当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 路桥论文 >

闽东北廊桥景观分析与评价研究

发布时间:2018-07-21 13:44
【摘要】:闽东北廊桥是闽东北地区地标性建筑之一,承载着丰富的历史、文化和艺术价值。随着城镇化进程的加快以及科学技术的发展,该地区的许多廊桥由于缺乏保护正在遭受破坏,甚至消失,因此廊桥的保护迫在眉睫。当前关于廊桥的研究主要集中在廊桥美学、廊桥与人居环境的关系、廊桥的建筑文化、廊桥民间信仰等方面。鲜有从廊桥景观的角度进行分析研究,本研究在大量田野调查的基础上,从廊桥景观的角度,采用层次分析法,结合调查问卷对闽东北廊桥进行分析研究,旨在为闽东北地区乃至全国各地的廊桥保护工作提供理论参考。主要结果如下:(1)通过田野调查以及文献资料的归纳整理,从自然和人文两个方面阐述了闽东北廊桥的成因,分析提取闽东北廊桥景观的构成要素,包括地形地貌景观、水体景观、植物景观和气候天象景观4个自然景观要素;廊屋、桥架、桥台等16个人文景观要素。(2)从自然景观和人文景观2个方面选取地形地貌景观、水体景观、植物景观等10个指标构成要素层,选取地形高差变化、破碎情况、水体形态等35个指标构成指标层,建立系统的闽东北廊桥景观评价体系。综合评价层中,人文景观(0.7880)指标所占的权重值明显大于自然景观(0.2120)。在项目评价层中,廊桥本体要素所占的权重最大,为0.3173。在因子评价层中,廊屋因子所占的权重值最大,为 0.1233。(3)在构建闽东北廊桥景观评价体系的基础上,对实地调查的闽东北60座廊桥进行综合评价,根据评价结果将60座廊桥分为3个等级;第一级评价得分在3.5分以上。综合景观效果非常好,分别是万安桥、鸾峰桥、百祥桥、杨梅州桥、千乘桥等10座廊桥;第二级评价得分在3.0-3.5分。综合景观效果好,分别是红军桥、升仙桥、小东上桥、广利桥、广福桥等18座廊桥;第三级评价得分在3分以下。综合景观效果一般,分别是飞马桥、古厦花桥、双全桥、新康水尾廊桥、尤溪桥等32座廊桥。最终根据评价分析结果以及廊桥现状问题提出闽东北廊桥保护和发展的优化策略。
[Abstract]:Northeastern Fujian Langqiao is one of the landmarks in Northeast Fujian, carrying rich historical, cultural and artistic values. With the acceleration of urbanization and the development of science and technology, many covered bridges in this area are being destroyed or even disappeared due to lack of protection, so the protection of covered bridges is imminent. At present, the research on the bridge is mainly focused on the aesthetics of the bridge, the relationship between the bridge and the living environment, the architectural culture of the bridge, the folk belief of the bridge, and so on. Few studies are carried out from the perspective of the bridge landscape. Based on a large number of field investigations, this study uses the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the questionnaire to analyze the bridge in the northeast of Fujian Province, from the perspective of the landscape of the bridge, and from the perspective of the landscape of the bridge, the paper analyzes and studies the bridge in northeast Fujian Province. The purpose of this paper is to provide a theoretical reference for the protection of bridges in northeast Fujian and all parts of the country. The main results are as follows: (1) through field investigation and literature review, this paper expounds the causes of formation of the bridge in northeast Fujian from the aspects of nature and humanity, and analyzes and extracts the elements of landscape of the bridge in northeast Fujian, including the landscape of topography and geomorphology. Water landscape, plant landscape and climatic sky landscape are 4 natural landscape elements, corridor house, bridge frame, bridge abutment and other 16 human landscape elements. (2) from the natural landscape and human landscape two aspects of topographical landscape, water landscape, Ten indexes, such as plant landscape, were selected to form the key layer, and 35 indexes, such as topographic height difference, fragmentation and water form, were selected to establish a systematic landscape evaluation system of Langqiao in Northeast Fujian. In the comprehensive evaluation layer, the weight value of humanistic landscape (0.7880) is obviously higher than that of natural landscape (0.2120). In the evaluation layer of the project, the weight of the main elements of the bridge is the largest, which is 0.3173. In the factor evaluation layer, the factor of corridor house occupies the largest weight value, which is 0.1233. (3) on the basis of constructing the landscape evaluation system of Langqiao bridge in northeast Fujian, the comprehensive evaluation of 60 covered bridges in northeast Fujian Province is carried out. According to the evaluation results, 60 bridges were divided into three grades, and the first grade was above 3.5. The comprehensive landscape effect is very good, they are Wanan Bridge, Luanfeng Bridge, Baixiang Bridge, Yangmeizhou Bridge, Thousand Ride Bridge, etc. The second stage evaluation score is 3.0-3.5 points. The comprehensive landscape effect is good, they are Red Army Bridge, Shengxian Bridge, Xiaodong Shangqiao, Guangli Bridge, Guangfu Bridge and so on. Comprehensive landscape effect is general, respectively is the Pegasus Bridge, Guxia Flower Bridge, Shuangquan Bridge, Xinkang Watertail Corridor Bridge, Youxi Bridge and other 32 covered bridges. Finally, according to the evaluation and analysis results and the current situation of the bridge, the optimization strategy for the protection and development of the bridge in northeast Fujian is put forward.
【学位授予单位】:福建农林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:U448.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 章玲玲;翟佳伟;;徽派廊桥建筑研究[J];建材与装饰;2016年19期

2 陈旭辉;;闽北廊桥的功能与特色[J];福建文博;2016年01期

3 吴燕霞;;村落公共空间与乡村文化建设——以福建省屏南县廊桥为例[J];中共福建省委党校学报;2016年01期

4 孙琦琦;;试析闽浙木拱廊桥的文化价值和保护利用[J];浙江水利水电学院学报;2015年02期

5 朱永春;;徽州水口园林中的廊桥[J];中国园林;2015年05期

6 赵兵;;基于杉木特性的闽浙木拱廊桥保护措施[J];山西大同大学学报(自然科学版);2015年02期

7 陈利华;;试论闽北廊桥的传承困境与廊桥礼俗的生命走向[J];武夷学院学报;2014年03期

8 周彩英;;基于田野考察的浙南古廊桥保护与思考[J];浙江档案;2014年05期

9 郑玮锋;;廊桥所见中国古典园林建筑意匠[J];绿色科技;2014年02期

10 黄续;;论中国木拱廊桥建筑的营造技艺及其保护策略[J];艺术百家;2013年S2期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 薛东;黄培坤;张仁寿;张尚瑶;;闽浙十一县市联手推动木拱廊桥申报世遗[N];福建日报;2009年

相关博士学位论文 前4条

1 褚兴彪;山东乡村聚落景观评价模型构建与优化应用研究[D];湖南农业大学;2013年

2 阙跃平;木拱廊桥与社区[D];中央民族大学;2012年

3 张艳玲;历史文化村镇评价体系研究[D];华南理工大学;2011年

4 蒋烨;中国廊桥建筑与文化研究[D];中南大学;2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 韦锦城;福建木拱廊桥的造型艺术研究[D];重庆大学;2015年

2 赵利敏;赣南客家廊桥艺术探析[D];赣南师范学院;2014年

3 何明春;闽东周宁县木拱廊桥研究[D];福建师范大学;2014年

4 欧加加;木拱廊桥受力机理的有限元分析[D];浙江大学;2014年

5 张亮;木拱廊桥受力机理的模型试验研究[D];浙江大学;2014年

6 梁水兰;传统村落评价认定指标体系研究[D];昆明理工大学;2013年

7 甘久航;试论屏南木拱廊桥的文化生态保护[D];中国艺术研究院;2013年

8 施彦帅;浙南廊桥地理信息系统的设计[D];华东师范大学;2011年

9 黄一滔;西南地区历史文化村镇保护评价研究[D];重庆大学;2011年

10 叶其炎;闽东木拱廊桥的民间信仰研究[D];福建师范大学;2009年



本文编号:2135714

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/daoluqiaoliang/2135714.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b414a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com