当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 路桥论文 >

破碎富水围岩段隧道渗流影响的研究

发布时间:2018-06-28 03:36

  本文选题:破碎富水围岩 + 流固耦合 ; 参考:《兰州交通大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着公路网和铁路网的不断发展,在修建过程中所遇到需要修建隧道通过的路段也不断增加,而其中破碎富水围岩段隧道也变得越来越常见。所以研究在破碎富水围岩段隧道的施工具有重大的实际意义。本文首先对富水隧道渗流的研究意义与研究现状做了总结;之后对扑鸭脚隧道附近的工程地质与水文地质情况做出了概述;然后又对在扑鸭脚隧道YK217+660断面的监测方法进行了介绍,并对监测的结果进行了分析;之后结合现场实际建立了基于FLAC3D的数值计算模型,模拟了隧道的开挖过程,并对渗流耦合和非渗流耦合工况下的隧道施工时的位移与应力进行了比较;最后对半断面注浆和全断面注浆对渗流耦合隧道位移和应力的影响进行了比较,对这两种工况进行了优选。本文的主要结论有:(1)通过应用FLAC3D软件,对渗流耦合计算步增加对隧道位移影响的分析,结合工程实际的施工状况得出了在当前模型条件下,7500个耦合步数是合理的结论。(2)渗流对监测断面附近的位移影响不大,但对开挖掌子面附近的竖向最大位移影响比较大,影响比率在20%左右,而且渗流使得最大位移的范围有所增大,削弱了隧道周围围岩的稳定性。力学分析的结果说明,渗流对隧道监测断面和开挖掌子面附近的竖向最大应力的影响比较大,在30%左右,而对其水平方向的应力的影响则极小,在开挖掌子面附近仅为1.5%左右。(3)半断面注浆对隧道掌子面径向位移几乎没有控制力,对竖向位移的控制力也不强,在10%左右;全断面注浆则对隧道的竖向位移和径向位移有着明显的限制作用,对径向位移有30%左右的影响率,对竖向位移则有25%左右。(4)在对隧道所受应力影响方面,半注浆对隧道竖向应力的影响率为20%要大于全注浆的10%,但全注浆对隧道受到的水平力的影响率为30%要大于半注浆的20%。因为从应力大小而言,水平力为大应力,所以综合而言,从减小应力的角度来讲,全注浆对隧道的保护效果也要好于半注浆。(5)通过综合分析,在渗流特别丰富,隧道位移较大,衬砌极易压坏的情况下建议使用全断面注浆法,而在隧道位移不大,衬砌也不易压坏但是有少量的渗流影响隧道施工与开挖进度的情况下,从经济的角度考虑,半断面注浆就能满足要求。
[Abstract]:Along with the continuous development of highway network and railway network, the sections that need to be built through the tunnel are also increasing in the process of construction, and the tunnels in the fractured water rich surrounding rock are becoming more and more common. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to study the construction of tunnel in the broken water rich surrounding rock section. The significance and current research status are summarized, and then the engineering geology and hydrogeological conditions are summarized, and then the monitoring method of the YK217+660 section is introduced, and the results of the monitoring are analyzed. Then a numerical calculation model based on FLAC3D is set up in combination with the actual field. The excavation process of tunnel is simulated, and the displacement and stress of tunnel under coupled and non seepage flow coupling are compared. Finally, the effect of the half section grouting and full section grouting on the displacement and stress of the coupled tunnel is compared, and the two conditions are optimized. The main conclusions of this paper are: (1) pass. FLAC3D software is used to analyze the influence of the seepage coupling calculation step on the tunnel displacement. According to the actual construction conditions of the engineering, the 7500 coupling steps are reasonable conclusions. (2) the influence of the seepage on the displacement near the monitoring section is not significant, but the vertical maximum displacement near the excavation face is compared. The ratio is about 20%, and the percolation makes the maximum displacement increase, which weakens the stability of the surrounding rock around the tunnel. The results of mechanical analysis show that the influence of seepage on the tunnel monitoring section and the vertical maximum stress near the excavation face is relatively large, at about 30%, and the stress on the horizontal direction is extremely affected. Only about 1.5% near the excavation face. (3) the semi section grouting has little control on the radial displacement of the tunnel face, and the control force of the vertical displacement is not strong, at about 10%. The full section grouting has an obvious limiting effect on the vertical displacement and radial displacement of the tunnel, and the radial displacement has an influence rate of about 30%, and the vertical direction is vertical to the vertical displacement. The displacement is about 25%. (4) in the stress effect on the tunnel, the influence rate of the semi grouting on the vertical stress of the tunnel is 20% greater than that of the full grouting, but the effect rate of the full grouting on the horizontal force of the tunnel is 30% greater than the half grouting 20%. because the horizontal force is large stress in terms of the stress size, so in comprehensive terms, it should be reduced. In terms of force, full grouting has better protective effect on tunnel than half grouting. (5) through comprehensive analysis, full section grouting method is suggested in the case of percolation is especially rich, tunnel displacement is large and the lining is easily crushed, while the tunnel displacement is not large and the lining is not easily crushed, but a small amount of seepage affects tunnel construction and excavation. From the economic point of view, half section grouting can meet the requirements.
【学位授予单位】:兰州交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:U452.11

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 梅毕祥;杨敏;贾尚华;;基于摩尔库伦准则考虑渗流影响的孔扩张理论[J];同济大学学报(自然科学版);2017年03期

2 杨旭;;某隧道衬砌参数与注浆加固的数值模拟分析[J];北方交通;2016年07期

3 冯丽;;高速公路千枚岩隧道变形动态及其控制技术分析[J];铁道工程企业管理;2015年05期

4 吴祖松;梁波;王元清;徐林生;刘新荣;王羽;;水下圆形隧道注浆加固区渗流特征理论研究[J];岩土力学;2015年S2期

5 徐自享;沈习文;郭宏丽;王新;;千枚岩隧道大变形特征及处治措施[J];水电站设计;2013年03期

6 高海军;;断层破碎带隧道围岩稳定性分析[J];兰州工业学院学报;2013年04期

7 周艺;何川;邹育麟;汪波;;破碎千枚岩隧道富水区段施工及支护方法[J];公路交通科技;2013年05期

8 张松;;关山隧道富水断层破碎围岩施工技术研究[J];中国新技术新产品;2012年21期

9 段宝福;朱应磊;吴圣智;;隧道穿越富水破碎带施工工艺与数值分析[J];施工技术;2012年17期

10 栗晋华;;岩溶隧道注浆加固技术探讨[J];中国科技信息;2012年17期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 李燕;杨林德;闫小波;李鹏;;软弱岩体渗流耦合模型及其数值模拟[A];第九届全国岩石力学与工程学术大会论文集[C];2006年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 刘陆拓;祁连山隧道软弱破碎围岩段施工变形控制[D];北京交通大学;2013年

2 王文忠;富水软岩隧道施工与地下水环境相互影响规律研究[D];石家庄铁道大学;2013年

3 薛陶;渗流场与应力场耦合对隧道围岩和衬砌的影响分析[D];华南理工大学;2010年

4 罗帅;渗流对深部软岩蠕变影响的研究[D];青岛科技大学;2009年

5 张明德;岩溶隧道围岩渗流场分布和衬砌水压力特征研究[D];北京交通大学;2008年



本文编号:2076558

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/daoluqiaoliang/2076558.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户415b7***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com