基于协调度模型的收入差距合理区间控制研究

发布时间：2018-11-02 12:20

【摘要】：改革开放30多年来,我国的社会经济发展取得了巨大成就,人民生活水平也得到了显著提升。但与此同时,我国居民收入差距也在不断拉大,引发了社会大众的广泛关注。在经济发展过程中所产生一定的收入差距,是一种比较普遍的现象,但如果任凭这种扩大化趋势不断发展,达到贫富悬殊的地步,将严重阻碍社会经济的协调发展,进而影响到我国社会主义现代化进程的稳步推进。本文将探讨我国收入差距适度性作为全文研究重点。综合考虑经济增长、资源配置效率以及社会公平稳定三方面内容,对我国历年收入差距适度性做出评价。其具体研究方法为：首先,在度量我国收入差距大小的过程中,兼顾基尼系数、泰尔指数以及变异系数三者刻度收入差距大小的各自优势,以该三者为子指标构建收入差距度量指标体系,从而对我国历年收入差距大小做出准确度量；其次,从经济增长、资源配置效率以及社会公平稳定三个大的方面构建了一个四层共涵盖34个子指标的收入差距适度性评价指标体系——社会经济协调发展指标体系；再次,通过构建收入差距指数与社会经济协调发展指数(经济增长评价指数、资源配置效率评价指数以及社会公平稳定评价指数)间协调度模型,测算出1993—2011年我国收入差距各类静(动)态适度性评价指数,并依据测算结果得到：当前我国收入差距大小与社会经济发展各方面内容尚且处于比较协调的状态。最后,依据国际上关于协调度的分类标准,以0.95(“适度”范围的下限值)作为下限阈值,对我国收入差距适度性评价指数测算结果进行筛选,将处于适度范围内相应年份的基尼系数值作为样本对象,然后基于相关统计方法,测算出最终基尼系数的合理区间为[0.35,0.40]。综合以上实证分析,得到了目前我国收入差距与社会经济各方面内容尚且处于比较协调和相对适应的状态。但进如21世纪后,我国基尼系数取值绝大多数均落在合理区间[0.35,0.40]右侧,即表明现今我国居民收入差距已经偏大,如不加以控制任其发展,必然会造成与社会经济发展不协调与不适应。所以在本文的最后,针对我国实际,富有创新意识地提出了“一主两翼”的组合政策建议,来控制缩小收入差距,使之重新回到合理范围之内。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China's social and economic development has made great achievements, and the people's living standards have been significantly improved. But at the same time, the income gap of residents in our country is also widening, which has aroused the widespread concern of the public. A certain income gap in the course of economic development is a relatively common phenomenon. However, if this trend of expansion is allowed to continue to develop and reach the point of disparity between the rich and the poor, it will seriously hinder the coordinated development of the social economy. Then affect our country socialism modernization progress steady advance. This paper will explore the moderation of income gap as the focus of the full text. Considering the three aspects of economic growth, resource allocation efficiency and social equity and stability, this paper evaluates the moderation of income gap over the years in China. The specific research methods are as follows: first of all, in the process of measuring the income gap in China, the Gini coefficient, the Thiel index and the coefficient of variation are taken into account to measure the respective advantages of the income gap. Take the three as sub-indicators to build the income gap measurement index system, so as to make an accurate measurement of the income gap over the years in China; Secondly, from three aspects of economic growth, resource allocation efficiency and social equity and stability, this paper constructs an index system for evaluating the moderation of income gap, which covers 34 sub-indicators, namely, social and economic coordinated development index system. Thirdly, by constructing the coordination degree model between the income gap index and the socio-economic coordinated development index (economic growth evaluation index, resource allocation efficiency evaluation index and social equity and stability evaluation index). From 1993 to 2011, the author calculates the evaluation index of various kinds of static (dynamic) state moderation of China's income gap, and according to the results of the calculation, it concludes that the current income gap and various aspects of social and economic development in our country are still in a relatively coordinated state. Finally, according to the international classification standards on the degree of coordination, taking 0.95 (the lower limit of the "moderate" range) as the threshold, the results of the evaluation index of the moderation of income gap in China are screened. Taking the Gini coefficient value of the corresponding year in a moderate range as the sample object, the reasonable range of the final Gini coefficient is calculated based on the relevant statistical method [0.35% 0.40]. Based on the above empirical analysis, it is concluded that the income gap and various aspects of social economy in China are in a relatively coordinated and relatively adaptable state at present. However, after entering the 21st century, most of the Gini coefficients of our country fall to the right side of the reasonable range [0.35 / 0.40], which indicates that the income gap of the residents in our country is already on the large side, if we do not control it and let it develop, It will inevitably lead to disharmony and incompatibility with social and economic development. So at the end of this paper, aiming at the reality of our country, the author puts forward the combination policy of "one main and two wings" to control and narrow the income gap and bring it back to a reasonable range.
【学位授予单位】：武汉理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：F124.7;F224

【参考文献】