经济发展、制度安排与地方反腐败力度——基于G省面板数据的分析
发布时间：2019-01-17 18:25
【摘要】：地方反腐败力度是影响腐败治理成败的关键因素之一。对G省21个地级市腐败案件立案数与处分数的纵贯分析发现,过去十年中各地方反腐败力度存在着显著差异。采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型分析发现,经济发展水平、地方分权程度和政治周期显著地影响着地方反腐败力度。其中,经济发展与反腐败力度之间呈倒U型关系,在人均GDP为2.4万元左右的时候,反腐败力度最大。地方分权程度越高,反腐败力度越小。与其他年份相比,政府换届年份的反腐败力度会显著降低。
[Abstract]:The strength of local anti-corruption is one of the key factors influencing the success or failure of corruption management. Through the longitudinal analysis of the number of corruption cases and the scores of the departments in 21 prefecture-level cities in the G province, it is found that there are significant differences in the anti-corruption efforts in the past ten years. By using the fixed effect model and stochastic effect model, it is found that the level of economic development, the degree of decentralization and the political cycle significantly affect the local anti-corruption efforts. Among them, the relationship between economic development and anti-corruption is inverted U-shaped. When the per capita GDP is about 24000 yuan, anti-corruption is the most powerful. The greater the degree of decentralization, the smaller the fight against corruption. Compared with other years, the change of government years will be significantly less anti-corruption efforts.
【作者单位】： 中山大学廉政与治理研究中心、政治与公共事务管理学院;中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“全面加强惩治和预防腐败体系建设:战略;路径与对策研究”(项目编号:13&ZD011) 打造“理论粤军”2014年度重点课题“增创广东反腐败体制机制新优势研究”(项目编号:WT1423)
【分类号】：F124;D630.9
[Abstract]:The strength of local anti-corruption is one of the key factors influencing the success or failure of corruption management. Through the longitudinal analysis of the number of corruption cases and the scores of the departments in 21 prefecture-level cities in the G province, it is found that there are significant differences in the anti-corruption efforts in the past ten years. By using the fixed effect model and stochastic effect model, it is found that the level of economic development, the degree of decentralization and the political cycle significantly affect the local anti-corruption efforts. Among them, the relationship between economic development and anti-corruption is inverted U-shaped. When the per capita GDP is about 24000 yuan, anti-corruption is the most powerful. The greater the degree of decentralization, the smaller the fight against corruption. Compared with other years, the change of government years will be significantly less anti-corruption efforts.
【作者单位】： 中山大学廉政与治理研究中心、政治与公共事务管理学院;中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目“全面加强惩治和预防腐败体系建设:战略;路径与对策研究”(项目编号:13&ZD011) 打造“理论粤军”2014年度重点课题“增创广东反腐败体制机制新优势研究”(项目编号:WT1423)
【分类号】：F124;D630.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 汪勤梅;中非和博茨瓦纳发展历程比较[J];西亚非洲;2001年05期
2 郑万城;促进私营个体经济发展的建议[J];中国行政管理;2001年07期
3 沈海洪,金惠英,郑万城;个私经济发展与金融服务创新探析[J];中国行政管理;2001年12期
4 李文;;浅谈民营经济发展的政策导向[J];沈阳干部学刊;2003年06期
5 夏圣文,任万明;对进一步加快民营经济发展的思考[J];理论学刊;2003年05期
6 胡梅娟,嵇哲;民营经济发展滞后地区应开放垄断行业[J];w挛胖芸，
本文编号：2410250
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zhongguojingjilunwen/2410250.html
