有轨电车换乘设施协调性评价研究

发布时间：2018-06-27 21:27

本文选题：有轨电车站点换乘协调性 + AHP-DEA组合模型　；参考：《东南大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：城市化进程的加快,汽车保有量的增加,加剧了交通拥挤,交通污染,能源危机等"城市病"现象。解决这些交通相关问题的根本途径是大力发展公共交通。具有大运量、低能耗和无污染等优点的轨道交通方式日益受到关注,有轨电车作为轨道交通方式的一种形式,同样具有其自身的优点,相较于地铁、轻轨,其投资低,建设周期短,审批简单,同时有轨电车比常规公交运量大、速度快、少污染。地铁、轻轨适合作为大城市的骨干线路,常规公交适合作为小城市的干线,或者地铁等大运量交通的支线,而有轨电车特别适合作为郊区新城和中型城市的骨干线路,承担这些地区的交通需求。为了使有轨电车充分发挥其运量优势,扩大其服务范围,有必要研究有轨电车站点的换乘情况,包括对站点的换乘设施协调性进行评价研究。本文的研究目标是通过构建合理的评价指标体系,评价有轨电车一体化换乘设施协调性,分析评价结果,从而为相关的有轨电车换乘项目提供理论方面的依据。由于本文是从评价对象中选取最优集,因此评价的结果是相对优劣,评价结果越接近1,评价对象的换乘效率相对越好,即评价对象与最优集越接近,反之评价对象的换乘效率则越差。首先,通过搜集现状客流数据,分析有轨电车及其换乘设施的特点,然后结合现场调查、问卷调查等,选择合理的换乘评价指标,使用 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process,层次分析法)和 DEA(Data Envelopment Analysis,数据包络分析)综合确定评价指标的权重,最后利用灰色关联度分析法评价有轨电车换乘设施协调性。通过分析比较评价结果与现实情况,同时对比AHP法、DEA法和改进的灰色关联度分析法的评价结果,得出本文采用的方法综合考虑了决策者主观偏好和客观性两方面,同时在分析评价对象优劣方面具有更好的可区分性。在现实中,对评价站点换乘设施协调性方面具有指导意义。
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of urbanization and the increase of vehicle ownership, traffic congestion, traffic pollution, energy crisis and other "urban diseases" have been aggravated. The fundamental way to solve these problems is to develop public transport. Rail transit, which has the advantages of large capacity, low energy consumption and no pollution, has attracted more and more attention. As a form of rail transportation, trams also have their own advantages, compared with subway and light rail, their investment is low. The construction period is short, the examination and approval is simple, and the tram is larger than the conventional bus, faster and less pollution. The subway and light rail are suitable for the backbone of large cities, the conventional public transport is suitable for the trunk lines of small cities, or the spur lines for large volume of traffic such as subways, while trams are especially suitable for the backbone of suburban new and medium-sized cities. To meet the transportation needs of these areas. In order to give full play to the advantages of tram traffic and expand its service range, it is necessary to study the transfer situation of tram stations, including the evaluation and study of the coordination of transfer facilities. The purpose of this paper is to establish a reasonable evaluation index system, evaluate the coordination of tram transfer facilities, and analyze the evaluation results, so as to provide theoretical basis for the relevant tram transfer projects. In this paper, the optimal set is selected from the evaluation object, so the evaluation result is relatively good and bad. The closer the evaluation result is, the better the transfer efficiency of the evaluation object is, that is, the closer the evaluation object is to the optimal set, the better the transfer efficiency of the evaluation object is. On the contrary, the transfer efficiency of the evaluation object is worse. First of all, through collecting the current passenger flow data, analyzing the characteristics of trams and their transfer facilities, then combining with on-site investigation, questionnaire survey, and so on, select reasonable transfer evaluation index. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) are used to determine the weights of evaluation indexes. Finally, the coordination of tram transfer facilities is evaluated by grey correlation analysis. By analyzing and comparing the evaluation results with the actual situation, and comparing the evaluation results of the AHP method and the improved grey correlation analysis method, it is concluded that the method adopted in this paper comprehensively considers the subjective preference and objectivity of the decision makers. At the same time, it has better differentiability in analyzing the evaluation object. In reality, the evaluation of station transfer facilities coordination has a guiding significance.
【学位授予单位】：东南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：U492.433

【参考文献】