当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 路桥论文 >

交通工程中业主与承包商关系的动态治理研究

发布时间:2018-08-24 17:07
【摘要】:在工程供应链中,工程承包商为业主供应工程建设所需的技术、原材料、设备、人力等战略资源,即承包商为业主的工程建设能力供应商。在交通工程中,它们之间对立的关系是工程失败的主要原因。一直以来,正式合同是工程供应链成员之间关系治理的焦点,但实际上,由于合同具有敌对性和不完整性,所以关系治理机制越来越受到关注。本文首先基于社会资本理论和社会交换理论,将社会资本(例如,事前关系、共同准则和信任)定义为事前关系治理机制,将业主与承包商之间的协作(例如,信息交流、共同行为)定义为事后关系治理机制,从而考察它们在不同阶段对工程绩效的影响。其次,尽管治理机制的选择取决于业主和承包商测量项目团队行为和绩效的能力以及资源分配的能力,但是治理机制对工程控制能力的影响以及它们间的交互作用仍然未知。本文借鉴控制理论,将"工程控制能力"定义为一个新的结构,并推断"工程控制能力"不仅受到治理机制的运用的影响,而且它在治理机制与工程绩效的动态关系中充当着中介的角色。最后,本文通过交通工程过程的划分,重点研究在合同签署后的前期阶段和合同签署后的稳定阶段,治理机制、工程控制能力与工程绩效间的动态关系。本研究主要针对中国交通工程的业主和承包商设计和发放了问卷,最终回收了 288份有效问卷。然后运用最小偏二乘法结构方程建模处理和分析了数据,检测了研究假设、验证了研究模型。结果表明,在两个阶段,关系治理机制和正式合同相互促进;社会资本和正式合同都通过协作的中介作用对工程控制能力具有正面影响,在合同签署后的前期阶段,社会资本对工程绩效具有直接的正面促进作用,合同通过协作的中介作用对工程绩效具有间接的正面促进作用;在合同签署后的稳定阶段,协作通过工程控制能力的中介作用对工程绩效具有正面影响,正式合同对工程绩效无直接或间接的影响。
[Abstract]:In the engineering supply chain, the contractor supplies the technical, raw materials, equipment, manpower and other strategic resources needed for the construction of the project to the owner, that is, the contractor is the supplier of the engineering construction ability of the owner. In traffic engineering, the relationship between them is the main reason for the failure of the project. Formal contract has always been the focus of relationship governance among the members of engineering supply chain, but in fact, because of the hostility and incompleteness of contract, the mechanism of relationship governance has been paid more and more attention. Based on the theory of social capital and the theory of social exchange, this paper defines social capital (for example, prior relationship, common criterion and trust) as the governance mechanism of prior relationship, and defines the cooperation between owner and contractor (for example, information exchange). Common behavior) is defined as the ex post-relationship governance mechanism to examine their impact on engineering performance at different stages. Secondly, although the choice of governance mechanism depends on the ability of the employer and contractor to measure the behavior and performance of the project team and the ability to allocate resources, the impact of the governance mechanism on the engineering control ability and their interaction is still unknown. Based on the theory of control, this paper defines "engineering control ability" as a new structure, and concludes that "engineering control ability" is not only affected by the application of governance mechanism. Moreover, it acts as an intermediary in the dynamic relationship between governance mechanism and engineering performance. Finally, through the division of the traffic engineering process, this paper focuses on the dynamic relationship between the early stage after the contract signing and the stable stage after the contract signing, the governance mechanism, the engineering control ability and the engineering performance. In this study, a questionnaire was designed and distributed to the owners and contractors of Chinese traffic engineering, and 288 valid questionnaires were collected. Then the minimum partial multiplication structure equation is used to model and analyze the data, the research hypothesis is tested, and the research model is verified. The results show that, in the two stages, the relationship governance mechanism and the formal contract promote each other, the social capital and the formal contract have a positive impact on the engineering control ability through the intermediary function of collaboration, and in the early stage after the contract is signed, Social capital has a direct positive effect on project performance, while contract plays an indirect positive role in project performance through the intermediary role of cooperation; in the stable stage after the signing of the contract, the social capital plays an indirect and positive role in the project performance. Collaboration has a positive effect on engineering performance through the intermediary of engineering control ability, while formal contract has no direct or indirect effect on project performance.
【学位授予单位】:南京大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:U415.1

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前3条

1 云虹,胡明珠;供应链中的关系治理模式比较研究[J];物流技术;2004年11期

2 谢洪涛;陈帆;;契约治理与关系治理对建设项目绩效的影响研究[J];项目管理技术;2013年10期

3 ;[J];;年期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 江西财经大学 杨慧 蔡文著;创新龙头企业与农户关系治理机制[N];经济日报;2012年

2 朱沆 何轩;家族企业:关系治理or契约治理?[N];民营经济报;2007年

相关博士学位论文 前4条

1 陈旭;企业间合作关系治理的理论研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2010年

2 张群洪;组织际信息系统对关系治理及其绩效影响的实证研究[D];厦门大学;2009年

3 王颖;渠道关系治理研究[D];上海交通大学;2007年

4 李进中;基于控制权视角的家族大股东三重委托代理关系研究[D];山东大学;2015年

相关硕士学位论文 前9条

1 蒋坚;制度距离与国内跨区域联盟治理机制的关系研究[D];华南理工大学;2015年

2 伍紫莹;互动导向、关系学习与知识转移绩效的关联性研究[D];华南理工大学;2016年

3 沈宁远;家族超额控制与股价暴跌风险相关关系研究[D];浙江财经大学;2017年

4 田滨帆;关系治理对PPP项目管理绩效影响的研究[D];北京交通大学;2017年

5 白佳;交通工程中业主与承包商关系的动态治理研究[D];南京大学;2015年

6 赵超超;关系治理对建设项目管理绩效影响的实证分析[D];天津理工大学;2014年

7 刘丽;环境不确定性、关系治理与企业绩效关系的实证研究[D];新疆财经大学;2013年

8 姜翰;企业战略模式对企业关系实践影响的实证研究[D];清华大学;2009年

9 鄂莹晨;企业知识产权网络关系治理研究[D];黑龙江大学;2013年



本文编号:2201464

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/daoluqiaoliang/2201464.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b9ea2***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com