恩格斯是反对熵定律,还是批评“热寂说”——生态经济学与生态社会主义的论争及其启示

发布时间：2018-06-17 05:32

本文选题：熵定律 + 恩格斯　；参考：《马克思主义研究》2017年06期

【摘要】：鉴于熵定律在生态经济学中的重要作用,阿里尔等生态经济学家批判了恩格斯对熵定律的否定,进而指责恩格斯思想的反生态性。针对这样的批判,福斯特、伯克特进行了详细的文本考证,论证了恩格斯批评和否定的不是熵定律,而是批评了把适用于孤立系统的熵定律外推到整个宇宙的热寂假说;批评热寂假说并不意味着对熵定律的否定。福斯特、伯克特对恩格斯的辩护,不仅夯实了马克思主义生态学何以可能的学理支撑,还提醒我们在生态环境问题的研究上要认清一些西方生态学家强调生态问题的自然原因而否定意识形态的倾向,需要引起我们反思的是对生态环境问题的去政治化阐释,我们只有将熵定律置于更宽广的政治经济系统中进行考察才更有意义。
[Abstract]:In view of the important role of entropy law in ecological economics, Ariel and other ecological economists criticized Engels' negation of entropy law, and then accused Engels of anti-ecology. In response to this criticism, Forster and Berkshire have made detailed textual research, demonstrating that Engels' criticism and negation is not the entropy law, but the heat silence hypothesis that extrapolates the entropy law applicable to the isolated system to the whole universe. Criticizing the heat-silence hypothesis does not mean negating the entropy law. Foster, Berkshire's defense of Engels, not only rammed up the theoretical support of Marxist ecology, It also reminds us to recognize the tendency of some western ecologists to emphasize the natural causes of ecological problems and negate ideology in the study of ecological environmental problems. What we need to reflect on is the depoliticized interpretation of ecological environmental problems. It makes more sense if we look at the law of entropy in the wider political and economic system.
【作者单位】：福建师范大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“新自由主义对全球生态环境治理的影响及我国对策研究”(17CKS030)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：F091.91

【相似文献】