China, the urbanization process led by the logic of capital space production is more complex and more characteristic than the urbanization of capitalist countries. The operation of capital is not limited to self-accumulation and appreciation, but also serves different political and economic objectives. In the process of urbanization, the government, Enterprises and individuals and other stakeholders based on different purposes through different capital allocation mechanisms to achieve their own value-added effects at the same time shape the corresponding urbanization characteristics also lead to the corresponding risks and conflicts.
【作者单位】：山西财经大学经济学院;中国人民大学经济改革与发展研究院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目(批准号:14ZDA022)资助
【分类号】：F299.21

【相似文献】