宏观调控与产业政策对我国钢铁产业影响的效应分析
发布时间:2018-02-08 15:46
本文关键词: 钢铁产业 宏观调控 货币政策 财政政策 产业政策 出处:《浙江工商大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:自建国以来,我国的钢铁产业经历了从无到有、由小及大的发展过程。特别是最近十年,受益于我国总体良好的经济环境以及中央的各项政策,在建筑业、铁路运输业以及金属制造业等相关行业的快速发展的带动下,整个经济对钢材产能的需求也越来越大,这进一步刺激了钢铁产业的扩张。截至2014年中国不但是世界上最大的钢铁生产者,同时也是最大的钢铁消费者。随着我国钢铁产业的不断发展,我国钢铁产品在国际市场上的占有率也不断提高,国际竞争力日益增强。但是诸如产业的布局、结构、技术、质量等问题依然存在,需要进一步得到解决,由钢铁大国成为钢铁强国的道路仍然漫长。 由于钢铁产业的重要地位使政府很早就注意到它存在的问题,为了促进钢铁产业的健康发展也实施了诸多的调控手段,但从调控的实际结果来看,似乎并没有取得预期的效果。以产能过剩为例,尽管政府一直将产能过剩作为解决钢铁产业问题的核心并实施了多项方案措施,但是直至如今,产能过剩问题依旧困扰着整个钢铁产业。 本文主要研究的是我国宏观调控与产业政策对我国钢铁产业影响的效应。通过对宏观调控与产业政策的影响效应进行理论分析和实证研究,试图揭示出影响宏观调控与产业政策效应的因素。本文首先对宏观调控的货币政策、财政政策以及产业政策对钢铁产业的影响进行理论分析,然后对我国钢铁产业的现状以及我国调控钢铁产业的历史进行回顾并提出现阶段存在的问题。接着对其他国家地区的钢铁产业政策及调控历史进行分析阐述,并建立计量经济学模型对我国宏观调控中的货币政策、财政政策以及政府产业政策对钢铁产业所造成的影响进行实证研究分析。最后结合计量经济模型得出的结论对我国钢铁产业的发展提出政策建议。 根据分析,我国宏观调控与产业政策总体而言在能够在一定程度上影响钢铁产业的发展。但是政府应当改进政策的制定与执行环节,强调货币政策、财政政策以及产业政策的互相结合,合理调控产业内的竞争关系,鼓励钢铁产业的技术进步。从而增强我国钢铁产业的国际竞争力,促进其健康和谐的发展。
[Abstract]:Since the founding of the people's Republic of China, the iron and steel industry in our country has experienced a process of development from scratch, from small to large. Especially in the last ten years, it has benefited from the overall sound economic environment and various policies of the central government in the construction industry. With the rapid development of railway transportation and metal manufacturing and other related industries, the overall economic demand for steel production capacity is also increasing. This has further stimulated the expansion of the steel industry. As of 2014, China was not only the world's largest producer of steel, but also the largest steel consumer. The share of Chinese iron and steel products in the international market is also increasing, and the international competitiveness is increasing. However, problems such as industrial layout, structure, technology and quality still exist and need to be further solved. There is still a long way to go from a large steel country to a steel power. Because of the important position of the iron and steel industry, the government has noticed its problems very early. In order to promote the healthy development of the steel industry, it has also implemented many means of regulation and control, but from the actual results of the regulation and control, It does not seem to have had the desired effect. Take overcapacity, which the government has long put at the heart of the problems of the steel industry and has implemented a number of measures, so far, The problem of overcapacity continues to plague the entire steel industry. This paper mainly studies the effect of macro-control and industrial policy on China's iron and steel industry, through the theoretical analysis and empirical research on the effect of macro-control and industrial policy. This paper tries to reveal the factors that influence the effect of macro-control and industrial policy. Firstly, this paper makes a theoretical analysis of the effects of macro-control monetary policy, fiscal policy and industrial policy on iron and steel industry. Then the present situation of China's iron and steel industry and the history of China's regulation and control of iron and steel industry are reviewed and the problems existing at the present stage are put forward. Then, the policy of iron and steel industry and the history of regulation and control in other countries and regions are analyzed and expounded. And set up the econometrics model to the monetary policy in the macro-control of our country, The impact of fiscal policy and government industrial policy on iron and steel industry is studied and analyzed empirically. Finally, combined with the conclusion of econometric model, some policy suggestions are put forward for the development of iron and steel industry in China. According to the analysis, China's macro-control and industrial policies can affect the development of the steel industry to a certain extent. However, the government should improve the formulation and implementation of the policy and emphasize monetary policy. The combination of fiscal policy and industrial policy can rationally regulate the competitive relationship within the industry and encourage the technological progress of the iron and steel industry so as to enhance the international competitiveness of our country's iron and steel industry and promote its healthy and harmonious development.
【学位授予单位】:浙江工商大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:F426.31;F121.3;F123.16
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张少华;黄寿峰;;我国财政冲击的动态效应和传导机制研究[J];财贸经济;2010年05期
2 张旭,伍海华;论产业结构调整中的金融因素——机制、模式与政策选择[J];当代财经;2002年01期
3 郭丽;;后发优势理论演进及其启示[J];当代经济研究;2009年04期
4 李拥军;高学东;;对日本战后四十年钢铁产业政策的分析[J];中国钢铁业;2008年10期
5 江小涓;我国产业结构及其政策选择[J];中国工业经济;1999年06期
6 徐康宁;韩剑;;中国钢铁产业的集中度、布局与结构优化研究——兼评2005年钢铁产业发展政策[J];中国工业经济;2006年02期
7 梅良勇;张四海;;我国钢铁产业发展政策效应的实证研究[J];工业技术经济;2007年12期
8 聂元贞,章文光;美国钢铁贸易保护争端及其对世界经济贸易的影响[J];国际经贸探索;2003年01期
9 张纯;潘亮;;转型经济中产业政策的有效性研究——基于我国各级政府利益博弈视角[J];财经研究;2012年12期
10 肖强;张晓峒;司颖华;;货币政策有效性及产业非对称性分析[J];商业研究;2014年04期
,本文编号:1495794
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zhongguojingjilunwen/1495794.html